http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe 2011-01-11 08:36:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > should this be closed as fixed - and, if not, what is the remaining issue?
>
> The remaining issue is that the just built comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 09:12:05
UTC ---
> /Users/howarth/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
> -B/Users/howarth/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/
> -B/Users/howarth/dist/x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0/bin/
> -B/Users/howarth/dist/x86_64-apple-d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47257
Summary: Redundant redeclaration warning with -combine
-Wredundant-decls flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
10:09:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 10:09:15 2011
New Revision: 168652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168652
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-11
11:30:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 11 11:30:07 2011
New Revision: 168655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168655
Log:
PR c++/46658
* init.c (build_new_1): Handl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-11
11:30:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 11 11:29:58 2011
New Revision: 168654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168654
Log:
PR c++/45520
* tree.c (maybe_dummy_object):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47221
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|[4.6.0 regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47217
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 11:48:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47214
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47210
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47214
--- Comment #2 from Paul Koning 2011-01-11
12:00:56 UTC ---
Not if you look at that call in isolation, true. But right before it in the
test program is a check that does exactly this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-11 12:06:38
UTC ---
Patch already posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00575.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
Summary|[4.5 4.6 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
--- Comment #2 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-01-11 12:35:37 UTC ---
I'm sorry,
I cannot make a testcase for this because I don't know the exact cause of the
problem. Webkit is huge, and highly optimised and above my understanding...
I have provide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47257
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
12:38:09 UTC ---
There is a duplicate somewhere for this bug. Inlining happens before any
CSE is done which is what you see. If you remove the side-effect the
multiplications will be CSEd instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47252
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
12:44:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Worked with: r168582 (2011-01-07)
> > Fails with: r168598 (2011-01-08)
> >
> > My guess is that Honza's r168593 exposes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46871
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47252
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
12:50:39 UTC ---
I think this has been fixed anyway, using Boost 1.42 it works with 4.5.2 and
4.6.0 - so you should probably report it to Ubuntu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47221
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 13:03:00 UTC
---
> we don't check for an error of inflateInit2 in which case state is
> not initialized.
Probably we should fix that, but still I don't think we should leak our well
engineered
MEM_REF gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coolypf at qq dot com
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 13:06:18 UTC
---
> > If you want to use BFD linker for LTO plugin, you need the Linux binutils
> > 2.21.51.0.5. LTO plugin support in binutils-2.21 is incomplete.
>
> I hope it will be fixed on the 2.21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
13:27:54 UTC ---
Even when we do not default to -flinker-plugin w/o LTO this remains a problem.
We should chase out cases where we build plugin but it is useless.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
13:29:58 UTC ---
I believed that we are supposed to update the statement first and only then try
to inline it. Otherwise we would get into problem with inliner not skipping the
args.
Anyway lookup base
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
Summary: Extra instruction generated in 4.5.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #1 from Bingfeng Mei 2011-01-11 13:38:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 22944
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22944
Preprocessed test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
13:48:30 UTC ---
The regression testresults a lto-bootstrap of the proposed patch in Comment 10
on x86_64-apple-darwin10...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00899.html
The patch will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44217
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
14:03:29 UTC ---
testing the following patch.
Index: gcc.c
===
--- gcc.c (revision 168655)
+++ gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -621,11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-11
14:06:26 UTC ---
Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
> The patch will also be problematic for powerpc-apple-darwin9 and darwin8 since
> it relies on dwarf2 and those OS releases still use stabs.
It should not be problem. For stabs we don't do var tracking.
The original test tested if target debug info supports var tracking and dwarf2
is the
only on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 14:06:58
UTC ---
> The patch will also be problematic for powerpc-apple-darwin9 and darwin8 since
> it relies on dwarf2 and those OS releases still use stabs.
It should not be problem. For stabs we don
> Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
No, it is older than the problem and it is about plugins, not lto-plugin.
Perhaps plugins Make also needs to play the games with --enable-shared I added
into lto-plugin configury.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 14:08:41 UTC
---
> Is pr39968 related (a duplicate) of this pr?
No, it is older than the problem and it is about plugins, not lto-plugin.
Perhaps plugins Make also needs to play the games with --enable-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:10:58
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:10:54 2011
New Revision: 168659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168659
Log:
* PR tree-optimization/47086
* tree-ssa-loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:16:18
UTC ---
*** Bug 47087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-11
14:21:26 UTC ---
> > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> > ...
> > continue;
>
> ... this produces loads of regressions.
Confirmed;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-11 14:21:49
UTC ---
Thank you for fixing this.
It is not planned for backport to 4.5? Target Milestone set to 4.5.3 will cause
this bug to be shown as fixed in 4.5.3, which is not true.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
14:23:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:23:20 2011
New Revision: 168661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168661
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-11 14:42:40
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/11 07:22, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
>
> --- Comment #6 from Zdenek So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 14:43:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(revision 16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-11 14:51:17
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:51:07 2011
New Revision: 168662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168662
Log:
2011-01-11 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
15:11:49 UTC ---
I assume you really meant...
if (flag_var_tracking
&& (generating_for_darwin_version >= 9)
&& (flag_gtoggle ? (debug_info_level >= DINFO_LEVEL_NORMAL)
: (debug_inf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
15:23:34 UTC ---
Both the patch in comment 16 and 17 produce the same errors in a standard
bootstrap...
../../gcc/libdecnumber/decContext.c:1:0: error: variable tracking requested,
but useless unless
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-11 15:28:56 UTC ---
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I don't think we should add hacks like that. Either the type signatures
> are compatible for the middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45235
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
15:41:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 15:41:17 2011
New Revision: 168663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168663
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45235
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47242
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-01-11
15:45:34 UTC ---
I think the real problem here is that when reloading autoincs, we somehow end
up with
(gdb) p spill_reg_store[3]
$42 = (rtx) 0xf7a1118c
(gdb) pr
(insn 3163 3161 3164 99 rectmm.c:1041
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #2 from Bingfeng Mei 2011-01-11 16:16:28
UTC ---
After tried patches one-by-one, I believe the misoptimization is down to the
following patch.
Index: tree-ssa-copyrename.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-11
16:27:28 UTC ---
Are we still waiting for feedback? PS: IMHO, if just is ok instead of
, it would be much nicer. Besides that nit, it would be nice to
have the tweak in 4.6.0, if we can make it...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-11
16:32:00 UTC ---
Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
below works with both a standard and lto-bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
16:34:31 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.0 can't be built on NetBSD (PR 47147) so unless that gets fixed there's
no way to test the changes, and so I thought no urgency to fix this one
I'm happy to commit the chang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
16:34:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> After tried patches one-by-one, I believe the misoptimization is down to the
> following patch.
Which is a correctness patch. You can try dumbing it dow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47258
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
16:35:23 UTC ---
But we'll create bogus debug info for the typedef type decls then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot|
|com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-11
16:41:56 UTC ---
If you have no objections I'll resolve PR 43863 for 4.6.0 (by putting
recurisve_init_error in a separate file) but I think this "quiet mode" needs a
bit more thought and time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11
16:46:40 UTC ---
path posted. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00654.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-11
16:48:38 UTC ---
Of course no objections, I just couldn't figure out what we were up to.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44951
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
Because the original code bahviour is wrong. It assumes that debug_hooks is
initialized
while it is not at the point.
Honza
> below works with both a standard and lto-bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
>
> Index: gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-11 16:56:35
UTC ---
> Why not retain the original code behavior unless generating lto? The patch
Because the original code bahviour is wrong. It assumes that debug_hooks is
initialized
while it is not at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-11
17:01:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 11 17:01:37 2011
New Revision: 168665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168665
Log:
2011-01-11 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-01-11
17:02:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 22945
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22945
Test patch
Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
recently posted.
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
