http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47426
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469
Summary: Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses
TBP/PPC attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
Summary: Less-optimized Code Size when using Optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-26
09:57:33 UTC ---
*** Bug 47206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-26
10:17:18 UTC ---
gcc-3.3.2 is ancient and no longer supported upstream. Please try gcc-4.4.5 or
newer. Also you haven't told us which target you're compiling for, or how your
gcc was configured.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-26
10:23:12 UTC ---
This pr is not fixed at revision 169261 (gfc). AFAIU -ftree-loop-linear is now
implemented through graphite. This leads to a sort of regression with respect
to revision 169227(g
++;
}
int main (void) { f (1); return 0; }
---
gcc -o 1 1.c -Wall -g
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110126 (experimental)
FAIL gcc-4.6.0-0.3.fc15.x86_64
PASS gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 20110124 (prerelease)
PASS gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14.x86_64
GNU gdb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
Summary: Rules printed by -M option contains duplicate slash
when -J option is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
10:36:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23130
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23130
Draft patch, working but failing due to another related bug
(In reply to comment #3)
[First patch]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Summary: Incorrect computation with complex numbers when using
-std=c99
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47423
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-26
11:39:21 UTC ---
Ah. gcc/ada/targext.c fails to include config.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #2 from Tomer Levi 2011-01-26
11:43:36 UTC ---
Hi,
The attached assembly was produced on the following machine:
taln36-Amit<1015> gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.1/specs
Configured with: ./configu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-26
12:23:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi,
> The attached assembly was produced on the following machine:
>
> taln36-Amit<1015> gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #43 from Michael Matz 2011-01-26 12:39:04
UTC ---
Yep. With my patch the saner looking
new_person->service.education.person.ss = *ss;
statement is generated. It's possible that class containers actually contain
something as first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #4 from Tomer Levi 2011-01-26
12:47:14 UTC ---
The cross-gcc compiler i'm using is hooking the default GNU verbose message,
hence i can not tell how GCC was exactly configured.
As i alredy said, the issue is reproducible on native GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-26
12:50:57 UTC ---
Try -fno-loop-optimize (or -fno-loop-optimize2 if that is already available).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #6 from Tomer Levi 2011-01-26
13:00:17 UTC ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Actually, -fno-loop-optimize was the first thing i've tried when facing this
issue. However, the generated code is even worse than using -Os alo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
Summary: Wrong code with allocatable scalar, allocatable
components as function result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #7 from Tomer Levi 2011-01-26
13:16:16 UTC ---
Hi,
I was able to test the behavior on GCC 3.4.5 (native):
Here, the -fno-loop-optimize (and -fno-loop-optimize2) generate an optimized
code as expected. Unfortunately, i don't have a GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
13:21:46 UTC ---
Simplified testcase:
extern __thread int t;
void
foo (int a)
{
t = a;
}
Looking at it in detail, not sure if the bug isn't earlier.
Seems the expander isn't extra careful about r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. La
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-26
14:20:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This pr is not fixed at revision 169261 (gfc). AFAIU -ftree-loop-linear is now
> implemented through graphite. This leads to a sort of regression with respec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 14:26:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I've commited patch fixing the testcase. H.J., can you please confirm that the
> LTO 32bit faiulres are gone for you?
Sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46949
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-26
14:43:34 UTC ---
The loop in reload_combine_recognize_const_pattern contains this check:
/* If the add clobbers another hard reg in parallel, don't move
it past a real set of this h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-26
14:46:40 UTC ---
Gold was updated to handle this well for binutils 2.11.1, so H.J.'s branch.
We still have issues with mainline GNU LD. Dave, what about getting this fixed
the gold way?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46948
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5 Regression] ICE: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Summary: Static member function template of class variadic
template can't be called from the inside
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44469
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
15:04:53 UTC ---
Patch. The order was wrong; additionally, if there is an allocatable RESULT
variable, it seems to get zero initialized via sym->value or similarly. Thus
the sym->result == result check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 15:14:10
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 147281:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00255.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
15:19:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23132
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23132
gcc46-pr47473.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
15:34:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 23133
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23133
gcc46-pr42894.patch
The varasm.c alternative (untested).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in
potential_constant_expression_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 14:56:14
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/11 07:51, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
>
> Mikael Pettersson changed:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Summary: [4.6 regression] Sub-optimal mov at end of method
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
16:43:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23134
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23134
gcc46-pr47476.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-26 16:43:43
UTC ---
Joel, can you verify the fix for 46878 fixes his problem on the m68k. I'm
pretty sure it will, but an independent verification would be good.
Thanks,
Jeff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-26
16:47:53 UTC ---
Note that this is not related to variadic templates, this gives the same error
using no C++0x features:
template
struct test;
template<>
struct test
{
template
static void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #3 from flo.goujeon at orange dot fr 2011-01-26 16:54:18 UTC ---
Oh, so that is the purpose of the 'template' keyword in nested-name-specifier.
That's tricky.
Thank you Jonathan, and sorry about this invalid report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
16:58:28 UTC ---
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00235.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
17:17:04 UTC ---
Draft patch completely untested (not even compiled):
--- a/gcc/fortran/options.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/options.c
@@ -463,9 +463,10 @@ gfc_handle_module_path_options (const char *arg)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Summary: internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Summary: make -j 12 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'"
isn't parallelized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Leaver-Fay 2011-01-26
17:30:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23135
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23135
-save-temps file (.ii) that produces this crash (too big to upload without
bzipping it -- sorry!)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42502
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-01-26 17:50:05
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Jan 26 17:49:56 2011
New Revision: 169296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169296
Log:
2011-01-26 Steve Ellcey
PR target/46997
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 17:51:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just use RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,\}'
> which is parallelized.
Is there a way to paralelize --target_board 'unix{-m32,}'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480
Summary: GCC driver names a resolution file after the last
argument to the linker
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47382
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Leaver-Fay 2011-01-26
18:21:36 UTC ---
I'd love a suggestion on how the code could be changed so that I no longer get
this segfault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47466
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Morin 2011-01-26
18:26:34 UTC ---
A recent 4.6 snapshot shows the same issue
.file"foo.cpp"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globltest_expect(EnumStruct const&)
.typetest_expect(EnumStruct const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-26
18:47:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23136
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23136
Test case (hopefully correct)
Updated test case, hopefully correct. Fails with gfortran due to this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-26 19:11:31
UTC ---
I tried RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix\{-m32,\}'". It doesn't
look like parallelized:
[hjl@gnu-32 gcc]$ ls build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite
g++ gcc gfortran objc
[hjl@gnu-32 gcc]$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45454
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
20:04:55 UTC ---
Fixed up patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01916.html
(one } was missing in the testcase).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-26
20:07:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 26 20:06:57 2011
New Revision: 169299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169299
Log:
PR c/47473
* c-lex.c (interpret_float): If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-26
20:28:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23137
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23137
untested patch
REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 6 bp [72])
(nil)
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.6.0 20110126 (experimental) [trunk revision 169296] (i386-pc-rtems4.11) GCC
error:|
| in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2105 |
| E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
on/44469
* cfgcleanup.c (try_optimize_cfg): Iterate in CFG layout mode too
after removing trivially dead basic blocks.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20110126-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cfgcleanup.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Hello!
Tev telefona numurs izmainiijies?
Man paradijas reals risinajums Tavam problemam, tapec gribeju piezvanit, bet
telefons izslegts.
Skaidrs, lai vai tur kas, man viss super, jo es dabuju fantastiski labu darbu,
kas ir vienkarshaks par vienkarshu un 3825 USD menesi bez problemam man atlec.
V
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
