[Bug fortran/47984] New: Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 Summary: Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug c++/47985] New: suppose pure abstract function resolve error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47985 Summary: suppose pure abstract function resolve error Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug rtl-optimization/47925] delete_trivially_dead_insns mishandles volatile mems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47925 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47985] suppose pure abstract function resolve error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47985 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-03-04 10:02:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Manu, can we close this? @Jonathan I still think that the messages of Comeau and Clang are better than GCC's. I will try for 4.7 to produce a patch

[Bug c++/47985] suppose pure abstract function resolve error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47985 --- Comment #2 from Gennady 2011-03-04 10:05:39 UTC --- everybody, sorry for disturbance A got entry for "virtual void foo()=0;" even for "=0" so ‘foo’ is ambiguous for C

[Bug target/47975] ICE: in expand_shift, at expmed.c:2299 when using 256b vectors without -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-04 10:27:17 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 4 10:27:10 2011 New Revision: 170672 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170672 Log: 2011-03-04 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug target/47975] ICE: in expand_shift, at expmed.c:2299 when using 256b vectors without -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47975 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47968] ICE: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:51 when converting vector of double to vector of float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-04 10:31:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 4 10:31:33 2011 New Revision: 170673 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170673 Log: 2011-03-04 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/47968] ICE: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:51 when converting vector of double to vector of float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47968 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47981] gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 FAILs on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/44281] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Global Register variable pessimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281 --- Comment #8 from Adam Warner 2011-03-04 10:51:01 UTC --- Jakub, I fail to see how your conclusion not to do this is supported by the facts. There are: (a) six global register variables (though the same effect can be observed with one global r

[Bug fortran/47976] Recent fortran testsuite regressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/47986] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/44281] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Global Register variable pessimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 11:22:51 UTC --- You are talking about this single testcase, I'm talking in general that if gcc is on x86_64 tuned for a medium sized general purpose register file and you suddenly turn it into a very

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-04 11:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Manu, can we close this? > > @Jonathan > > I still think that the messages of Comeau and Clang are better than GCC's. I >

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra 2011-03-04 11:24:02 UTC --- I can easily fix rs6000_delegitimize_address to handle this debug expression, but I suspect that would be papering over the real problem, the duplicate debug_insns.

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug c++/47987] New: ICE on legal code (when attempting to inline non-implicitly instantiated template member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47987 Summary: ICE on legal code (when attempting to inline non-implicitly instantiated template member function) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critica

[Bug c++/47987] ICE on legal code (when attempting to inline non-implicitly instantiated template member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47987 --- Comment #1 from niemayer at isg dot de 2011-03-04 11:43:25 UTC --- The line that gcc reports to cause the ICE contains: if (offset_a2->preallocate(text_1.length())) { "offset_a2" is an instance of class Array, unsigned long> - if that class

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/33928] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] 30% performance slowdown in floating-point code caused by r118475

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928 --- Comment #115 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-04 11:58:13 UTC --- Hm, there doesn't seem to be a runtime testcase attached to this bug, so I can't produce numbers for the upcoming 4.6 release. Brad, can you do so if you have time? Thanks. Btw

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] missing optimization on const addr area store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips*-* powerpc*-*-*|mips*-* powerpc*-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/47967] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: conversion of register to a different size with -fipa-cp on undefined code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/33763] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Bogus inlining failed in call to `xxx': redefined extern inline functions are not considered for inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33763 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-10-14 10:26:41 |2011-03-04 10:26:41 Known to fail

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-12-07 20:19:26 |2011-03-04 20:19:26 Known to work

[Bug c/47977] powerpc (-mcpu=8548) Wrong code for double operations in little endian mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47977 Marco Lazzarotto changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c --- Comment #3 from Marco Lazzarotto

[Bug target/47988] New: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403: insn does not satisfy its constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47988 Summary: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403: insn does not satisfy its constraints Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/47987] ICE on legal code (when attempting to inline non-implicitly instantiated template member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47987 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/47967] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: conversion of register to a different size with -fipa-cp on undefined code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 13:36:50 UTC --- Created attachment 23543 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23543 gcc46-pr47967.patch Untested fix. Or is there some better place to check for this earlier? Inlining

[Bug lto/47981] gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 FAILs on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981 --- Comment #2 from Sean McGovern 2011-03-04 13:37:11 UTC --- According to the manpage, cabs() is in libm on Solaris 10.

[Bug target/47989] New: -mrecip causes 482.sphinx3 to miscompare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47989 Summary: -mrecip causes 482.sphinx3 to miscompare Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: una

[Bug middle-end/47990] New: Missed promotion of double precision constants to single precision for -funsafe-math-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47990 Summary: Missed promotion of double precision constants to single precision for -funsafe-math-optimizations Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-

[Bug fortran/47694] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Fortran read from named pipe fails to read all available data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694 --- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-04 14:42:57 UTC --- Final fix was added here: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=170476 For reference when we back port this to 4.5.

[Bug debug/47966] GCC 3.4.6 and 4.4.3 generate wrong stabs debugging information for static file or function scope variables explicitly initialized with 0.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47966 --- Comment #10 from Dainis Jonitis 2011-03-04 14:55:56 UTC --- Actually the same problem is with function scope static variables. int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { static int fvar1; static int fvar2 = 0; static int fvar3 = 1;

[Bug c++/46220] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Error: invalid covariant return type generated for incomplete class type and different qualifer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04 15:18:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 15:17:55 2011 New Revision: 170676 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170676 Log: PR c++/46220 * search.c (check_final_overri

[Bug c++/47971] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11725 on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04 15:18:12 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Mar 4 15:18:07 2011 New Revision: 170677 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170677 Log: PR c++/47971 * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)

[Bug c++/47971] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11725 on valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] missing optimization on const addr area store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug target/47977] powerpc (-mcpu=8548) Wrong code for double operations in little endian mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47977 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-04 15:35:20 UTC --- On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, m.lazzarotto at robox dot it wrote: > My target is effectively an e500v2. > I also tried to pass -mabi=spe, with no difference in the output. > Is

[Bug middle-end/47990] Missed promotion of double precision constants to single precision for -funsafe-math-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47990 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-04 15:42:39 UTC --- On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > In 482.sphinx3 we have code like > > float foo (float x, float y) > { > return ((int)(x/y + 0.5)) * y; > } >

[Bug target/47372] [x32] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horak 2011-03-04 15:46:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23544 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23544 preprocessed source file got the same ICE when building xulrunner on Fedora 15 on s390x with gcc version

[Bug fortran/47984] Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/47957] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Type mismatch when a class derived a same name with template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-04 16:01:03 UTC --- Sure.

[Bug target/47989] -mrecip causes 482.sphinx3 and 464.h264ref to miscompare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47989 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/33928] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] 30% performance slowdown in floating-point code caused by r118475

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928 --- Comment #116 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-03-04 16:09:13 UTC --- On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:59 +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928 > > --- Comment #115 from Richard Guenther >

[Bug rtl-optimization/33928] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] 30% performance slowdown in floating-point code caused by r118475

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928 --- Comment #117 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-03-04 16:14:55 UTC --- On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, lucier at math dot purdue.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928 > > --- Comment #116 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011

Re: [Bug c/47980] Inefficient code for local const char arrays

> I believe f could do: > assert (arg != "aoeuaoeuaeouaeouaoeuaoeaoxbxod"); > which would then fail with the proposed optimization. It is unspecified if > two string literals with the same content are distinct objects, but foo must > be > a distinct object (ok, with static const char foo[] = >

[Bug middle-end/47980] Inefficient code for local const char arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-04 16:26:06 UTC --- > I believe f could do: > assert (arg != "aoeuaoeuaeouaeouaoeuaoeaoxbxod"); > which would then fail with the proposed optimization. It is unspecified if > two string literals with the

[Bug target/47372] [x32] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug fortran/47984] Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #31 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-04 17:37:23 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Fri Mar 4 17:37:11 2011 New Revision: 170679 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170679 Log: PR 47802 Update doc for CTIME and FDATE intrinsics

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #32 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-04 17:52:43 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Fri Mar 4 17:52:10 2011 New Revision: 170680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170680 Log: PR 47802 Hack to work around draft POSIX localtime_

[Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20

[Bug debug/47991] New: [4.6 Regression] Var-tracking ICE on s390x *setmem_long insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Var-tracking ICE on s390x *setmem_long insn Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug debug/47991] [4.6 Regression] Var-tracking ICE on s390x *setmem_long insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/47991] [4.6 Regression] Var-tracking ICE on s390x *setmem_long insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 18:37:41 UTC --- Created attachment 23545 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23545 gcc46-pr47991.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/47372] [x32] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 18:40:04 UTC --- s390 bug moved to PR47991.

[Bug lto/47497] [4.6 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to link with LTO -fuse-linker-plugin -fwhole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-04 18:49:27 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Mar 4 18:49:23 2011 New Revision: 170682 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170682 Log: PR lto/47497 * lto-symtab.c (lto_cgraph_re

[Bug lto/47497] [4.6 Regression] SPEC CPU 2006 failed to link with LTO -fuse-linker-plugin -fwhole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47984] Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich 2011-03-04 18:58:06 UTC --- Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid. You may very well be correct, but please explain. I am not such a Fortran expert, so I may have missed something her

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #33 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-04 19:07:53 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Fri Mar 4 19:07:49 2011 New Revision: 170683 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170683 Log: PR 47802 Use builtins to check localtime_r return t

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #34 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-03-04 19:15:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > Please shout loudly if there you still encounter a build failure! > > > > > > TO BE DONE:

[Bug fortran/47984] Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2011-03-04 19:16:27 UTC --- On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:58:19PM +, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 > > --- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich > 201

[Bug fortran/47984] Pointer dummy argument mismatch not detected by Fortran compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-04 19:39:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid. > You may very well be correct, but please explain. I am not such a > Fortran expert, so I

[Bug rtl-optimization/47992] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in ira_reuse_stack_slot (ira-color.c:2887) with -fweb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in ira_reuse_stack_slot (ira-color.c:2887) with -fweb Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47993] New: `internal error: Killed'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47993 Summary: `internal error: Killed' Product: gcc Version: 4.3.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug debug/47994] New: -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fpeel-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-web

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47994 Summary: -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fpeel-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-web Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/47992] ICE: SIGSEGV in ira_reuse_stack_slot (ira-color.c:2887) with -fweb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-04 20:02:03 UTC --- Seems I forgot to paste the compiler output: $ gcc -O -fno-dce -fgcse -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -funroll-all-loops -wrapper valgrind,-q,--num-callers=40 testcase.f testcas

[Bug libgcj/46263] without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=....,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46263 --- Comment #1 from Douglas Mencken 2011-03-04 20:05:27 UTC --- With the following patch commands: http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/manulix/scripts/build-scripts/PATCHCMDS/patchcmds-gcc GCC v 4.6.0 builds fine (snapshot 20110226). For those of you, who

[Bug libgcj/46263] without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=....,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46263 --- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken 2011-03-04 20:15:08 UTC --- Oops. Sorry. Wrong bug report. The correct one is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47885 (i.e. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694). Sorry again, but the cor

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug debug/43290] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43290 Ryan Hill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org --- Comment #20 f

[Bug c++/47995] ICE of c++ in gcc-4.5.x at FrameLoader.cpp in WebKit build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47995 --- Comment #1 from Jian Peng 2011-03-04 22:07:40 UTC --- Created attachment 23549 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23549 generated from --save-temps

[Bug target/47995] ICE of c++ in gcc-4.5.x at FrameLoader.cpp in WebKit build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47995 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Version|unkn

[Bug c++/47996] New: Bug in atomicity.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47996 Summary: Bug in atomicity.h Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Re

[Bug c++/47996] Bug in atomicity.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47996 coirius at coirius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor

[Bug c++/44629] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:15155

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04 22:24:30 UTC --- Created attachment 23550 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23550 WIP patch to accept my testcase Here's a patch that makes my testcase work. I don't want to put it

[Bug c++/44629] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in unify, at cp/pt.c:15155

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04 22:30:16 UTC --- Created attachment 23551 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23551 WIP patch to make the testcase sorry as before And here's a patch that just restores the previous so

[Bug rtl-optimization/47899] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Dvorak 2011-03-04 22:41:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks, this patch seems to work (I've bootstrapped/regtested it on > x86_64-linux and i686-linux together with the #c3 testcase with > /* PR rtl-optimizatio

[Bug rtl-optimization/47899] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 22:44:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Thanks, this patch seems to work (I've bootstrapped/regtested it on > > x86_64-linux and i686-linux together with the #c3 testca

[Bug target/47995] ICE of c++ in gcc-4.5.x at FrameLoader.cpp in WebKit build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47995 --- Comment #2 from Jian Peng 2011-03-04 22:44:56 UTC --- Here is simpler testing program, first, unzip FrameLoader.ii.tar.bz2 (attached last time), then $ mipsel-linux-c++ -c FrameLoader.ii -o FrameLoader.o -O2 -fPIC -fno-exceptions -fvisibilit

[Bug target/47755] VSX code generates a TOC reference to clear memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47755 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-04 22:45:43 UTC --- Created attachment 23552 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23552 Patch to tighten up V2DI constants.

[Bug target/47755] VSX code generates a TOC reference to clear memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47755 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2011-03-04 22:59:10 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Mar 4 22:59:07 2011 New Revision: 170687 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170687 Log: PR target/47986 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2011-03-04 23:04:23 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Mar 4 23:04:20 2011 New Revision: 170688 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170688 Log: PR target/47986 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/47967] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: conversion of register to a different size with -fipa-cp on undefined code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-04 23:07:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Mar 4 23:07:20 2011 New Revision: 170689 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170689 Log: PR tree-optimization/47967 * ipa-cp.c (buil

[Bug tree-optimization/47967] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: conversion of register to a different size with -fipa-cp on undefined code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47967 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #34 from Mikael Morin 2011-03-04 23:14:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > My only remark is about the test in comment #31 for which > the dg-warning in > [...] > should be moved to the line above: > > and the block > [...] > tha

[Bug c++/47996] Bug in atomicity.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47996 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-03-04 23:37:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am not sure to understand comment #2. You're right, assumed shapes are only for procedure arguments. For derived types components the syntax is the same, bu

[Bug fortran/45797] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in gfc_use_derived

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45797 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-03-04 23:49:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > The patch in comment #2 fixes the ICE, but yields several more errors: Yes, because without the patch gfortran was killed before finishing parsing (and throwi

[Bug fortran/47878] [4.6 Regression] 187.facerec miscompares

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47878 --- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-05 00:05:40 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Mar 5 00:05:34 2011 New Revision: 170692 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170692 Log: 2011-03-04 Jakub Jelinek Backport from

[Bug fortran/47694] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Fortran read from named pipe fails to read all available data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-05 00:05:40 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Mar 5 00:05:34 2011 New Revision: 170692 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170692 Log: 2011-03-04 Jakub Jelinek Backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/37916] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] SSA names causing register pressure; unnecessarily many simultaneously "live" names.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37916 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/38059] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Compile time regression for gcc.dg/20020425-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38059 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/47694] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Fortran read from named pipe fails to read all available data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694 --- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-05 00:21:21 UTC --- Fixed on 4.5 and trunk, I am preparing a back port for 4.4.

  1   2   >