http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #37 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 08:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> (In reply to comment #35)
> > Yes, I think I know what's going on. One way to fix it is the following:
>
> I managed to get an ICE with your vers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-28
08:48:11 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
procedure C390002 is
type Object is tagged null record;
begin
null;
end C390002;
gue...@babe:~/tmp$ gnatmake -f -O1 c390002.adb
gcc -c -O1 c390002.adb
gnat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Summary: tree check fail in create_access_replacement
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #38 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-28
12:22:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22856
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22856
testcase, ICE with patch in comment #35
(In reply to comment #37)
> > I managed to get an ICE with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 12:51:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here's a patch:
The patch in comment #4 had a few regressions (e.g. on alloc_comp_basics_1.f90
etc), but the following version regtests cleanly:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #39 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 13:18:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> > > I managed to get an ICE with your version (sym == NULL)
> >
> > No, that's not possible. My version (i.e. comment #35) is inserted at a
> > s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #6 from Salvatore Filippone
2010-12-28 13:40:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Here's a patch:
>
> The patch in comment #4 had a few regressions (e.g. on alloc_comp_basics_1.f90
> etc), but the follow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46597
--- Comment #1 from Jay 2010-12-28 13:50:06 UTC
---
I put #define ENABLE_CHECKING_GCC_VERSION ((GCC_VERSION > 3003) ||
(!defined(__cplusplus) && (GCC_VERSION > 2007)))
in include/ansidecl.h after #define GCC_VERSION and I && this with the #if
FO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-28
14:36:58 UTC ---
This seems to be a fallout from the fix to PR 46351 and PR 46377
(revision 166535, patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00933.html).
The problem is that struct pack9_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47010
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-28
14:50:51 UTC ---
I think it sets up a frame to have possible spills of xmm registers land in
aligned stack slots.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
--- Comment #27 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|gcc.dg/pr46685.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47068
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Summary: Missed deprecation warnings for @property when using
getter/setter directly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47029
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47033
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47025
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Summary: Protocol referenced in @interface declarations should
be defined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47025
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47019
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47062
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47077
Summary: ICE on invalid code (method implementation outside of
implementation context)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #40 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-28
17:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> Ok, I get it. Sorry about the misconception. Feel free to commit the patch in
> comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I take care of it?
Please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Summary: ICE on invalid type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/nrv-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47080
Summary: explicit conversion function return conversions not
restricted to qualifications
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45654
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45086
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
Bl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-28
18:27:08 UTC ---
*** Bug 46478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45086
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #41 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 18:53:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> > Feel free to commit the patch in
> > comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I take care of it?
>
> Please, you did the hard work - it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47080
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub
2010-12-28 19:10:25 UTC ---
It should be noted that this can yield to ambiguities in combination with other
conversion functions. Consider
enum E { };
struct A {
explicit operator int();
operator E();
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
Summary: Macro usage too clever for localization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-28
19:21:25 UTC ---
I don't know if generator files should be have translated error messages.
Unlike other programs, the gen* programs are only used internally inside gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #2 from Göran Uddeborg 2010-12-28
19:23:57 UTC ---
Oh, I see. You mean this message is never seen by an end user? In that case,
maybe they could be excluded from the set of files scanned for messages to
translate? Or would that be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-28 19:44:02 UTC ---
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I don't know if generator files should be have translated error messages.
> Unlike other programs, the gen* p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Summary: [OOP] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47083
Summary: alpha-dec-osf5.1 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-28
20:20:32 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Dec 28 20:20:29 2010
New Revision: 168299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168299
Log:
PR debug/46931
* tree-vect-loop-manip.c (slpeel_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47084
Summary: am33_2.0-linux fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47085
Summary: [OOP] Problem in allocate( SOURCE=) for polymorphic
component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but
has an EH edge with -O -fexceptions
-fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: statement marked for throw,
but doesn't with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47088
Summary: arm-freebsd6 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #42 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 21:21:56 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 28 21:21:53 2010
New Revision: 168302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168302
Log:
2010-12-28 Janus Weil
Daniel F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #15 from Daniel Franke 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #24 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-28
21:49:39 UTC ---
*** Bug 40824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40824
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Summary: ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at
tree-cfg.c:5003 with -O -fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Franke 2010-12-28
22:30:10 UTC ---
Other potential dupes: PR40737, PR45128.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40899
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47090
Summary: Incorrect parsing by ssanf/fscanf with scanset.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Franke 2010
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47090
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-28
22:58:42 UTC ---
GCC does not include sscanf. And can you quote where in the standard it says
what the output supposed to be?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-28
23:04:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22863
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22863
Patch that fixes the problem
Here's the patch that I'm testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-29
00:07:02 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01912.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Summary: arm-netbsd fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-netbsd, arm-pe |arm-netbsd, arm-pe,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47092
Summary: [4.6 Regression]
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_4.f90 is VERY
slow with -fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
Summary: [meta-bug]: broken configurations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47094
Summary: i386-freebsd6.0_aout fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47095
Summary: defunct configuration v850e1-*-*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-29 01:16:59
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Dec 29 01:16:55 2010
New Revision: 168307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168307
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2010-12-28 Nicola Pero
PR objc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47096
Summary: i686-interix3 fails building dbxout.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47096
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-29 01:47:28 UTC ---
The definition of DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER comes from config/i386/i386-interix.h .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47097
Summary: i686-lynxos fails building dbxout.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47098
Summary: i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47068
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-29
02:17:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 29 02:17:47 2010
New Revision: 168309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168309
Log:
PR c++/47068
* semantics.c (finish_id_expre
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
