http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6, 4.5.3
Summary|[4.3/4.4/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46893
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46864
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46416
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47327
Summary: Documentation: Link to GCC Errors and Warnings options
broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46817
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-17
09:14:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 17 09:14:41 2011
New Revision: 168892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168892
Log:
2011-01-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46817
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #26 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
10:08:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > We could do the analysis that fixed PR 45777 here, I just don't know
> > where :-)
> >
> > Could somebody point me to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838
--- Comment #9 from Zdenek Dvorak 2011-01-17
11:04:22 UTC ---
> UGH. Everything involving ivtmp.12 is a waste of time. We really just need
> to
> realize that D1976_16 is D1971_10 + 4 which avoids all the nonsense with
> ivtmp.12 and I *think*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47327
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
11:31:15 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 11:31:10 2011
New Revision: 168894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168894
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
11:31:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 11:31:10 2011
New Revision: 168894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168894
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther
Backp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
11:33:37 UTC ---
Probably WONTFIX at this point?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45422
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-08-29 09:25:52 |2011-01-17 9:25:52
--- Comment #27 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
11:50:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 11:50:47 2011
New Revision: 168896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168896
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6, 4.5.3
Target Milestone|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47322
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47316
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-17
12:02:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually better solution would be function and type attributes, hinting the
> function is never overriden.
C++0x has override control features:
struct B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47313
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47316
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-17
12:20:09 UTC ---
Actually, thanks for filing the bug. Devirtualization and other
optimizations (such as struct-reorg) based on type escape analysis are
a debated issue and it is nice to know users hav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
12:35:26 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:35:21 2011
New Revision: 168897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168897
Log:
PR target/46655
* xcoffout.c (ASM_OUTP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47327
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
12:37:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:36:55 2011
New Revision: 168898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168898
Log:
PR target/46655
* xcoffout.c (ASM_OUTP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-17
12:47:23 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:47:21 2011
New Revision: 168899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168899
Log:
Correct mask operand for AVX mask load/store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #27 from Mikael Morin 2011-01-17
13:01:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Maybe it would be better to set the "inherited" pointer and target
> attributes much earlier, in gfc_variable_attr. With a bit of luck,
> things would then
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-17
13:10:22 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 17 13:10:18 2011
New Revision: 168900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168900
Log:
Correct mask operand for AVX mask load/store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-17
13:20:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> It is, btw, a sign of bad Fortran language design and makes the point
> of the pointer/target attributes moot.
Well, I think it is just different model, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
13:49:47 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this with the testcase from comment #3 on x86_64-linux
with either gold or GNU ld from stock binutils 2.21 nor without using
the linker plugin.
The only call to l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #29 from Michael Matz 2011-01-17 13:52:20
UTC ---
> It is, btw, a sign of bad Fortran language design
I don't see that. The frontend merely needs to emit correctly typed
expressions. And that the type of 'a%b%ptr%d' depends on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-apple-darwin9
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47318
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-17
13:54:46 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 17 13:54:43 2011
New Revision: 168904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168904
Log:
Correct mask operand for AVX mask load/store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47328
Summary: preprocessor handles backslash at the end of a line
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47306
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47328
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45696
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzi...@trash-mail.com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47313
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47313
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
14:48:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 14:48:35 2011
New Revision: 168907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168907
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
14:49:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 22995
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22995
gcc46-pr47290.patch
Ugh, cddce pass for empty loop:
:
:
goto ;
creates a preheader:
:
:
:
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 15:12:38 UTC ---
> I suppose you are using GNU ld, right?
Yes (gold has not been ported).
> On trunk x86_64 with stock binutils 2.21 I get
>
> > cat 20010124-1.res
> 3
> 20010124-1.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
15:21:36 UTC ---
Small correction, the empty infinite loop is not split because of preheader
creation, but because of force_single_succ_latches - the condition there causes
edge split even when latch h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-01-17
15:42:26 UTC ---
Resolution file is:
3
abs-1.o 3
70 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR main_test
84 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR abs
88 262910e5 PREEMPTED_IR abs_called
abs-1-lib.o 3
70 b13b015b PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47329
Summary: cc1plus segfaults when using variadic function
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
Summary: libdecnumber/Makefile.in overrides CFLAGS set by sub
make invocation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson 2011-01-17
16:03:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> But it never checks the buffer end. It looks bogus to me.
Read the comment at the beginning of the section. This is an aligned
read before END, and t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:03:37 UTC
---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
>
> --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-01-17
> 15:42:26 UTC ---
> Resolution file is:
>
> 3
> abs-1.o 3
> 70 262910e5 PREE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:05:56 UTC
---
> Note that the assert probably should do &&, not ||. Or it doesn't
> make sense at all. Asserting that the prevailing_node is analyzed
> should be enough.
No, the assert basically tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17 16:08:05 UTC
---
> thus, memcpy is also missing but at least main_test is correctly
> used from 20010124-1.o.
memcpy is missing due to hack eliminating all builtins from being output. We
discussed
this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-17
16:10:54 UTC ---
Is hpux an ELF target? GNU LD plugin implementation contains some hackery to
chose proper PREEMPTED/RESOLVED/etc values.
Perhaps it is broken on non-elfs.
In any case I will prepare pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-17 16:13:37
UTC ---
You are not supposed to override CFLAGS in sub-makes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1133
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
16:14:21 UTC ---
The GNU linker made
extern int abs_called;
prevailing (it's a common, probably works with -fno-common?) instead of
int abs_called = 0;
thus I think this is a bug in the GNU lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-17
16:15:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The GNU linker made
>
> extern int abs_called;
>
> prevailing (it's a common, probably works with -fno-common?) instead of
>
> int abs_called = 0;
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #2 from Ryan S. Arnold 2011-01-17 16:16:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You are not supposed to override CFLAGS in sub-makes.
What's the recommended procedure for making sure fPIC/fpic is used properly,
once again relying on th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-01-17 16:25:25
UTC ---
Those who ignore libtool are forced to reimplement it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Summary: g++ compiler should check for empty while or for
bodies
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #16 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
17:48:41 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 17:48:36 2011
New Revision: 168917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168917
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-22 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
17:49:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 17:49:25 2011
New Revision: 168918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168918
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-22 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47331
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-17
17:49:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 22997
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22997
gcc46-pr47331.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Summary: [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris
2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47287
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47332
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
Summary: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without
visibility
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47330
Ryan S. Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #16 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-17 18:05:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > But it never checks the buffer end. It looks bogus to me.
>
> Read the comment at the beginning of the section. This is an a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-17
18:12:53 UTC ---
THe ICE happens because refs_may_alias_p_1 gets an ao_ref initialized
from a MEM_REF of an ADDR_EXPR of a component_ref.
get_ref_base_and_extent then removes the MEM_REF but the base i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 18:32:22 UTC ---
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> It seems that we get wrong already when streaming abs-1-lib.o file. Would be
> possible to attach cgraph dump from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
--- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-01-17 18:39:14 UTC ---
Last graph.
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo