[Bug ada/35998] debug info invalid x86_64 DW_AT_byte_size 0xffffffff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [ia64] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46546] ix86_pad_returns may leave BB_END (bb) pointing to deleted insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46546 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46534] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE optimizing printf ("...>10MBstring\n") into puts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46534 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/44574] Avoid use of atoi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46548] New: Build arm gcc failure after patch 165463

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548 Summary: Build arm gcc failure after patch 165463 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-18 23:37:15 UTC --- On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > What happens if you remove the gcc_assert at line 338 of varpool.c (see > comment > #8)? hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.1

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-18 23:44:09 UTC --- > hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 bootstraps successfully with the assert removed. Can you also regtest? On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I did not see any regression and powerpc-apple-darwin9

[Bug middle-end/46546] ix86_pad_returns may leave BB_END (bb) pointing to deleted insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46546 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-18 23:46:16 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Nov 18 23:46:13 2010 New Revision: 166921 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166921 Log: PR target/46546 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/46548] Build arm gcc failure after patch 165463

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-18 23:53:19 UTC --- > powerpc-apple-darwin9 is currently regtesting without anything obvious so far > (at obj-c++). My MacPro is darwin9, and I'm only setup to do 32-bit builds at the mom

[Bug tree-optimization/46077] [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077 Matt Hargett changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Bug tree-optimization/46077] [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Severity|crit

[Bug target/46546] ix86_pad_returns may leave BB_END (bb) pointing to deleted insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46546 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|middle-end

[Bug bootstrap/46549] New: MinGW bootstrap failure regarding texi GFPL license

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46549 Summary: MinGW bootstrap failure regarding texi GFPL license Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assign

[Bug debug/46123] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in output_aranges, at dwarf2out.c:11531 with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123 --- Comment #4 from ccoutant at google dot com 2010-11-19 02:17:27 UTC --- > Ugh, this is very ugly.  gen_subprogram_die sometimes decides to reuse old_die > which was DW_AT_declaration and can be deeply nested in type children, which > breaks -fel

[Bug c++/46550] New: [C++0x] Segmentation fault on lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46550 Summary: [C++0x] Segmentation fault on lambda Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 URL: http://ideone.com/pBaLQ Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/46551] New: Generate complex addressing mode CMP instruction in x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46551 Summary: Generate complex addressing mode CMP instruction in x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/46551] Generate complex addressing mode CMP instruction in x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46551 --- Comment #1 from Adam Warner 2010-11-19 02:55:18 UTC --- $ gcc-snapshot.sh --version gcc (Debian 20101116-1) 4.6.0 20101116 (experimental) [trunk revision 166792] $ gcc-snapshot.sh -std=gnu99 -O3 complex_addressing_mode_cmp_inst_not_generated

[Bug c++/46552] New: Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46552 Summary: Internal compiler error on pointer to member variable with template Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/45167] [C++0x] lambda+template="Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45167 Kohei Takahashi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||flast at flast dot jp --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/46550] [C++0x] Segmentation fault on lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46550 Kohei Takahashi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46077] [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW CC|

[Bug c/46553] New: Can't compile libiberty for i386-elf target.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46553 Summary: Can't compile libiberty for i386-elf target. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c/46553] Can't compile libiberty for i386-elf target.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46553 --- Comment #1 from Masaki MURANAKA 2010-11-19 06:34:26 UTC --- Created attachment 22450 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22450 patch

[Bug target/45870] [4.5/4.6 Regression] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-19 07:22:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 19 07:22:22 2010 New Revision: 166932 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166932 Log: PR target/45870 * dwarf2out.c (const_ok_fo

[Bug debug/46123] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in output_aranges, at dwarf2out.c:11531 with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug target/45870] [4.5 Regression] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regr

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-19 07:50:34 UTC --- > However during the GCC compilation we got the following message while > executing > the make all command (there is no error for make all-gcc): > > -

<    1   2