[Bug debug/47510] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Summary|DW_TAG_typedef

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-16 20:19:20 UTC --- Author: pthaugen Date: Wed Mar 16 20:19:14 2011 New Revision: 171072 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171072 Log: PR target/47862 * caller-save.c (in

[Bug c++/48132] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/48115] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in type_has_nontrivial_copy_init, at cp/tree.c:2482

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48115 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48113] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] bind with tuple argument fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48113 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/28767] GCC should output DW_TAG_ptr_to_member for member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28767 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-16 20:24:29 UTC --- Patch posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00949.html

[Bug go/48019] Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-16 20:32:38 UTC --- I don't have access to a Solaris system. I would be very interested in hearing whether connect and accept calls are restarted after a signal handler installed with SA_RESTART, or w

[Bug go/48019] Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019 --- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-16 20:33:31 UTC --- Created attachment 23683 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23683 test On GNU/Linux this program prints connect: Connection timed out

[Bug rtl-optimization/48156] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug bootstrap/48153] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171033 fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milesto

[Bug bootstrap/48153] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171033 fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-16 20:37:17 UTC --- Created attachment 23685 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23685 gcc47-pr48153.patch Please try this patch.

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48157] New: Unable to match function call to member function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157 Summary: Unable to match function call to member function template Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/47959] [C++0x] brace-or-equal-initializer not allowed for static data member of const literal type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47959 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/48158] New: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158 Summary: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/48158] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/46336] [C++0X] ICE on invalid: in register_constexpr_fundef, at cp/semantics.c:5571

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug debug/47510] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-16 21:05:03 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Wed Mar 16 21:04:58 2011 New Revision: 171073 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171073 Log: PR debug/47510 gcc/ PR debug/47510 * dwa

[Bug debug/47510] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 --- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-16 21:11:19 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Wed Mar 16 21:11:17 2011 New Revision: 171074 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171074 Log: PR debug/47510 gcc/ PR debug/47510 * dwa

[Bug fortran/47976] [4.5 Regression] Recent gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_3.f90 regression on arm-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976 --- Comment #4 from Michael Hope 2011-03-16 21:18:59 UTC --- Not present in svn168270, svn169407, svn169832 Present in svn170086. This leaves the following commits: r170086 | gerald | 2011-02-13 08:22:17 +1300 (Sun, 13 Feb 2011) r170053 | bern

[Bug debug/48159] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in build2_stat (tree.c:3802) with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-ch -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48159 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in build2_stat (tree.c:3802) with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-ch -g Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug debug/47510] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48157] Unable to match function call to member function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code S

[Bug middle-end/42371] dead code not eliminated during folding with whole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371 --- Comment #9 from Matt Hargett 2011-03-16 21:43:56 UTC --- Now that 4.7 stage 1 is open, let me know if there's anything else I can reasonably provide to provide examples, testing, etc. Thanks!

[Bug debug/48160] New: prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160 Summary: prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: una

[Bug c++/48010] typedef redefinitions are allowed if the redefined type is a nested class type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48010 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fabien at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/48114] [C++0x] binomial_distribution incorrect for p > .5 and geometric_distribution wrongly implements the TR1 definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114 --- Comment #20 from Andrey Zholos 2011-03-16 22:43:45 UTC --- Good idea. The testcases should be adapted to the code paths in the GCC generators though: for instance, binomial with p > .5 isn't covered there. And BINS should be increased: for in

[Bug target/44606] Wrong SPE floating point during computation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44606 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug debug/48160] prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug target/48139] __builtin_lrintf() becomes a library call, not an cvtss2si instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139 --- Comment #6 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2011-03-16 22:59:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > So, there's no glibc bug, but I don't think this makes a compelling case for > any particular gcc behavior. The "implementation" is gcc+glibc,

[Bug go/48019] Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019 Sean McGovern changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug bootstrap/48153] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171033 fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-16 23:07:58 UTC --- > Created attachment 23685 [details] > gcc47-pr48153.patch > > Please try this patch. This fix the bootstrap at revision 171072. Thanks.

[Bug c++/47504] some constexpr calculations erroneously overflow when using negative numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/48139] __builtin_lrintf() becomes a library call, not an cvtss2si instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug bootstrap/48161] New: [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6 branch with release checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161 Summary: [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6 branch with release checking Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/47504] some constexpr calculations erroneously overflow when using negative numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-16 23:43:38 UTC --- >which has implementation-defined behavior according to the C and C++ standards. But that does not mean it has an overflow though, right?

[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48156] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48118] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] g++ sometimes allows copying a volatile class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48118 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/48046] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Expected diagnostic "reference to 'type' is ambiguous" not given for function-local static declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48141] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE compile time hog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/48156] [4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fcrossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48156 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-17 00:24:52 UTC --- Cross-jumping changes this: 24 NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 25 si:SI=bx:SI REG_DEAD: bx:SI 26 di:SI=0x8 27 call <...> REG_DEAD: di:SI REG_DEAD: si:SI RE

[Bug c++/43947] [C++0x] constexpr should allow declaration without a definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43947 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/48139] __builtin_lrintf() becomes a library call, not an cvtss2si instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2011-03-17 01:09:38 UTC --- Ah, I didn't check Posix, specifically http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/lrint.html. I now agree that gcc can't optimize this without -fno-math-errno.

[Bug c++/47301] [C++0x] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1906 with -fabi-version=1 and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47301 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48161] [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6 branch with release checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48161] [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6 branch with release checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-03-17 02:34:28 UTC --- On linux, this is caused by this insn: (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn) (insn:TI 548 1143 1305 (set (reg:SI 31 %r31 [orig:147 D.35803 ] [147]) (mem/s:SI (plus:SI (const_int 60 [0x

[Bug c++/46336] [C++0X] ICE on invalid: in register_constexpr_fundef, at cp/semantics.c:5571

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46336 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 02:36:15 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 17 02:36:12 2011 New Revision: 171084 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171084 Log: PR c++/46336 * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Re

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 02:36:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 17 02:36:04 2011 New Revision: 171083 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171083 Log: PR c++/47570 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta

[Bug c++/47301] [C++0x] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1906 with -fabi-version=1 and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47301 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 02:36:23 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 17 02:36:20 2011 New Revision: 171085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171085 Log: PR c++/47301 * decl.c (compute_array_index_

[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 02:36:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 17 02:36:29 2011 New Revision: 171086 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171086 Log: PR c++/48089 * semantics.c (potential_const

[Bug c++/46336] [C++0X] ICE on invalid: in register_constexpr_fundef, at cp/semantics.c:5571

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|4.6.0

[Bug c++/47301] [C++0x] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1906 with -fabi-version=1 and constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47301 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug c++/48089] [C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48089 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/48161] [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6 branch with release checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-03-17 02:48:27 UTC --- (insn 548 547 0 (set (reg:SI 147 [ D.35803 ]) (mem/s:SI (plus:SI (const_int 60 [0x3c]) (reg:SI 411)) [2 D.37625_60->reg_pressure_excess_cost_change+0 S 4 A3

[Bug go/48019] Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47504] some constexpr calculations erroneously overflow when using negative numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 03:14:22 UTC --- True, the language standards seem to distinguish between this and the overflow you get from saying INT_MAX+1. But GCC internals do not make this distinction; in either case, we end up

[Bug c++/48162] New: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/48162] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com Target Milestone|---

[Bug regression/48163] New: [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48163 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: ICEs for cris-elf, like gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libobjc/38307] Calling of the +initialize method is not completely thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307 --- Comment #6 from rfm at gnu dot org 2011-03-17 06:20:42 UTC --- I spent some hours looking at your code and I like it ... it's certainly clearer than mine. I found three problems which i've fixed on my system: 1. failure to check CLS_ISRESOLV e

<    1   2