[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 --- Comment #7 from Dongsheng Song 2011-03-15 08:01:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Since gcc 4.6 branched, gcc trunk and 4.6 branch both have this issue now. > > It is not a GCC bug, it's a Binutils bug. The patch >

[Bug c++/48132] New: Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=cxx0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 Summary: Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=cxx0x Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/48031] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42956.c ICEs gcc on m68k-linux, ivopts related?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-15 08:44:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Created attachment 23614 [details] > patch > > testing appreciated Applied to gcc 4.6/4.5/4.4 then bootstrapped and regression tested on m68k-linux w

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|fxcouder

[Bug c++/48132] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug tree-optimization/48129] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-apple-darwin9, |

[Bug other/48111] libquadmath: strtoflt128 bug on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48111 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c/48088] -Werror=frame-larger-than=100 does not work as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-03-15 09:20:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Yeah. Confirmed. > > > > You need -Wframe-larger-than=500 -Werror=frame-larger-than which hopefully > > doesn't reset th

[Bug libfortran/47883] libgfortran configuration should use AC_LINK_IFELSE instead of AC_TRY_LINK

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47166] [4.5 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for ARM with -O3 -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166 --- Comment #33 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-15 09:38:10 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Mar 15 09:38:07 2011 New Revision: 170982 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170982 Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR rtl-optimiz

[Bug target/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |amodra at gmail dot com |g

[Bug tree-optimization/48031] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42956.c ICEs gcc on m68k-linux, ivopts related?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031 --- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 09:49:39 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 15 09:49:33 2011 New Revision: 170983 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170983 Log: 2011-03-15 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug c++/48118] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] g++ sometimes allows copying a volatile class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48118 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6

[Bug fortran/48117] [4.5 Regression] ICE: OpenMP; in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1178

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48117 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 10:06:28 UTC --- Oops - my bad ;)

[Bug rtl-optimization/47899] [4.5 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 10:09:25 UTC --- Confirmed, but can you track this in a new bug?

[Bug debug/45088] pointer type information lost in debuginfo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 10:21:04 UTC --- Hm, e has alignment of 8 bytes and f of 4 but the assembler doesn't pad e's size to 8 byte multiples appearantly .data .align 8 .type e, @object .

[Bug target/48127] Program crashes reading a non-aligned variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48127 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/48128] Excessive code generated for vectorized loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48128 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-*-*|i686-*-*, x86_64-*-* Statu

[Bug libstdc++/48130] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on libsupc++/nested_exception.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/48132] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UN

[Bug rtl-optimization/47899] [4.5 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899 --- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-15 10:50:35 UTC --- Thank you for reply. I opened PR48133 for the testcase from comment #10.

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 10:52:44 UTC --- I think that is not the problem, it is fine if some variables are aligned more than they need to be for performance reasons. TYPE_ALIGN is still 32 bits, while just DECL_ALIGN is 64 b

[Bug tree-optimization/41490] tree-ssa-sink does not really work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41490 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 11:09:14 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 15 11:09:09 2011 New Revision: 170984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170984 Log: 2011-03-15 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/41490] tree-ssa-sink does not really work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41490 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/12395] Suboptimal code with global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12395 --- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 11:24:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > To optimize > > void foo() { > extern int a; > if(++a) ++a; > } > > we need to have partial dead store elimination, basically sink the

[Bug tree-optimization/48129] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48129 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 11:28:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 15 11:28:35 2011 New Revision: 170985 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170985 Log: PR tree-optimization/48129 * builtins.c (fo

[Bug objc/39753] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Objective-C(++) and C90 strict-aliasing interaction bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/46763] gcc 4.5: missed optimization: copy global to local, prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46763 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug objc/39753] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Objective-C(++) and C90 strict-aliasing interaction bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 11:49:12 UTC --- The easiest way is to attach the may_alias attribute to all object types that should not be subject to TBAA. Bonus point if you transition that attribute to use a flag instead.

[Bug c++/48132] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/48037] Missed optimization: unnecessary register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 12:22:18 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 15 12:22:12 2011 New Revision: 170986 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170986 Log: 2011-03-15 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug rtl-optimization/48037] Missed optimization: unnecessary register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48037 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 12:41:57 UTC --- The patch fixed the pass-by-value cases to no longer go through stack memory. The useless reg-reg moves prevail: _Z6vsqrt2U8__vectord: .LFB520: .cfi_startproc sqrts

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-03-15 12:42:36 UTC --- > struct S > { >signed a : 26; >signed b : 16; >signed c : 10; >volatile signed d : 14; >int e; > } s; > I think you can't just modify s.e when writing s.d (I thin

[Bug target/48032] PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48032 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2011-03-15 12:57:42 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Mar 15 12:57:37 2011 New Revision: 170990 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170990 Log: PR target/48032 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (off

[Bug target/48032] PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48032 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch Status|

[Bug c++/48132] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error on array of std::complex with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 13:19:09 UTC --- Regressed (expectedly) with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166167 The problem seems to be that the middle-end relies on indexes being filled in in ctors for arrays, b

[Bug c++/13954] [tree-ssa] SRA does not work for classes that use inheritance with an empty base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13954 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 13:37:42 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 15 13:37:23 2011 New Revision: 170994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170994 Log: 2011-03-15 Richard Guenther PR tree-o

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 13:39:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 15 13:39:28 2011 New Revision: 170995 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170995 Log: 2011-03-15 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/13954] [tree-ssa] SRA does not work for classes that use inheritance with an empty base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13954 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 13:59:05 UTC --- That's the COMPONENT_REF case which runs into get_inner_reference which doesn't deal with invalid MEM_REFs either. It returns t.s as base.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 14:36:39 UTC --- Created attachment 23664 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23664 gcc46-pr48134.patch This fixes it, though perhaps as discussed earlier we want to fold everything in

[Bug bootstrap/48135] New: build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 Summary: build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48136] New: verify_gimple failed at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136 Summary: verify_gimple failed at -O0 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 --- Comment #2 from Denis Excoffier 2011-03-15 15:09:37 UTC --- Oh, thank you for pointing, but i should not be concerned since i didn't modify the sources (i simply include gmp/mpfr/mpc within the source directory tree). Perhaps this is a side-

[Bug fortran/48112] [4.6/4.7 Regression] generic interface to external function in module

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48136] verify_gimple failed at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-15 15:19:34 UTC --- But are you using Sun ld, building libstdc++, and not using --disable-symvers?

[Bug fortran/47552] CTIME: Valgrind warning "depends on uninitialised value"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-15 15:26:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > If not before, perhaps something to fix when/if we change to use size_t for > > string lengths, see http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Li

[Bug c/48136] verify_gimple failed at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/47552] CTIME: Valgrind warning "depends on uninitialised value"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552 --- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert 2011-03-15 15:36:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > - Yes, Fortran itself does not have unsigned integers, but the string length > type is invisible to Fortran programs. The LEN intrinsic does return

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #16 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 15:52:01 UTC --- Created attachment 23665 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23665 dump_function_declaration with debug

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #17 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 15:53:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23666 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23666 debug output from a run of the modified function

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 15:56:04 UTC --- comment #13 would happen if the list of argument types is not terminated by the shared tree node void_list_node but by a clone. We expect the shared void_list_node to be used else

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 15:59:44 UTC --- All looks good to me with your C testcase: gcc> gdb --args ./cc1 -quiet t.i (gdb) b gimplify_function_tree Breakpoint 5 at 0x855ac4: file /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gimpli

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #20 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 16:03:23 UTC --- Unfortunately I cannot confirm that this bug is fixed, so I need to reopen it. For one thing this bug is not only about variadic functions, but dump_function_declaration() ret

[Bug c++/47688] [C++0x] Segfault when assigning lambda to std::function variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47688 --- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 16:14:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 16:14:21 2011 New Revision: 171000 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171000 Log: Fix PR 47688 2011-03-18 Ramana Radhakrish

[Bug libstdc++/47668] missing 'typename' in debug-mode map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47668 --- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 16:14:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 16:14:21 2011 New Revision: 171000 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171000 Log: Fix PR 47688 2011-03-18 Ramana Radhakrish

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #21 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 16:18:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > All looks good to me with your C testcase: > > (gdb) call debug_generic_expr (fndecl->common.type) > int (struct > { > double dvar; > int iva

[Bug tree-optimization/48137] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48137 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-15 16:24:01 UTC --- >> I'd really like to see this fixed before 4.6.0: it is a regression from >> 4.5 and makes fortran completely unusable on Tru64 UNIX for a relatively >> minor gai

[Bug debug/47510] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 16:24:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > This is because G++ generates struct F::C. The instantiated > F::C a typedef. No anonymous struct is generated inside F. > What is generated is really t

[Bug tree-optimization/48137] [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48137 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 16:29:33 UTC --- indirect calls can't be always-inline, the testcase is invalid.

[Bug tree-optimization/48137] [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48137 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-15 16:32:37 UTC --- Oh, sorry. It was reduced from gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44043.c: ... static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int dst_output(struct sk_buff *skb) { return skb_dst(skb)->output(s

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-03-15 16:33:09 UTC --- On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, joe at mcknight dot de wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 > > --- Comment #21 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 16:18:37

[Bug tree-optimization/48137] [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48137 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-15 16:36:34 UTC --- Yes, well ... if it "works" you are lucky. "Works" in this case can even mean we simply don't turn the indirect call into a direct one (in which case we'll not notice the fn is alw

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 Denis Excoffier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Denis.Excoffier at airbus

[Bug middle-end/48136] verify_gimple failed at -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 16:46:02 UTC --- Created attachment 23668 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23668 gcc47-pr48136.patch Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.

[Bug tree-optimization/48137] [4.6/4.7 Regression] "sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'cb'" with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48137 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23648|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/47650] wrong output of print_generic_decl() called from a plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650 --- Comment #23 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-15 17:05:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > > Compare it to: > > > > typedef int mytype; > > int myfunc2(mytype var) { > > return 1; > > }; > > > > which outputs > > > > static int my

[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 17:05:56 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 17:05:51 2011 New Revision: 171002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171002 Log: Fixup last commit. Fixed PR target/46788

[Bug c++/47688] [C++0x] Segfault when assigning lambda to std::function variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47688 --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 17:05:56 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 17:05:51 2011 New Revision: 171002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171002 Log: Fixup last commit. Fixed PR target/46788

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-15 17:07:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sun ld yes, libstdc++ i suppose (although i was caught in libgomp) and > --disable-symvers is the next thing i'm going to try. > > Still not convinced tha

[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 17:07:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Author: ramana > Date: Tue Mar 15 17:05:51 2011 > New Revision: 171002 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171002 > Log: > >

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-15 17:08:03 UTC --- Looks fine to me.

[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-15 17:16:11 UTC --- AFAICS, however, pr47688.c is still there.

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #40 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-15 17:19:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) > >> I'd really like to see this fixed before 4.6.0: it is a regression from > >> 4.5 and makes fortran completely unusable on Tru64 UNIX for a relatively

MIPS: va_arg is unable to correct extract an empty zero-length array

Hi Eric, Hi Richard, A customer has reported the following bug with the MIPS target. Since it is for a GNU extension to the C language (zero-length arrays) that is being used in a non-intended fashion (the zero-length array is in a structure with no other fields) I doubt if you will want

[Bug target/48127] Program crashes reading a non-aligned variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48127 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-15 18:00:23 UTC --- I do not agree that the testcase is invalid. As the standart says: Common extensions Multiple external definitions There may be more than one external definition for the

[Bug c++/48138] New: __attribute__((aligned)) should give an error when applied to a typedef or template parameter, at least in C++0x mode.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48138 Summary: __attribute__((aligned)) should give an error when applied to a typedef or template parameter, at least in C++0x mode. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug c/47557] Effect of aligned attribute on arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47557 Jeffrey Yasskin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/34758] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bad diagnostic for circular dependency in constructor default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34758 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-15 18:27:15 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 15 18:27:09 2011 New Revision: 171009 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171009 Log: PR c++/34758 * call.c (convert_default_arg

[Bug objc/39753] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Objective-C(++) and C90 strict-aliasing interaction bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|alias, wrong-code | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/46922] Missing exported symbols from libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15 18:43:21 UTC --- Hey P, why was bad_function_call added in CXXABI instead of GLIBCXX? That doesn't make sense to me. -benjamin

[Bug boehm-gc/47309] gcc-4.4.5 fails to build on darwin/ppc due to issues in boehm-gc GC_test_and_set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47309 Eric Le Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elelay at macports dot org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libstdc++/48130] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on libsupc++/nested_exception.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48130 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-15 19:01:57 UTC --- HP if you can confirm this is now working, can you close this? thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/46922] Missing exported symbols from libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-15 19:03:01 UTC --- Uhhhm, you are right, doesn't make much sense, I don't know what i was thinking. Luckily we are still in time to move those lines in gnu.ver. Let me know if you want me to do it or you

[Bug libstdc++/46922] Missing exported symbols from libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 --- Comment #8 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-15 19:43:44 UTC --- Author: pthaugen Date: Tue Mar 15 19:43:38 2011 New Revision: 171016 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171016 Log: PR target/47862 * caller-save.c (in

[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 19:59:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 19:59:25 2011 New Revision: 171017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171017 Log: Fix PR target/46788 Added: branches/

  1   2   >