http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307
--- Comment #7 from David Ayers 2011-03-17 07:14:27 UTC
---
Thanks a lot for picking it up!
I'll keep an eye out for your version and will take it for a spin when it comes
available.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48154
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||hppa*-*-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48164
Summary: ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1443
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-17
10:36:01 UTC ---
I have reverted the patch from 4.6 for now because I have apparently committed
a bit too quickly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
Summary: gcc-4.6: internal compiler error: in build2_stat
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
--- Comment #16 from Ryan Hill 2011-03-17
11:36:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> GCC 4.4 and 4.5 reject the example too, so I don't know when the bug was
> fixed,
> it's apparently not a change in 4.6 (though there were some bugs in this a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
11:45:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > GCC 4.4 and 4.5 reject the example too, so I don't know when the bug was
> > fixed,
> > it's apparently not a change in 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
12:02:02 UTC ---
Testresults for gcc-4_6-branch built under Xcode 4.0 using
lto-bootstrap/profiledbootstrap with Iain's first attempt at containerization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
12:07:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23690
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23690
gcc47-pr48163-2.patch
Patch to fix the wrap_constant ICE. In the (rare) case where a constant is
ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
12:35:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 12:35:04 2011
New Revision: 171089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171089
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48141
* dse.c (record_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
12:36:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 12:36:04 2011
New Revision: 171090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171090
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48141
* params.def (PAR
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: martin.kronbich...@it.uu.se
Using gcc version 4.6.0 20110317 (svn revision 171087) on x86-64 Linux with the
code
struct foo {
static void func ();
};
void foo::func () const {};
and compile line "g++ -c test_static.cc&q
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44606
--- Comment #17 from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-03-17 13:02:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Does the testcase still test for the problem if you replace the declarations
> of
> stderr etc. with "#include "? This fails with link errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
13:19:05 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:19:01 2011
New Revision: 171092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171092
Log:
2011-03-17 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
13:22:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:22:26 2011
New Revision: 171093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171093
Log:
2011-03-17 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48165
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
13:25:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:25:23 2011
New Revision: 171094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171094
Log:
2011-03-17 Richard Guenther
PR bootst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #43 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-17 13:29:04
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Mar 17 13:29:01 2011
New Revision: 171095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171095
Log:
PR fortran/47571
* intrinsics/system_clock.c [_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48096
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-17
13:32:14 UTC ---
Opened radar Problem ID: 9148312 , "Assertion failed: (cfiStartsArray[i] !=
cfiStartsArray[i-1]), function parse" and provided Apple with stand alone test
case demonstrating the linkage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
13:34:17 UTC ---
Sure, but was it the same problem? Are you sure it wasn't PR48158 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-17 13:35:30 UTC ---
Conclusion for the build under Solaris2.8, from my point of view, and
compared to the build of gcc-4.5.2 (languages C and C++):
- as perl 5.6.1 (or higher) is not directly available
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-17 13:51:03 UTC ---
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you please attach preprocessed source and gcc options used to compile it?
> I'd look with a cross compiler..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
13:58:19 UTC ---
actually I see you're right, libgomp/configure doesn't allow symvers to be
disabled for Solaris. Shouldn't there be a test like this before setting it?
if test x$enable_symvers = xye
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43872
--- Comment #4 from Chung-Lin Tang 2011-03-17
14:02:15 UTC ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Mar 17 14:02:12 2011
New Revision: 171096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171096
Log:
2011-03-17 Chung-Lin Tang
PR target/43872
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 14:04:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
> 13:58:19 UTC ---
> actually I see you're right, libgomp/configure doesn't allow symvers to be
> disabled for S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
14:10:39 UTC ---
The issue is that in one of the chains passed to
convert_control_dep_chain_into_preds contains just one edge, one where a
GIMPLE_CALL has more than one edge and so we skip it. This me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 14:17:37 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
> 13:55:16 UTC ---
> what about --enable-symvers=no ?
> you shouldn't need to edit configure
Of course not, tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-17 14:25:36 UTC ---
/home2/dave/gcc-4.6/objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home2/dave/gcc-4.6/objdir/./prev-g
cc/ -B/home2/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/hppa-linux/bin/
-B/home2/dave/opt/gnu/gc
c/gcc-4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
14:33:19 UTC ---
I can reproduce it, but even with --enable-checking=yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171075 fails
on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34758
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-17 14:43:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I don't really understand Denis' reluctance to build a newer perl as a
> prerequisite
No problem with perl itself, i've a working perl-5.13.10 compiled o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
Summary: [4.7 regression] Solaris 2/SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE
in sparc_function_arg_1, at config/sparc/sparc.c:5721
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
14:59:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 17 14:59:00 2011
New Revision: 171098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171098
Log:
2011-03-17 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:00:56 UTC ---
Reduced testcase for -O2:
typedef struct T *R;
typedef union P { int i; } S;
struct T { union { S f[1]; } u; };
struct G { int l; int t; int r; };
typedef struct G H;
typedef struct {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:12:19 UTC ---
Ah, it isn't any difference between --enable-checking=release and
--enable-checking=yes behavior of cc1, but instead just that haifa-sched.i is
different.
We are expanding
D.2070_29 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 15:12:12 UTC ---
> --- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier
> 2011-03-17 14:43:35 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #11)
>> I don't really understand Denis' reluctance to build a newer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-03-17
15:21:03 UTC ---
Duplicate of PR middle-end/48152?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:21:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 15:21:39 2011
New Revision: 171101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171101
Log:
PR middle-end/48152
* var-tracking.c (prepa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-17
15:22:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 15:22:20 2011
New Revision: 171102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171102
Log:
PR bootstrap/48153
* dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-17 15:35:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 23693
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23693
Minor improvement to register allocation
Was showing good results for x86; however, was regressing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-17
15:37:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Ah, it isn't any difference between --enable-checking=release and
> --enable-checking=yes behavior of cc1, but instead just that haifa-sched.i is
> diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||46542
--- Comment #9 from Manuel Ló
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-17 15:41:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 23694
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23694
Andy's frame-pointerless mcount patch
This is Andy's frame-pointerless mcount patch. There was a t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
Summary: compiler is confused about scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #1 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:45:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23696
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23696
command to call the compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #2 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:46:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 23697
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23697
gzipped compiler log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #3 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
15:47:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23698
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23698
output of "uname -a"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #14 from Denis Excoffier
2011-03-17 15:48:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I see, but on the other hand this will be a fairly uncommon undertaking.
You must know that the process is highly automatized, and, most importantly,
tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48168
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 15:57:55 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-03-17
> 15:21:03 UTC ---
> Duplicate of PR middle-end/48152?
Might be, but the testcase from Comment #5 doesn't fail for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41998
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Depends on|17843, 20070
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-17 16:01:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 23700
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23700
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-18 delta]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/usr/bin/gcc -O2 -ffast-math
-S testcase-min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17
16:02:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 17 16:02:08 2011
New Revision: 171103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171103
Log:
PR c++/48166
* decl.c (revert_static_member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
16:08:32 UTC ---
http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#base-lookup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #6 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
16:14:27 UTC ---
> In a template unqualified names are not looked up in dependent base classes
Aegypt?!
Then explain to me, why it works for all the other classes and including other
methods inside
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126
Marcus Shawcroft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus.shawcroft at arm dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
Jeffrey Yasskin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 16:17:47 UTC ---
>> Btw., what's your reason to still be running Solaris 8? I'm the Solaris
>> GCC maintainer and seriously consider to deprecate it for GCC 4.7.
> Here we still h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #7 from Peter Foelsche 2011-03-17
16:18:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > In a template unqualified names are not looked up in dependent base classes
>
> Aegypt?!
>
> Then explain to me, why it works for all the other classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-17
16:19:07 UTC ---
See the link in comment 5, or this one:
http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#dep_lookup_bases
or this one:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq/templates.html#faq-35.19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
--- Comment #11 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-17
16:41:24 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Mar 17 16:41:05 2011
New Revision: 171105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171105
Log:
PR debug/47510
gcc/
PR debug/47510
* dw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|Denis.Excoffier at airbus |
|dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-17 16:56:13 UTC
---
Richard, this patch of yours fails on IRIX 5 and 6. I suppose this is a target
bug, since it does pass on other platforms (Tru64 UNIX, Solaris 2/SPARC and
x86) that don't have mempcpy i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-17 16:58:31 UTC ---
>> That's part your fault and part ours: while install.texi states `MPC
>> Library version 0.8.1 (or later)', later versions are rarely tested and
>> often break,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-17 16:59:13 UTC ---
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47405
>
> --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-17 16:56:13
> UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48170
Summary: ICE: in hoist_code, at gcse.c:4524 with -fgcse --param
max-hoist-depth={0,1}
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
