[Bug fortran/47240] New: segfault with procedure pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 Summary: segfault with procedure pointer component Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug fortran/47224] [F03] ICE with procedure pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47224 --- Comment #7 from Martien Hulsen 2011-01-10 08:51:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I now have a segfault when running the code. Will send a bug report after I > > manage to reduce the code. > > A segfault is

[Bug fortran/47240] segfault with procedure pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/47240] [F03] segfault with procedure pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|U

[Bug tree-optimization/47056] [4.6 Regression] 10 Ada ACATS tests fail to link with undefined reference on ia64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056 --- Comment #10 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-10 09:37:23 UTC --- Thanks Eric :) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00728.html LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 8 23:02:58 UTC 2011 (revision 168603) === acats tests === FAIL:cb1010c

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6.0 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i586-pc-mingw32 Sta

[Bug lto/47241] New: lto not work on mingw32, reporting 'ld.exe: could not unlink output file'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241 Summary: lto not work on mingw32, reporting 'ld.exe: could not unlink output file' Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: [Bug lto/47225] [4.6.0 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

> I don't think it is. I am building a cross-compiler (with build = host = > x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0, target = i586-pc-mingw32) from unpatched GCC > revision 168626, and it's failing with the same symptoms. When configuring > libgcc, I get: > > > checking for suffix of object files... configure

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6.0 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 11:51:43 UTC --- > I don't think it is. I am building a cross-compiler (with build = host = > x86_64-apple-darwin10.6.0, target = i586-pc-mingw32) from unpatched GCC > revision 168626, and it's failing

[Bug testsuite/46230] several vectorization tests FAIL or XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10 12:12:07 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Jan 10 12:11:59 2011 New Revision: 168627 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168627 Log: PR testsuite/46230 * gcc.dg/vect/pr3380

[Bug testsuite/46230] several vectorization tests FAIL or XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10 12:41:43 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Jan 10 12:41:40 2011 New Revision: 168628 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168628 Log: PR testsuite/46230 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-p

[Bug c++/47242] New: [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have error_mark in build_lambda_object, at cp/semantics.c:7604 on invalid lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47242 Summary: [C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected field_decl, have error_mark in build_lambda_object, at cp/semantics.c:7604 on invalid lambda function Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug lto/47222] [4.6 Regression] Revision 168593 failed many tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/46230] several vectorization tests FAIL or XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10 12:51:03 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Jan 10 12:51:00 2011 New Revision: 168629 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168629 Log: PR testsuite/46230 * gcc.dg/vect/vect-v

[Bug testsuite/46230] several vectorization tests FAIL or XPASS on SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/43891] -fwropr misses mismatch of function return types causing an ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43891 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/44463] whopr does not work with weak functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-01-10 12:57:25 UTC --- On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463 > > --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-09 > 02:11:27 UTC

[Bug lto/47222] [4.6 Regression] Revision 168593 failed many tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 13:15:54 UTC --- > So this bug is in fact invalid (or a dup of PR47237), right? Well, it seemed correct to create separate PR for the wrong code bug that is independent of plugin. This PR tracks also th

[Bug lto/44463] whopr does not work with weak functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 13:20:36 UTC --- > Yep. It's a mess. > > I'd really really like to have aliases be handled in a unified > IPA symbol table entry facility before adding even more hacks. > Thus we'd have proper resolut

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #27 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 13:24:30 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 10 13:24:27 2011 New Revision: 168631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168631 Log: Check e->call_stmt before calling gimple_ca

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 13:44:00 UTC --- H.J., since you run regular testing, do you think you could switch one of tester into lto-bootstrap (or ideally lto-bootstrap with FDO) so we keep those in good condition? Thanks! Honza

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 13:48:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > H.J., since you run regular testing, do you think you could switch one of > tester into lto-bootstrap (or ideally lto-bootstrap with FDO) so we keep those > in g

Re: [Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

> I have been testing lto-bootstrap: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00750.html > > I will try to start lto-bootstrap with FDO. Great, thanks! The FDO bootstrap always suffered from lack of testing, so this should help. Honza

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 13:51:02 UTC --- > I have been testing lto-bootstrap: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00750.html > > I will try to start lto-bootstrap with FDO. Great, thanks! The FDO bootstrap a

[Bug tree-optimization/47141] [4.6 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-10 13:51:05 UTC --- Created attachment 22938 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22938 FIx for PR 47141

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 13:59:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > > I have been testing lto-bootstrap: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00750.html > > > > I will try to start lto-bootstrap with FDO. >

[Bug lto/47241] lto not work on mingw32, reporting 'ld.exe: could not unlink output file'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241 --- Comment #1 from coolypf 2011-01-10 13:59:45 UTC --- same problem on mingw-w64, with error message: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=D:\MinGW\bin\gcc64.exe COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=d:/mingw/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/4.6.0/lto-wrapper.

[Bug tree-optimization/47234] ipa-split is executed before profile feedback is read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47234 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 14:33:08 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Jan 10 14:33:04 2011 New Revision: 168632 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168632 Log: PR tree-optimization/47234 * tree-pass.h

[Bug tree-optimization/47234] ipa-split is executed before profile feedback is read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47234 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44846] Violation of one-definition rule

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44846 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|45375 | --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-1

[Bug lto/44951] debug info ICE in whopr build due to missing -g at compile time.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44951 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|45375 | --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-1

[Bug tree-optimization/44897] -fwhopr + ipa-sra misoptimize sqlite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/41201] #pragma GCC target ("sse2") doesn't alter __SSE2__ in C++ (as it does in C)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|davek at gcc dot gnu.o

[Bug bootstrap/46037] --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto --enable-languages=c,lto --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037 --- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-01-10 15:28:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > the optimize attribute isn't used in the preprocessed file but only the > target attribute which is supported. Thus, "worksforme". Target attributes must be im

Re: [Bug bootstrap/46037] --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto --enable-languages=c,lto --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails on darwin

> Target attributes must be implying optimisation attributes. Bug depends also > on --with-{arch,tune,fpmath} settings. I'll try and reproduce it on > x86_64-linux, it should be possible if I choose the right settings - will > reply > again later. Well, we probably should just go ahead and impl

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug bootstrap/46037] --enable-stage1-languages=c,lto --enable-languages=c,lto --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 15:46:25 UTC --- > Target attributes must be implying optimisation attributes. Bug depends also > on --with-{arch,tune,fpmath} settings. I'll try and reproduce it on > x86_64-linux, it should be possib

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-10 15:48:51 UTC --- The original problem was fixed for GCC 4.6 with 2010-09-24 Jan Hubicka * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_entry_def): Add guessed field. (lto_symtab_resolve_symbols):

[Bug bootstrap/47243] New: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/47086] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/47243] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 16:00:45 UTC --- Since you use LTO, you should try the Linux binutils 2.21.51.0.5.

[Bug libffi/29152] 64-bit darwin ppc port needed for libffi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29152 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/47244] New: [4.6 Regression] plugin linker is used unconditionally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244 Summary: [4.6 Regression] plugin linker is used unconditionally Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assign

[Bug driver/47244] [4.6 Regression] plugin linker is used unconditionally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/47215] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47246] New: [4.6 Regression] Invalid immediate offset for Thumb VFP store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Invalid immediate offset for Thumb VFP store Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug testsuite/29057] gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c fails to compile on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29057 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47246] [4.6 Regression] Invalid immediate offset for Thumb VFP store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246 --- Comment #1 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-10 16:17:37 UTC --- Created attachment 22940 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22940 Demonstrates the problem instruction, on line 37

[Bug bootstrap/47215] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-10 16:23:23 UTC --- Issue here is that s390 uses for its va_list_node_type a record containing long_integer_type_node type, which doesn't get initialized by java's decl.c

[Bug tree-optimization/44897] -flto + ipa-sra misoptimize sqlite (non-plugin only)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 16:39:08 UTC --- The libmoznome build issue is now Mozilla PR https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624385

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #26 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-10 16:39:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > Sigh, in this case I forgot that we now also stall when we have issued exactly > issue_rate instructions, so in this case we also need to recheck the DFA, n

[Bug lto/47247] New: Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 Summary: Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug tree-optimization/47141] [4.6 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-10 16:48:46 UTC --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 10 16:48:42 2011 New Revision: 168634 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168634 Log: * PR tree-optimization/47141 * ipa-split.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/47141] [4.6 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/47243] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guen

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 17:02:02 UTC --- Do we have a small testcase to experiment with?

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 17:04:30 UTC --- Can we mark the symbol COMDAT when we generate the output?

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 17:10:52 UTC --- > Can we mark the symbol COMDAT when we generate the output? What symbol and what output? Honza

[Bug bootstrap/47243] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 17:13:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Can we mark the symbol COMDAT when we generate the output? > What symbol and what output? > > Honza I don't think hjl/lto-mixed branch has the problem --- Cur

[Bug bootstrap/47248] New: libffi build failure with ld.gold (works with trunk 20110106, fails with 20110110)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47248 Summary: libffi build failure with ld.gold (works with trunk 20110106, fails with 20110110) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/47249] New: ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695

: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: rmansfi...@qnx.com $ ./xgcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c++ --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20110110 (experimental) [trunk revision 168633

[Bug bootstrap/47248] libffi build failure with ld.gold (works with trunk 20110106, fails with 20110110)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47248 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2011-01-10 17:22:26 UTC --- ld.gold from binutils 2.21 was used. object files at https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/701110/+attachment/1790281/+files/tst.tar.xz

[Bug gcov-profile/38292] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Klose 2011-01-10 17:24:03 UTC --- I ran into bug #47248 trying to build a recent snapshot.

[Bug bootstrap/47243] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails: Segfault of genmddeps / COLLECT bug?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 17:49:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Worked with: r168582 (2011-01-07) > Fails with: r168598 (2011-01-08) > > My guess is that Honza's r168593 exposes the issue. I now try to build without > --enabl

[Bug driver/47249] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 17:54:51 UTC --- The plugin specification says that once the COMDAT is marked PREVAILING, it has to be output. "Any symbol marked PREVAILING_DEF must be defined in one object file added to the link aft

[Bug driver/47249] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-10 18:00:22 UTC --- On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: >Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 This is not a 4.6 regression, though it may be a regre

[Bug tree-optimization/46021] 3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-10 18:19:48 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jan 10 18:19:45 2011 New Revision: 168635 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168635 Log: PR tree-optimization/46021 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/200

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 18:26:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > The plugin specification says that once the COMDAT is marked PREVAILING, it > has > to be output. > "Any symbol marked PREVAILING_DEF must be defined in one obj

[Bug rtl-optimization/37273] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] IRA does not re-materializes addresses (loads from the TOC)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/46492] Several C++ LTO testcases fail to link on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46492 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjg at gnu dot org --- Comment #21 from

[Bug java/42524] gcc-4.4.2 build fails on gcj with unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42524 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-07-26 23:31:49 |2011-01-10 CC|

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug c++/47250] New: ICE: in add_substitution, at cp/mangle.c:393 with -fabi-version=5 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47250 Summary: ICE: in add_substitution, at cp/mangle.c:393 with -fabi-version=5 -g Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant 2011-01-10 19:07:54 UTC --- I've added a new disposition code LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP and a new version of the GET_SYMBOLS interface to the API specification on the wiki: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/whopr/driv

[Bug target/33637] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] "checking for nm: test: too many arguments" causes "Undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33637 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ltg at zes dot |

[Bug bootstrap/38546] configure: too many arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38546 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug pch/45979] precompiled headers breakage on 2.6.36-rc Linux/ARM kernels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-01-10 19:30:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Please can you confirm that this is now fixed in trunk, Mikael. No, it has not been fixed on trunk. > And has it been backported? Not in the official

[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258 --- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 19:41:42 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Jan 10 19:41:39 2011 New Revision: 168639 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168639 Log: 2010-08-17 Jack Howarth PR target/4

[Bug lto/47222] [4.6 Regression] Revision 168593 failed many tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222 --- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 19:58:59 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 10 19:58:57 2011 New Revision: 168640 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168640 Log: Add __attribute__((externally_visible)). 2

[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14 fr

[Bug libobjc/25359] some objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1 failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25359 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug objc/44488] objc test inconsistencies w/ / w/out --enable-build-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-01-10 20:25:19 UTC --- should this be closed as fixed - and, if not, what is the remaining issue?

[Bug target/26427] with -fsection-anchors with zero sized structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26427 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47240] [F03] segfault with procedure pointer component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 20:27:29 UTC --- Reduced test case: type t procedure (fun), pointer, nopass :: p end type type(t) :: x x%p => fun print *, evaluate (x%p) contains real function fun () fun

[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-10 20:27:22 UTC --- Iain, I was referring to the conceptual problems of creating a version-compare-remove-outfile spec function. For any given OS release there is a different set of symlinks for libSys

[Bug middle-end/46823] [4.6 Regression] ICE: edge points to wrong declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-10 20:34:14 UTC --- The problem seems to be a different one. During IPA decision making we decide to clone a function and the call graph node of the original one is then removed as unreachable an unnece

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-10 20:56:23 UTC --- > What undesirable things may happen if we mark a COMDAT symbol > PREVAILING_DEF? Is that we won't know which one will be used > if both LTO and non-LTO objects define the same COMAT sy

[Bug lto/47247] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle COMDATs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-10 21:01:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > > What undesirable things may happen if we mark a COMDAT symbol > > PREVAILING_DEF? Is that we won't know which one will be used > > if both LTO and non-LTO obje

[Bug target/47251] New: Powerpc doesn't like -m32 -msoft-float -mcpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47251 Summary: Powerpc doesn't like -m32 -msoft-float -mcpu=power7 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedT

[Bug target/47251] Powerpc doesn't like -m32 -msoft-float -mcpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47251 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/47251] Powerpc doesn't like -m32 -msoft-float -mcpu=power7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47251 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

  1   2   >