[Bug c++/46565] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in pop_tinst_level (pt.c:7513) with -gstabs -g on invalid code

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46565 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/33763] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Bogus inlining failed in call to `xxx': redefined extern inline functions are not considered for inlining

2011-03-11 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21

[Bug c++/47144] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Doesn't reject attempt to define type in template argument; results in weird parse

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/47144] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Doesn't reject attempt to define type in template argument; results in weird parse

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-11 22:48:02 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 11 22:47:59 2011 New Revision: 170888 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170888 Log: PR c++/47144 * parser.c (cp_parser_template

[Bug c++/47144] [4.5 Regression] Doesn't reject attempt to define type in template argument; results in weird parse

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.6.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress

[Bug c++/47144] [4.5 Regression] Doesn't reject attempt to define type in template argument; results in weird parse

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47144 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47446] [x32] .quad instead of .long is used for address

2011-03-11 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47446 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-11 23:13:38 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Mar 11 23:13:35 2011 New Revision: 170889 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170889 Log: Always allow the offsetted memory references

[Bug middle-end/47128] gcc.dg/graphite/pr43012.c ICEs with cloog-parma

2011-03-11 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47128 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48082] New: Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system.

2011-03-11 Thread x.user1372 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48082 Summary: Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/48082] Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system.

2011-03-11 Thread x.user1372 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48082 --- Comment #1 from VA 2011-03-12 00:33:10 UTC --- Created attachment 23634 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23634 preprocessor file

[Bug libfortran/48047] Incorrect output rounding of double precision numbers

2011-03-11 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-12 00:49:55 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Mar 12 00:49:51 2011 New Revision: 170895 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170895 Log: 2011-03-11 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug target/48082] Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system.

2011-03-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48082 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Component|c

[Bug c/48083] New: DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT + -no-integrated-cpp produces bad dependencies

2011-03-11 Thread cgd at google dot com
Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: c...@google.com gcc version 4.6.0 20110311 (experimental) (GCC), but I reproduced this all the way back to 4.2.x. $ : > null.c # Hey, we have an empty file! $ DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT=/dev/stdout ./gcc -c null.c nul

[Bug target/48082] Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system.

2011-03-11 Thread x.user1372 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48082 --- Comment #3 from VA 2011-03-12 01:35:36 UTC --- Ok, for the sake of my curiosity, could you explain why it is only an "issue" when compiling with the 64 bit libraries?

[Bug target/48084] New: [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

2011-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48085] New: [x32] Unnecessary zero-extension

2011-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
length = 2] ret# 20return_internal[length = 1] .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .sizefoo, .-foo .ident"GCC: (GNU) 4.6.0 20110311 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ We don't need to zero-extend 32bit pointer in EDI to RDI.

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

2011-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 02:11:23 UTC --- Another similar one: [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat z.i typedef int __m64 __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8), __may_alias__)); typedef char __v8qi __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))); void _m

[Bug lto/48086] New: bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
-DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -flto=jobserver -frandom-seed=1 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Ic-family -I../../gcc-4.6-20110311/gcc -I../../gcc-4.6

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-12 02:16:22 UTC --- $ ../gcc-4.6-20110311/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages

[Bug c++/47874] Multiple Inheritance - Virtual Function - Segfault

2011-03-11 Thread isahib at xtra dot co.nz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47874 Ibaidul Sahib changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Ibaidul Sahib

[Bug target/48082] Problem compiling function that returns va_list on 64 bit system.

2011-03-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48082 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-12 02:20:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, for the sake of my curiosity, could you explain why it is only an "issue" > when compiling with the 64 bit libraries? Because va_list is target specific

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

2011-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 02:23:35 UTC --- Another one: [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat m.i void _mm_monitor (void const * __P, unsigned int __E, unsigned int __H) { __builtin_ia32_monitor (__P, __E, __H); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ /expo

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-03-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
/gcc4.6/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20110311/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

2011-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 04:04:49 UTC --- Another one: [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat f.i void _mm_clflush (void const *__A) { __builtin_ia32_clflush (__A); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

2011-03-11 Thread anatol.pomozov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #8 from Anatol 2011-03-12 04:50:22 UTC --- What are the plans? Are you going to submit the fix to 4.6? How can I help you with testing?

[Bug c++/48087] New: -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

2011-03-11 Thread cgd at google dot com
: /tmp/x.cc:22:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function $ -> 4 errors. Huh? GCC pre-4.6 (svn trunk as of yesterday): $ inst/bin/gcc --version | head -1 gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110311 (experimental) $ $ inst/bin/gcc -c /tmp/x.cc -Wall /tmp/x.cc: In function 'bool DeltaTwo(bool)&#

[Bug c++/47125] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE occurs in combination with partial specialization and invalid template function.

2011-03-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47125 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-12 06:49:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Mar 12 06:48:57 2011 New Revision: 170896 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170896 Log: PR c++/47125 * pt.c (tsubst) [TYPENAME_TYPE

[Bug c/48088] New: -Werror=frame-larger-than=100 does not work as expected

2011-03-11 Thread cgd at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088 Summary: -Werror=frame-larger-than=100 does not work as expected Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in

2011-03-11 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824 --- Comment #13 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-12 07:28:26 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Sat Mar 12 07:28:20 2011 New Revision: 170897 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170897 Log: PR c++/46824 gcc/cp/ * call.c (add_builtin_

[Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in

2011-03-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2