http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-18
08:48:00 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Feb 18 08:47:56 2011
New Revision: 170268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170268
Log:
PR c++/47208
gcc/cp/
PR c++/47208
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2011-02-18 09:11:01
UTC ---
See bug 4334 for an old example. Or bugs 921/1646/2175/2176 for another one.
These are the only pre-existing binutils/gdb examples.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 10:04:33 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Feb 18 10:04:30 2011
New Revision: 170269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170269
Log:
2011-02-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 10:12:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Janus, Paul: Do you think the patch in comment 5 (with added "||") is OK? Or
> does one need to take care about thinks like intrinsics, proc-pointer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-18
10:13:40 UTC ---
Great - I guess it's up to a gthreads maintainer whether they are happy to fix
the typo in the existing function name or want to fix it by adding a new
function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
Summary: Debug: Odd first break point for subroutine breakp w/
allocatables
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-debug
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47789
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47780
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
10:42:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 18 10:42:48 2011
New Revision: 170270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170270
Log:
PR debug/47780
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
10:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Created attachment 23390 [details]
> Patch that kills the bug harder
While with the previous patch gcc didn't profiledbootstrap on s390-linux, nor
apparen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47780
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47737
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|rguenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2011-02-18 11:06:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Janus, Paul: Do you think the patch in comment 5 (with added "||") is OK? Or
> > does one need to take care about thinks like intr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47764
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47737
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-18
11:41:40 UTC ---
The code tries to use existing dominance information to answer the edge
dominance question but indeed gets it wrong by using the dest/src blocks
of the edges without verifying that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47795
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47787
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 12:24:01 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Feb 18 12:23:56 2011
New Revision: 170271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170271
Log:
2011-02-18 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #51 from Martin Jambor 2011-02-18
12:30:08 UTC ---
I tried again on a machine with more RAM and LTO build succeeded for me as
well. Thanks a lot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47798
Summary: LTO debuginfo for globals wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47737
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-18
13:22:21 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 18 13:22:17 2011
New Revision: 170272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170272
Log:
2011-02-18 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47737
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
Summary: LTO debug info for early inlined functions missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-18 14:05:00
UTC ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-33 ilp32-24]$ cat x.i
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
typedef long int ssize_t;
typedef ssize_t index_type;
typedef __int128_t GFC_INTEGER_16;
typedef struct de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800
Summary: [4.6 Regression] i?86 peephole related ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47801
Summary: guality tests have issues with LTO / -fwhole-program
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
15:11:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 23394
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23394
gcc46-pr47800-1.patch
The problem is that for QImode and HImode the peephole2 creates the first of
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47789
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
15:19:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 23395
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23395
gcc46-pr47800-2.patch
Or just do the first insn completely in QI/HImode and the second in SImode, as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718
--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin 2011-02-18
15:53:42 UTC ---
So if I understand correctly, this case is rare enough to not care?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47750
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-18
16:04:15 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Feb 18 16:04:10 2011
New Revision: 170273
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170273
Log:
2011-02-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47750
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47798
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-18
16:24:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 18 16:24:40 2011
New Revision: 170274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170274
Log:
2011-02-18 Richard Guenther
PR lto/477
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47798
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
Summary: libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few
arguments to function 'ctime_r'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47795
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
Summary: [F95+] Constant inquiry function rejected in PARAMETER
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47804
Summary: libgomp LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't include path to
libgfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #14 from John T 2011-02-18 16:58:45 UTC
---
Sorry for not responding sooner, had a health issue.
Here's the error message with the -static flag:
gfortran -g -o testieee tstiee.o
gfortran -fimplicit-none -g -static -O -c ilaver.f -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805
Summary: [OOP] Overridding hidden (private) TPB is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-18
17:05:35 UTC ---
Forgot to link to http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html
which is about the J3 ballot of those items; it also contains an updated
version of the paper.
The IR ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47803
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-18
17:07:03 UTC ---
Forgot to link to http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2011-February/004197.html
which is about the J3 ballot of those items; it also contains an updated
version of the paper.
The IR ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47787
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47806
Summary: Failure to build cross-combiner to powerpc-ibm-aix6.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47806
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-18
17:11:58 UTC ---
... and the gthread maintainer is? (should be also in CC).
Arguably, this PR could be also re-categorized as something non-libstdc++, like
target or other, I don't know.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47795
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:22:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 18 17:22:14 2011
New Revision: 170275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170275
Log:
/cp
2011-02-18 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47806
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2011-02-18
17:23:44 UTC ---
Also fails, but in a different way, if "--disable-multilib" is removed from the
configure options:
# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
# multilibs.
/home/steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47795
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-18 17:24:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 18 17:24:29 2011
New Revision: 170276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170276
Log:
/cp
2011-02-18 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46178
--- Comment #1 from Chung-Lin Tang 2011-02-18
17:26:37 UTC ---
Author: cltang
Date: Fri Feb 18 17:26:31 2011
New Revision: 170277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170277
Log:
2011-02-18 Chung-Lin Tang
PR rtl-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47795
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47794
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47807
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |target
--- Comment #11 from John Davi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47807
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
17:57:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 18 17:57:47 2011
New Revision: 170279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170279
Log:
PR bootstrap/47807
* Make-lang.in (lto/lto-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-18 18:28:13
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=168211
removed all the uses of int_cst_value and replaced them with
tree_int_to_gmp, and here is what happens:
Breakpoint 5, scan_tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47808
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy_and_build, at
cp/pt.c:13326
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7291 [4.6]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47804
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-18 18:54:59 UTC ---
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Created attachment 23397
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23397
> gcc46-pr47804.patch
Works
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47810
Summary: [4.6 Regression] New LTO/debug failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47807
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin 2011-02-18
19:02:34 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Feb 18 19:02:31 2011
New Revision: 170281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170281
Log:
PR target/47792
* gthr-dce.h (__gthr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47792
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47811
Summary: ARM asm branch to direct address
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18
19:13:06 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 18 19:13:03 2011
New Revision: 170282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170282
Log:
Add ix86_simplify_base_disp and use it for x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47655
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-18 19:38:32
UTC ---
*** Bug 47655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #48 from Michael Matz 2011-02-18 19:52:19
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Feb 18 19:52:16 2011
New Revision: 170284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170284
Log:
PR fortran/45586
* gfortran.h (struct gfc_co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47789
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47811
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-18
20:29:02 UTC ---
Also I think b takes a relative address.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-18
20:32:51 UTC ---
We generated now:
.cfi_startproc
movzbl(%eax), %ecx
addl%ecx, %edx
andl$-4, %ecx
andl$3, %edx
orl%edx, %ecx
movb%cl, (%eax)
ret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-18 20:42:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 23400
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23400
first patch
This patch works around the bug by undoing the transform.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47804
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
20:44:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 18 20:44:44 2011
New Revision: 170285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170285
Log:
PR libgomp/47804
* testsuite/libgomp.fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-18
20:44:52 UTC ---
Sorry, #c1 is a false alarm, git bisect pilot error. The failure is caused by
r170260.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47790
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23391|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47666
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-18 20:56:54 UTC ---
> Is there no way to get a posix compliant ctime? Alternatively, we'll need
> autoconf magic to detect the extra arg. I know at one time it was relatively
> common, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-18
21:16:03 UTC ---
By the way the conditions should not test against
a->expr->symtree->n.sym->as->type
as it does not support derived type components.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47787
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-18
21:17:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 18 21:17:14 2011
New Revision: 170286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170286
Log:
PR driver/47787
* gcc.c (default_compilers)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47787
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45797
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-18
21:35:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Feb 18 21:35:44 2011
New Revision: 170289
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170289
Log:
2011-02-18 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4777
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
