http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #39 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-07
09:46:51 UTC ---
The patch looks reasonable to me. -dsym and -idsym need addition to common.opt
as driver option I think and eventually need documentation if they are supposed
to be used by the us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46595
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46720
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46726
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-07
10:43:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 7 10:43:38 2010
New Revision: 167531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167531
Log:
2010-12-07 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46726
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46737
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-07 10:46:28 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Tue Dec 7 10:46:24 2010
New Revision: 167532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167532
Log:
2010-12-07 Joern Rennecke
Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
--- Comment #3 from yikey326 at hotmail dot com 2010-12-07 10:48:51 UTC ---
Yes, the old problem might due to mpfr since in my computer I had several
versions of gmp and mpfr was not installed properly.
Now I reinstalled gmp and mpfr. But this ti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
--- Comment #4 from yikey326 at hotmail dot com 2010-12-07 10:51:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 22666
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22666
The new config file for a libcpp compile problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46816
--- Comment #5 from yikey326 at hotmail dot com 2010-12-07 10:59:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 22667
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22667
/usr/src/gccobjects/libcpp/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-07
11:06:11 UTC ---
Francois, do you have an opinion about this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-07
11:21:45 UTC ---
It should work for x86_64, not necessarily i?86.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-07
11:22:40 UTC ---
Would be nice to have separate bugs for the separate issues ... otherwise
categorizing this is difficult.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46832
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46799
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
11:27:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 11:27:37 2010
New Revision: 167533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167533
Log:
PR debug/46799
* tree-parloops.c (separate_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-07
11:28:03 UTC ---
Might be remotely related to the issue of PR 46607. (Common cause?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46833
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in expand_vector_operations
(tree-vect-generic.c:340) with
-fno-non-call-exceptions -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46799
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46833
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46820
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: missing
definition with -fgraphite-identity -ffast-math
-fno-tree-dce
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #2 from kuh3h3 at gmail dot com 2010-12-07 12:12:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 22670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22670
preprocessed http_net_log_params.cc file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46835
Summary: need to install
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Repor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46832
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-07
12:36:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 7 12:36:40 2010
New Revision: 167535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167535
Log:
2010-12-07 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46832
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46835
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-07
13:14:51 UTC ---
Simple testcase (to be run with -O -fipa-sra):
struct A
{
int *p;
A() {p = (int *) -1;}
~A() {if (p && p != (int *) -1) *p = 0;}
};
struct B
{
A a;
char data[23];
B() : a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #40 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 13:20:55 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The patch looks reasonable to me. -dsym and -idsym need addition to
> common.opt as driver option I think an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 13:25:18 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Do we really need to support it? DESTDIR just works, and when install
> prefix=/whatever doesn't work already fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-07
13:28:58 UTC ---
ehm, sorry, wrong bug, this is a test case for PR 46734. Of course, I will
have a look at this one soon too, so it can stay assigned to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-07
13:32:37 UTC ---
Simple testcase (to be run with -O -fipa-sra):
struct A
{
int *p;
A() {p = (int *) -1;}
~A() {if (p && p != (int *) -1) *p = 0;}
};
struct B
{
A a;
char data[23];
B() : a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45330
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Froyd 2010-12-07
13:46:32 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Tue Dec 7 13:46:29 2010
New Revision: 167536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167536
Log:
gcc/
PR c++/45330
* params.def (CXX_MAX_NA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46789
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
14:18:40 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 7 14:18:35 2010
New Revision: 167537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167537
Log:
PR other/46789
PR bootstrap/46812
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46812
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
14:18:40 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 7 14:18:35 2010
New Revision: 167537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167537
Log:
PR other/46789
PR bootstrap/46812
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46789
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46812
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45330
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45332
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45331
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36888
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44514
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
Summary: reporting locations for names in std namespace could
be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46401
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:06:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:06:27 2010
New Revision: 167538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167538
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-16 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:08:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:08:54 2010
New Revision: 167539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167539
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-17 Jakub Je
f-4.6 --enable-checking=yes --enable-cloog-backend=isl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101207 (experimental) (GCC)
r167525 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46534
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:11:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:11:46 2010
New Revision: 167540
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167540
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-18 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:12:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:12:45 2010
New Revision: 167541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167541
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-19 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 15:18:41
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:18:39 2010
New Revision: 167542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167542
Log:
Fix PR44676: fix invariant phi node removal.
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:20:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:20:25 2010
New Revision: 167543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167543
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-20 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46499
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:23:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:23:15 2010
New Revision: 167545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167545
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-24 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46629
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:23:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:23:15 2010
New Revision: 167545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167545
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-24 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:25:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:25:48 2010
New Revision: 167546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167546
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-24 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:26:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:26:37 2010
New Revision: 167547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167547
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-02 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46753
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:27:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:27:50 2010
New Revision: 167549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167549
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-02 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42327
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 15:27:55
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:27:50 2010
New Revision: 167548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167548
Log:
Fix PR42327: use build_int_cst.
2010-12-07 Sebasti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42327
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:30:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:30:47 2010
New Revision: 167550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167550
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-06 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43897
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-07
15:33:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:32:58 2010
New Revision: 167551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167551
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-06 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-07
15:37:04 UTC ---
The ICEs in the first and third examples are regressions against 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46401
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 15:49:15 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
> than one place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
16:17:09 UTC ---
Ok, I can confirm that ptype i is better, now, the next problem:
(gdb) ptype a1
type = volatile __unknown__
:-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-07
16:22:55 UTC ---
The -fschedule-insns option alone is sufficient to regress the induct
benchmark...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -fschedule-insns -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90 -o induct
15.57s
gfortran -mtune=co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 16:27:33
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:27:28 2010
New Revision: 167554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167554
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Sebas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
16:33:03 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:32:59 2010
New Revision: 167555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167555
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Seba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-07 16:32:57 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, mrs at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46796
>
> --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
> 2010-12-07 16:17:0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #41 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-07
16:34:34 UTC ---
Yeah, I was thinking of letting them bake just a little bit. -dsym would be
the only driver option, if we make it one. Testing of the C languages and
fortran seems to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
Summary: [OOP] Wrong allocation status for polymorphic
component INTENT(OUT) dummy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #42 from Mike Stump 2010-12-07
16:42:04 UTC ---
Oh, one can use -Wl,-dsym in the time being with this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-07 16:45:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, is it possible to do the change without breaking ABI (i.e. preserving the
> proper relative order for binary built with init_arra/fini_array linked with
> cto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-07
16:48:11 UTC ---
The runtime performance reduction from...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -fschedule-insns -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90 -o induct
compared to...
gfortran -mtune=core2 -ffast-math -O3 induct.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-07
16:48:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
Summary: Parser confuses derived member with std::forward
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-07
17:04:04 UTC ---
The default initializer is obtained via expr.c's gfc_default_initializer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Föhst
2010-12-07 17:12:45 UTC ---
I forgot: Line 15 is only there to prove that this->forward with another
successor than '<' can be resolved as the member derived from A.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #29 from Anh Vo 2010-12-07 17:13:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file
> > gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory, gcc/tm.texi: A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46839
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-12-07
17:19:42 UTC ---
Note that Intel compiler, based on the EDG C++ front-end, also rejects this
code in strict mode. Likewise of course Comeau. This is enough to show the
issue:
template
void forward(T
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
