http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47029
Summary: fixincludes: the fix for c99 inlines in the glibc
header files fixes function declarations as well as
function definitions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45852
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
08:35:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 21 08:35:16 2010
New Revision: 168105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168105
Log:
PR middle-end/45852
* expr.c (store_expr):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #17 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-21 10:20:23 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Tue Dec 21 10:20:19 2010
New Revision: 168107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168107
Log:
PR other/46677
gcc:
* doc/tm.te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-21
10:30:36 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Dec 21 10:30:33 2010
New Revision: 168108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168108
Log:
PR middle-end/47000
* tree-inline.c (esti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-21
10:39:42 UTC ---
Hi,
I read the comment only after comiting the patch. We generally believe
conversions to be free even if this is not always the case. FP->int conversions
tends to be expensive, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres
2010-12-21 10:46:06 UTC ---
For the record I have also tested the patch in comment #14 on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 168070. Without the patch I get
[karma] lin/test% gfc -Ofast -funroll-loops -ft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030
Summary: !GCC$ Attributes do not work for COMMON variables in
procedures and BLOCK DATA
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 10:56:33
UTC ---
Yes, I'll visit Fosdem - let's meet up there.
> In the code you linked, is that objc_mutex_t a spinlock? If not,
> this might be performance problem.
You are right, it's a normal lock.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-21
11:05:52 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 21 11:05:49 2010
New Revision: 168109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168109
Log:
2010-12-21 Martin Jambor
Backport from ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #8 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2010-12-21 11:26:37 UTC ---
Hm, a mutex can be a real problem there, I guess. Accessors are used all the
time, having a kernel lock each time will be a giant slowdown, especially as
most of the time,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 11:38:56
UTC ---
Sure, go ahead and create a bug for it. We can make the change for 4.6 if we
make it safe. By the way, changing configure.ac is not a problem, we can do
that, particularly if it makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
Summary: libobjc uses mutexes for properties
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #22 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-21
12:10:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22834
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22834
Another patch
This patch should fix the last attachment from this bug and also the tests from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-21
12:13:08 UTC ---
The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352#c22 works for
this test, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Andrey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
12:30:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 22835
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22835
gcc46-pr45701.patch
Remembering pointers to tail call insns is both wasteful (allocates stuff that
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46750
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
Andrew John Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu_andrew at member dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46972
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 13:44:09
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 13:44:04 2010
New Revision: 168115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168115
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-21
14:35:17 UTC ---
And it fails for me even when I switch both IPA-SRA and IPA-CP off.
So at the moment I have reasons to believe the bug is not in any of my
areas of knowledge or interest. And since t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #16 from Onur Küçük 2010-12-21 14:43:41
UTC ---
I can also reproduce the problem. It was not there with 4.5.1, came with 4.5.2.
When I force -O1 profiledbootstrap works fine, but ICE occurs with -O2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
14:45:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 22836
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22836
gcc46-pr46880.patch
Untested fix. In both of these insns, for the shufpd $2 alternative %2 operand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47008
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
14:51:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 21 14:51:42 2010
New Revision: 168117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168117
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47008
* postreload.c (r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2010-12-21
14:55:43 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Dec 21 14:55:41 2010
New Revision: 168118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168118
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/46755
* ira.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45310
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2010-12-21
15:02:05 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Dec 21 15:02:02 2010
New Revision: 168120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168120
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/45310
* tree-ssa-phip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45310
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2010-12-21
15:08:42 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Dec 21 15:08:40 2010
New Revision: 168121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168121
Log:
Forgotten ChangeLog entries.
gcc/
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46984
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-21
15:11:50 UTC ---
Fix submitted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01618.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45310
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.6.0 |
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-21
15:32:26 UTC ---
Works also with GCC 4.6.0 20101129 (experimental) [trunk revision 167231] on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16110
--- Comment #6 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 15:34:22
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 15:34:19 2010
New Revision: 168122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168122
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16110
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47001
--- Comment #2 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-21 15:42:15 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Dec 21 15:42:11 2010
New Revision: 168123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168123
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47001
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
Summary: libgfortran references complex long double functions
missing on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #17 from Onur Küçük 2010-12-21 17:10:48
UTC ---
I see this with i686 btw, x86-64 seems ok
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-21
17:19:57 UTC ---
my patch doesn't help in these cases (which clang does warn about):
A() : a(this->a) { }
A() : a((int)a) { }
A() : a(a+1) { }
For that we need proper tracking of uninitialized variab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-21
18:00:18 UTC ---
Related: PR 46825
All (that PR, this PR and the thread) are with www.Equation.com builds - and
according the following thread they only occur with the 32bit version:
http://groups.goo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
18:24:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 22837
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22837
gcc46-pr44341.patch
So is this what we want to do?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2010-12-21 18:37:21 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 05:07:53PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This is an interaction / assumption problem between the target (AIX) and
> libgfortran. libgfortran previously
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47033
Summary: loop distribution has problems on sane testcases
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2010-12-21
20:55:26 UTC ---
No, the test case I had in testsuite had the dg-warning markers of the original
test case.
I will fix my commit. This isn't my day today, I also managed to forget
committing ChangeL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47034
Summary: TRANSFER of C_PTR: Components of structure constructor
are PRIVATE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18575
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31821
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-21
22:37:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 21 22:37:23 2010
New Revision: 168135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168135
Log:
PR target/46880
* config/i386/sse.md (sse2_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47021
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-21 22:46:19
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 21 22:46:05 2010
New Revision: 168138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168138
Log:
Fix PR47021: ADDR_EXPRs don't contain SCoP parameter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47021
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-21 22:48:13
UTC ---
Fixed in the graphite branch. I will close the PR when the patch will be
committed to trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18764
--- Comment #8 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 22:49:44
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 22:49:37 2010
New Revision: 168139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168139
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18764
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47035
Summary: libgcc/config/t-softfp not used on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47035
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-21
23:17:20 UTC ---
We do have '$(srcdir)/config/soft-fp/t-softfp' appended to tmake_file in the
generated gcc/Makefile on darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_cond_jump, at
sel-sched.c:4901 with -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling -fno-dce
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Summary: 465.tonto Segmentation Fault in memset
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
--- Comment #1 from Changpeng Fang 2010-12-22
00:55:35 UTC ---
Initially I thought it is a glibc bug, but seems it is not:
(1) A workaround flag is -fno-caller-saves
(2) The compile binary (NOTE: with -static) runs correctly on other systems
Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-22
03:49:06 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 22 03:49:00 2010
New Revision: 168160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168160
Log:
PR debug/46724
* function.c (assign_parms_augme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39655
Rob changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Summary: gcc.dg/pr46685.c FAILs on Solaris 10/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #23 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-12-22
07:46:57 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Dec 22 07:46:53 2010
New Revision: 168164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168164
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45352
PR rtl-optimi
78 matches
Mail list logo