[Bug c/47530] New: [trans-mem] tail call optimization problem with _ITM_commitTransaction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 Summary: [trans-mem] tail call optimization problem with _ITM_commitTransaction Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/47531] New: SHAPE misses KIND= support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531 Summary: SHAPE misses KIND= support Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug lto/47532] New: valgrind errors while compiling with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47532 Summary: valgrind errors while compiling with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug rtl-optimization/47521] [Regression 4.4/4.5/4.6] Unnecessary usage of edx register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47521 Tony Poppleton changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unnecessary usage of edx|[Regression 4.4/4.5/4.6]

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-29 11:48:04 UTC --- For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc. I'm sure these semantics are not identical across

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 --- Comment #17 from Gerald Pfeifer 2011-01-29 11:57:55 UTC --- Thanks, Dominique. I think it'll be great if you can add i386-*-freebsd*. I'll be happy to test a patch, but I think in this specific case it's just fine if you commit and we'll ha

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-01-29 12:02:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise > semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc. I'm sure these > s

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-29 12:04:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise > semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc. [...] This is PR > 4260

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-01-29 12:14:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think it would be useful to give an example Makefile file in the manual. > Joost's solution (comment 2) seems to work fine, though I am not sure how >

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-29 12:20:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > b) A .mod file is read when a USE statement is encountered; the file must > exist > and is searched for in the include search paths. With any kind of mod

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-01-29 12:36:01 UTC --- BTW, there is one thing I would still like to add, but I have not yet tried. gfortran -fsyntax-only test.f90 will generate all .mod files 'defined' by test.f90 This seems like

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-29 13:10:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > b) A .mod file is read when a USE statement is encountered; the file > > must exist and is searched for in the include search paths. > > With any kind of

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-29 13:28:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > > If you want one rule to update multiple outputs, see > > > > That sound

[Bug fortran/47042] ICE with character pointer in function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47042 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47523] Concatenation with deferred length character with lhs variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47523 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47416] [4.6 Regression] ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/42546] ALLOCATED statement typo in the docs and for scalar variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42546 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/47533] New: [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 Summary: [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation) Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/47478] [4.4 Regression] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/47519] Deferred-length string wrong results with character intrinsic functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47519 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47042] ICE with character pointer in function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47042 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code CC|

[Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-29 17:31:07 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 29 17:31:04 2011 New Revision: 169390 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169390 Log: 2011-01-29 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-29 17:33:39 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 29 17:33:36 2011 New Revision: 169391 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169391 Log: 2011-01-29 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortra

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/47531] SHAPE misses KIND= support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-29 17:36:21 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 29 17:36:18 2011 New Revision: 169392 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169392 Log: 2011-01-29 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/47

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-29 17:37:18 UTC --- Created attachment 23163 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23163 use features in klibc open() and openat(), untested

[Bug fortran/47531] SHAPE misses KIND= support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47531 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-01-29 17:39:42 UTC --- > You don't really say what the error is. Is it that the number after got2 > differs from the one after got1? Yes, it’s a local variable of foo() and bar() and thus not supposed to

[Bug c++/46317] Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of diamond shaped virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #6

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #4 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-01-29 17:53:19 UTC --- I see, now, from the patch. Thanks, will try that. Is it okay with you to submit this to klibc, if it works?

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #5 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-01-29 18:05:47 UTC --- Created attachment 23164 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23164 Mikael’s patch, against klibc git I converted your patch to one against klibc git. I’m building it

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-29 18:27:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I see, now, from the patch. Thanks, will try that. Is it okay with you to > submit this to klibc, if it works? Sure. BTW, glibc uses a similar solution

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/47533] [m68k] stack corruption with -Os (probably due to tail call optimisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47533 --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-01-29 18:51:23 UTC --- OK, the patch fixes the problem indeed. Thanks! (Sorry for the noise, too.)

[Bug bootstrap/47534] New: [regression] avr libgcc.S fails to build

: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: j...@gcc.gnu.org 4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) [trunk revision 169388] /users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/./gcc/xgcc -B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/./gcc/ -nostdinc -B/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1-avr/avr-rtems4.11/newlib/ -isystem /users/joel/test-gcc/b-gcc1

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-01-29 19:31:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > test.mod: test.f90 > gfortran -fsyntax-only test.f90 > > test.o: test.f90 test.mod > gfortran -c -O3 test.f90 > > could speed things up f

[Bug driver/47535] New: -mno-thumb option does not work on ARM compiler configured --with-mode=thumb

uild=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu --target=arm-linux-gnueabi CC=gcc build_alias=i486-linux-gnu host_alias=i486-linux-gnu target_alias=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110129 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='

[Bug rtl-optimization/47477] [4.6 regression] Sub-optimal mov at end of method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-29 19:40:25 UTC --- forwprop is a forward walk, for this kind of optimization we want to walk backwards, from the narrowing integer conversion to the operations and whenever we change some operation see i

[Bug c++/47529] Visibility attributes not supported on Solaris i386 platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46713] -fvisibility=hidden generates broken code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yuri at tsoft dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c/46713] -fvisibility=hidden generates broken code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46713] -fvisibility=hidden generates broken code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713 --- Comment #6 from Yuri 2011-01-29 20:07:34 UTC --- Thanks! You can change the warning message to be a bit more proactive: "visibility attribute not supported in this configuration (as during configuration wasn't from binutils?); ignored"

[Bug boehm-gc/34544] pthread_default_stacksize_np failed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34544 --- Comment #23 from John David Anglin 2011-01-29 20:36:41 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Jan 29 20:36:39 2011 New Revision: 169394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169394 Log: Backport from mainline: 2010-08-22

[Bug fortran/43062] NAMELIST attribute conflicts with ALLOCATABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062 --- Comment #28 from Xavier 2011-01-29 21:47:19 UTC --- I tried again to build gcc 4.6 (from svn) and i succeeded. The patch works fine. Thanks.

[Bug c++/47536] New: gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536 Summary: gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c++/47536] gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-29 21:51:08 UTC --- >Its strange that there is an option -m64 that appears in the command line. Not really because i386-solaris is a multi-arch target which includes amd64 too. Can you attach config.log

[Bug c++/47536] gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536 --- Comment #2 from Yuri 2011-01-29 22:15:45 UTC --- Created attachment 23165 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23165 Requested config.log

[Bug bootstrap/47147] gcc 4.6 fails to compile on NetBSD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-29 22:15:55 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jan 29 22:15:52 2011 New Revision: 169395 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169395 Log: 2011-01-29 Jonathan Wakely PR bootstrap/4

[Bug bootstrap/47147] gcc 4.6 fails to compile on NetBSD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47537] New: [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:635

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47537 Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:635 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/47537] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:635

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47537 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29 22:36:32 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Jan 29 22:36:26 2011 New Revision: 169396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169396 Log: Convert to Pmode if needed in ix86_expand_sp

[Bug c++/47536] gcc-4.5.2 fails to build on Solaris 10 i386

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47536 --- Comment #3 from Yuri 2011-01-29 22:40:09 UTC --- Assembler complains on -xarch option. /opt/local/bin/as: unrecognized option `-xarch=generic64' But '/opt/local/bin/as --help' doeasn't list -xarch as the valid option. It has -march option.

[Bug c/46713] -fvisibility=hidden generates broken code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46713 --- Comment #7 from River Tarnell 2011-01-29 23:09:23 UTC --- I don't agree that this is invalid. If objdump is not found, GCC should either generate an error and fail during build, or continue to build but generate correct code, albeit without

[Bug preprocessor/47499] cpp will not process stdio.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 --- Comment #2 from Daniel S. Wilkerson 2011-01-29 23:27:18 UTC --- So I have tried this. Frankly, Apple makes it too hard to report bugs to them as I have to register as an Apple developer and I'm just not willing to answer all their stupid que

[Bug c/47538] New: GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

-darwin10.7.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20110129/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv

[Bug c/47538] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10 Known to work|

[Bug preprocessor/47499] cpp will not process stdio.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47490] __Unwind_SjLj_Unregister clobbers return value with i586-mingw32msvc-g++ 4.4.4 and -fstack-protector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47490 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-30 01:23:33 UTC --- Fixed on trunk for 4.5 by r146570: Author: uweigand Date: Wed Apr 22 11:31:56 2009 New Revision: 146570 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146570 Log: * fu

[Bug c/47538] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-30 01:49:49 UTC --- Same wrong code generation seen with gcc trunk on x86_64 linux at -O2. On both x86_64-apple-darwin10 and x86_64 linux, compiling gsl-1.14/cheb/integ.c at -O0 eliminates the make check f

[Bug c/47538] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-30 02:03:17 UTC --- On x86_64 linux, gsl-1.14/eigen/herm.c is also miscompiled at optimizations above -O0.

[Bug c/47538] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-30 02:07:23 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the cheb test fails when integ.c is compiled at -O1 at... gdb ./test Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x00010020 0x00012340 in gsl_ch

[Bug c/47539] New: Compile fail at "0x0E+" procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47539 Summary: Compile fail at "0x0E+" procedure Product: gcc Version: 3.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o

[Bug c/47539] Compile fail at "0x0E+" procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47539 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yaxi1984 at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug preprocessor/47499] cpp will not process stdio.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47499 Daniel S. Wilkerson changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug c/47538] GNU Scientific Library miscompiled by gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47538 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-30 03:10:37 UTC --- Interestingly adding all of the options enabled at -O1 to -O0... -O0 -fcombine-stack-adjustments -fcompare-elim -fcprop-registers -fdefer-pop -fforward-propagate -fguess-branch-probabi

[Bug target/47540] New: ARM THUMB crash with complex numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540 Summary: ARM THUMB crash with complex numbers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug target/47540] ARM THUMB crash with complex numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-30 07:57:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23166 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23166 Possible patch This is a possible patch for this bug. It fixes what appears to be an obvious bug