http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Summary: libgfortran quadmath_weak.h not found on NetBSD 5.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47648
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-13
09:48:57 UTC ---
Possibly related: PR 47716. (Same symptoms on NetBSD 5.1 - but it fails on
x86-64 while for FreeBSD it only fails on ia64 while [cf. PR 47642] x86-64
works.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-13
10:11:39 UTC ---
It looks like some SSA rewriting is missing for the parameter.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-13
10:11:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Submitted patch (with some modifications):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-02/msg00087.html
Mikael pointed out that I have probably misread the standa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
Summary|[4.5, 4.6 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45623
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonhf at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47705
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46611
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #46 from Martin Jambor 2011-02-13
12:41:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> Can you try mozilla-central revision 19f13dea4d4a?
With that revision the elfhack problems are gone. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47717
Summary: building library for arm-none-eabi causes internal
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718
Summary: bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly
linked to GCC bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
nux-gnueabi-gcc-4.6.0 (Gentoo SVN) 4.6.0-pre9999 20110213
(experimental) rev. 170108
$ arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.6.0 -I. -I"/home/mru/src/ffmpeg.dev"
-D_ISOC99_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon
-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-13
15:57:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Here's a patch that fixes the problem. Jakub, is it easy for you to test it
> on
> the affected platforms? Please? :-) TIA,
Profiledootstrapped/regteste
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #52 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-13
16:31:36 UTC ---
Even those this problem appears latent on gcc-4_5-branch, the problematic code
is identical. Shouldn't we backport this for gcc 4.5.3?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-13 17:01:13
UTC ---
Another one:
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-14]$ cat s.c
struct initial_sp
{
void *sp;
long len;
};
__thread struct initial_sp __morestack_initial_sp;
void bar (void *);
void
foo ()
{
bar (&__mores
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47704
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47666
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
Summary: problems with makefile dependency generation using -M
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
--- Comment #53 from mrs at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #54 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-13
18:56:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> I'd rather know two things, that we have a lot of time on the new code and it
> works fine znd why the branch doesn't have the problem in similar cases. If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-13
19:26:27 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 13 19:26:24 2011
New Revision: 170110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170110
Log:
2011-02-13 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
Summary: [C++0x] Updated friendship rules?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #55 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-13
20:29:49 UTC ---
It appears that is was present at r162030 and the r162035 used
--enable-build-with-cxx...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg00872.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.4.6
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-13
21:01:40 UTC ---
--disable-libquadmath-support was enough to build.
However gfortran test results are pretty poor:
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes24669
# o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-13
21:14:50 UTC ---
They're right, see
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1791.pdf
Documented as unimplemented at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47722
Summary: problem with -static option on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
Summary: internal compiler: Segmentation fault - gcc 4.5.2 Arch
Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
Summary: Regex string anchors cause segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #1 from Zack Weinberg 2011-02-13 23:27:10
UTC ---
> I have run the build a second time and it makes it past the point
> where it segfaulted,
This means your problem is almost certainly *not* a bug in GCC, but rather a
hardware fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #56 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-13
23:29:01 UTC ---
A regression hunt reveals the PR47324 was actually triggered by...
r160124 | hubicka | 2010-06-01 17:55:49 -0400 (Tue, 01 Jun 2010) | 4 lines
* ipa-pure-const.c (local_pure_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-13
23:29:40 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 13 23:29:34 2011
New Revision: 170116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170116
Log:
Properly support TLS symbol in ix86_expand_m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-14
00:07:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I have created a tar.bz2 of the src/kcontrol/konq directory (which I hope is
> what you need) and I've attached it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ says we wan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-14
00:11:06 UTC ---
Thanks Jon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #6 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-14 00:40:19 UTC ---
Author: gerald
Date: Mon Feb 14 00:40:15 2011
New Revision: 170121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170121
Log:
PR target/45808
* config/freeb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
Summary: [x32] error: unable to find a register to spill in
class DIREG
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43157
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-14 01:28:08
UTC ---
I think this is similar to PR 47449.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-14 03:04:29
UTC ---
I am testing this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 5e1236b..78f3089 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -2138,6 +2138,12 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47726
Summary: language go can not build for mingw target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@air
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #57 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-14
03:21:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23330
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23330
assembly for eh-alloca.1 at r160123 with -O3 -g (working)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #58 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-14
03:21:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 23331
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23331
assembly for eh-alloca.1 at r160124 with -O3 -g (failing)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #59 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-14
03:23:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 23332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23332
diff in assembly for eh-alloca.1 at r160123 vs r160124 both with -O3 -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-14 03:36:51
UTC ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00599a9f in init_alias_analysis ()
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/alias.c:2863
2863 else if (DF_REG_DEF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-14 03:53:52
UTC ---
cse1 generates:
;; Succ edge EXIT [100.0%] (fallthru)
;; Insn is not within a basic block
(insn 63 57 64 (set (reg:SI 100)
(symbol_ref:SI ("__CTOR_END__") [flags 0x2] )) -1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-14 04:19:03
UTC ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00858.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-14 05:18:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> cse1 generates:
>
> ;; Succ edge EXIT [100.0%] (fallthru)
>
> ;; Insn is not within a basic block
> (insn 63 57 64 (set (reg:SI 100)
> (symbol_ref:SI (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Summary|[x32] internal co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-14
06:38:48 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Feb 14 06:38:44 2011
New Revision: 170123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170123
Log:
2011-02-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
66 matches
Mail list logo
