http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47854
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-23
08:58:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 23 08:58:16 2011
New Revision: 170434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170434
Log:
PR libgomp/47854
* libgomp.texi (omp_get_wt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-23
09:04:03 UTC ---
The problem is that for
integer,parameter :: C_INDEX(8) = unpack( &
vector = [(i,i=1,size(SENSOR_CHANNEL))], &
mask = [(any(SENSOR_CHANNEL(i) == NLTE_CHANNEL), &
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47794
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47855
Summary: missed cbnz optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47856
Summary: PowerPC: Wrong assembler output with -mcpu=8540 -meabi
-msdata -fno-common -mfloat-gprs=double -mspe
-mabi=spe
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47857
Summary: Pragma once warning when compiling PCH
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47819
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47814
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke
2011-02-23 12:31:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> lexer_line as well as the other problematic symbols are defined in
> gengtype-lex.c:
> nm build/gengtype-lex.o | egrep 'yybegin|yyend|lexer_line'
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47814
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-23
13:34:25 UTC ---
There are several issues. First as Jakub noted we have a NULL DECL_INITAL
for the inlined __MAIN. If we fix that during LTO streaming (avoiding direct
input/output of DECL_INITIAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of
debug info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
13:41:24 UTC ---
any reason the change didn't make it into Boost 1.46.0 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
Summary: Makefile: Input/output error. Stop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
14:15:17 UTC ---
This is not a bug in gcc, it suggests a disk error or some other problem with
your machine. Check /var/log/messages at the time of the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
14:21:20 UTC ---
Also, is the error repeatable? Does it happen every time you run 'make'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-23 14:28:38 UTC ---
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01453.html
Patch resolves ctime.c build. However, _REENTRANT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
--- Comment #3 from yu 2011-02-23 14:29:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Also, is the error repeatable? Does it happen every time you run 'make'?
It has been 'make' for about more than 1 hour when this error occurs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-23 14:30:15 UTC ---
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Patch which should hopefully fix the getpwuid_r issue on HP-UX 10.2:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/ms
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
--- Comment #4 from yu 2011-02-23 14:31:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Also, is the error repeatable? Does it happen every time you run 'make'?
>
> It has been 'make' for about more than 1 hour when this error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46911
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-23
14:35:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23443
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23443
prototype patch
Patch also trying to fix PR47799 (but we'll still have multiple copies of
the BLO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47860
Summary: is vectorization of "condition in nested loop"
supported
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-02-23 15:51:11
UTC ---
I can confirm the bug for gcc version 4.4.6 20110222 (prerelease) (GCC)
In pass .168r.asmcons we have
(insn 92 57 93 4 pr46779-1.c:17 (set (subreg:QI (reg/v:HI 85 [ w.30 ]) 1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2011-02-23
15:53:56 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Feb 23 15:53:48 2011
New Revision: 170439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170439
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47838
* gcc.dg/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47860
--- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-02-23 16:32:36 UTC ---
it seems that there is a problem in the use of "unsigned int":
shall I open a different bug report?
even a simple comparison fails to vectorize
float amin(float * c, unsigned i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46868
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd 2011-02-23
16:44:25 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Wed Feb 23 16:44:18 2011
New Revision: 170440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170440
Log:
fix PR c++/46868
gcc/cp/
PR c++/46868
* pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
Summary: static variables inside member functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47849
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-23
16:50:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 23 16:49:52 2011
New Revision: 170441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170441
Log:
2011-02-23 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47846
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862
Summary: Incorrect code for spilling a vector register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #4 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-23 17:56:54 UTC ---
The original failing process was:
../../env/src/configure --prefix=${HOME}/local --with-mpc=${HOME}/local
--with-mpfr=${HOME}/local --with-gmp=${HOME}/local --with-ppl=${HOME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43810
--- Comment #17 from Nathan Froyd 2011-02-23
18:06:38 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Wed Feb 23 18:06:29 2011
New Revision: 170443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170443
Log:
PR target/43810
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43810
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46868
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-23
18:24:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Patch resolves ctime.c build. However, _REENTRANT is not defined,
> so there are various warnings regarding the declaration of reentrant
> functions such
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant 2011-02-23
18:30:19 UTC ---
> Does not work for `_Z3fooi.1988' or
> `_Z3fooi.part.9.165493.constprop.775.31805'.
Where does the _Z3fooi.1988 style come from?
I guess your second example is from a cloned function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47863
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/allocate_deferred_char_scalar_1.f03
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47863
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de, pault at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47846
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-23
18:51:53 UTC ---
See pr47863.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-02-23 19:03:36
UTC ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
>
> --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant 2011-02-23
> 18:30:19 UTC ---
> > Does not work for `_Z3fooi.1988' or
> > `_Z3fooi.part.9.165
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47846
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47863
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-23
20:11:09 UTC ---
>--enable-languages=c,c++
Where you really able to build libstdc++ without libc? I doubt that. Try just
enabling C first and then build newlib. Or are you building a combined
compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-23 20:15:34 UTC ---
> As there localtime_r is also used in intrinsics/date_and_time.c, I would
> assume
> that one sees the same message there.
Yes. I see them for all _r uses.
> I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #2 from michal.tlk at gmail dot com 2011-02-23 20:45:23 UTC ---
Yep a warning stating the similarity of a static member function variable to
its counterpart as a static member would be appreciated...maybe when
pedantic option is going t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
20:55:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yep a warning stating the similarity of a static member function variable to
> its counterpart as a static member would be appreciated...maybe when
> pedan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
20:57:57 UTC ---
As requested, please provide a code example showing what you mean, and explain
what warning you would like to be issued.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-23
21:19:56 UTC ---
Also it is hard to produce a warning when it comes to a failure that will only
be diagnostic at link time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-23
21:22:34 UTC ---
Are you building of NFS also? "make[4]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your
build may be incomplete." Usually means your clock and the server clock don't
match up correctly. And the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
21:28:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Also it is hard to produce a warning when it comes to a failure that will only
> be diagnostic at link time.
IIUC I think the OP wants a warning for:
str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47864
Summary: incorrect control reaches end of non-void function
(switch+break+default)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ami at fischman dot org
--- Comment #28 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
Summary: [4.6 Regression] exception_defines.h: No such file or
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-23
22:32:17 UTC ---
I don't think this is a bug. exception_defines.h is an internal header file
which is not supposed to be included by an issue program.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-23
22:38:31 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Wed Feb 23 22:38:27 2011
New Revision: 170445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170445
Log:
2011-02-23 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/40850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c fails on IA64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #31
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
--- Comment #29 from Ami Fischman 2011-02-23 23:35:45
UTC ---
Further reduced test case from dup bug 47864:
$ nl t.cc ; g++ -finstrument-functions -Wreturn-type -Werror -c t.cc
1 int foo(int type) {
2switch(type) {
3 case
-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/gnu/bin/as
--enable-shared --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu --prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.6
--with-gmp=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.6.0 --enable-threads=posix --enable-debug=no
--disable-nls --without-cloog --without-ppl
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java,ada,obj-c++,lto
Thread model: p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47868
Summary: Compiling support files...xgcc: fatal error:
-fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Richard Nolde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.nolde at cybox dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
Perry Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedzsan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47865
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47770
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-02-24 02:20:56
UTC ---
It seems most of the exec failures disappeared between r170436 and r170443 -
that is, probably by the fix for PR47849.
Running testsuite (languages=c,c++,lto,fortran) with
RUNTESTFLAG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47869
Summary: fatal error: build/gencondmd.c: No such file or
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #8 from Josh Haberman 2011-02-24
03:27:04 UTC ---
I found another test case for this. I thought I'd post it since it's extremely
different than the original one.
--
class Foo {
public:
virtual ~Foo() {}
virtual void DoSomethin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-24
04:52:05 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Feb 24 04:52:00 2011
New Revision: 170458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170458
Log:
2011-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-24
05:10:41 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Feb 24 05:10:37 2011
New Revision: 170461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170461
Log:
2011-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_alias_set, at
alias.c:716
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47870
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-02-24 05:33:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 23446
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23446
Preprocessed source files in .tar.lz archive
I tried to minimize the testcase with Delta, but unf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47871
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in list_length, at
tree.c:2089
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47872
Summary: Alternative syntax for intrinsics should be documented
on separate line
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
Summary: Multiple Inheritance - Covariant Virtual Function -
Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47874
Summary: Multiple Inheritance - Virtual Function - Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47875
Summary: What's new section in GFortran wiki page: Wrong
function name: TAN2.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47876
Summary: Host-assoc generic subroutine plus intrinsic function
not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47860
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
91 matches
Mail list logo
