http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47710
Summary: [OOP] Improve ambiguity check for TBP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #45 from Mike Hommey 2011-02-12
09:32:34 UTC ---
Can you try mozilla-central revision 19f13dea4d4a?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23062|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47710
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-12
09:47:53 UTC ---
The first example is rejected by ifort (12.0? with a warning - but works) and
NAG (5.1, 5.2? - error); crayftn and gfortran accept it.
The second example by Janus is accepted by gfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
Vanuan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Vanuan at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47707
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #41 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-12
12:02:27 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Feb 12 12:02:24 2011
New Revision: 170070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170070
Log:
ChangeLog:
PR lto/47225
* Makefile.def (lto-plu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-12
12:06:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 23313
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23313
a.c
I'm attaching a few testcases I've used (well, they aren't suitable for gcc
testsuite because m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-12
12:07:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 23314
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23314
b.c
Testcase from the *.texi.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-12
12:08:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23315
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23315
c.c
Testcase from stripped down glibc stdio-common/tst-printf.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-12
12:13:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 23316
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23316
d.c
Testcase for the localization stuff. Strangely the farsi output for %Ie looks
garbled, while %
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-12
13:05:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23317
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23317
Patch that fixes the bug
Here's a patch that fixes the problem. Jakub, is it easy for you to test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #45 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-12
13:09:06 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Feb 12 13:09:03 2011
New Revision: 170072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170072
Log:
2011-02-12 Michael Matz
Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #46 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-12
13:12:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> New Revision: 170072
That patch fixed the issue of comment 40 to comment 44.
TODO: The actual restrict patch of comment 35 (attachment 23047), taking int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Olaf van der Spek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43759
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-12
13:54:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> this is fixed on the trunk
Any plan to backport the fix to 4.5? or should this pr closed as fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-12
14:17:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 23318
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23318
gcc46-pr47642-2.patch
Incremental patch to fix also wprintf/etc. (wide orientation) and %IQe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #47 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-12
14:56:35 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Feb 12 14:56:32 2011
New Revision: 170074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170074
Log:
2011-02-12 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/45586
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
Olaf van der Spek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-02-12
15:48:34 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Feb 12 15:48:30 2011
New Revision: 170076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170076
Log:
Import move-if-change script from gnulib.
/:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #50 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-12 16:52:01
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Feb 12 16:51:58 2011
New Revision: 170077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170077
Log:
gcc:
PR target/47324
* dwarf2out.c (output_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Summary: [4.5, 4.6 Regression] (even trivial) PCH fails for
Objective-C++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-12 17:24:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 23320
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23320
simple test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12
17:36:47 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Feb 12 17:36:45 2011
New Revision: 170080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170080
Log:
Support 32bit address in x32 mode.
2011-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12
17:37:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Feb 12 17:37:46 2011
New Revision: 170081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170081
Log:
Use ptr_mode instead of targetm.addr_space.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47712
Summary: optimization (-O) of code using union unexpectedly
causes essential code to be optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47617
--- Comment #9 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-12 18:20:03 UTC ---
Hi folks,
I tried the asm("":"+X"(source)); as shown. I get an error: inconsistent
operand constraints in an ‘asm’.
The info pages make it look like this should work, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
Anitha Boyapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anitha.boyapati at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-12
18:36:03 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Feb 12 18:35:59 2011
New Revision: 170084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170084
Log:
2011-02-12 Jakub Jelinek
Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-12
19:07:43 UTC ---
The patch in comment #8 fixes this pr but also pr45244.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-12
19:24:21 UTC ---
The file was added for PR 47523.
The issue is that there is no temporary generated - but the LHS is dependent on
the LHS. This should only occur for "LHS = LHS(substring)" where no te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Eric.Zurcher at csiro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-02-12 20:27:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 23321
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23321
potential fix
With this patch, ld doesn't check the arch/mach/lang/etc. of dummy IR-only BFDs
any more.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-12 21:26:24 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Feb 12 21:26:21 2011
New Revision: 170089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170089
Log:
2011-02-12 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-12 21:27:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Feb 12 21:26:58 2011
New Revision: 170090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170090
Log:
2011-02-12 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45731
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-02-12
21:29:18 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Feb 12 21:29:14 2011
New Revision: 170091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170091
Log:
PR driver/45731
* gcc.c (asm_options): Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45731
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47713
Summary: String comparison optimization with LLE and friends
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47713
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl
2011-02-13 00:05:09 UTC ---
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:29:47PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
>
> Thomas Koenig changed:
>
>What|Remo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Summary: verify_ssa fails with error: invalid argument to
gimple call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor 2011-02-13
00:54:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23324
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23324
Testcase minimized with multidelta
Testcase minimized with multidelta, also fails at any optimizatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
Summary: [x32] TLS doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-02-13
00:59:04 UTC ---
Backtrace always leads to SSA verification:
(gdb) bt
#0 verify_gimple_call (stmt=0x76970aa0) at
/home/mjambor/gcc/trunk/src/gcc/tree-cfg.c:3137
#1 0x0095bcc7 in verify_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-13
01:18:35 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 13 01:18:32 2011
New Revision: 170099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170099
Log:
Remove DI on operand 1 in tls_global_dynamic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
60 matches
Mail list logo