http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-13
09:28:55 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Sat Nov 13 09:28:52 2010
New Revision: 166697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166697
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46204
* sel-sche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20385
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-13 10:01:38
UTC ---
Author: bonzini
Date: Sat Nov 13 10:01:33 2010
New Revision: 166700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166700
Log:
2010-10-30 Paolo Bonzini
PR c/20385
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45742
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-13
10:29:08 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 13 10:29:04 2010
New Revision: 166701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166701
Log:
2010-11-13 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45742
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-13
11:46:32 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 13 11:46:25 2010
New Revision: 166702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166702
Log:
2010-11-13 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46461
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: invalid argument to gimple call
at -O with __builtin_memset()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166700 caused new C test
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46463
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
objc.dg/attributes/method-format-1.m
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46463
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |testsuite
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46464
Summary: libiberty pointer size assumptions for Win64 incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46463
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46460
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46461
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-13 16:19:38
UTC ---
Author: bonzini
Date: Sat Nov 13 16:19:33 2010
New Revision: 166711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166711
Log:
2010-11-13 Paolo Bonzini
PR c/46462
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46465
Summary: ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394 with -Os
-fno-rerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-ccp
-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-13 16:27:24
UTC ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr14963.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr14963.c (test for excess errors)
I actually new about this, it's PR45062.
The Objective-C failures are bad.
The other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45742
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-13
17:25:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 13 17:25:28 2010
New Revision: 166715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166715
Log:
2010-11-13 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45742
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-13
17:23:54 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 13 17:23:49 2010
New Revision: 166714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166714
Log:
2010-11-13 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45742
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
Summary: [C++0X] ICE when using constexpr with
-fno-elide-constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|jakub at redh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46467
Summary: [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pta-structcopy-1.c
FAILs with -fipa-pta without inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46467
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436
--- Comment #39 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-13
18:42:01 UTC ---
I ran comparsion on x86-64 comparing mainline with GCC 4.3.
We get bigger sum of object sizes, but results are not too bad overall.
Main code size grains are:
222 jikespg-1.3src/remsp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42889
--- Comment #22 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-13
18:52:00 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Nov 13 18:51:57 2010
New Revision: 166719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166719
Log:
PR debug/42889
* df-scan.c (df_insn_rescan): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46467
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-13
18:52:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 22386
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22386
patch
Bah, the IPA fn parameters all have size 1, so the overlap check in the
struct copy case of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-13
19:01:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This avoids the segfault. But what is lang_specific and why is it not set in
> problem case? Where does it normally get set?
lang_specific allows to attac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436
--- Comment #40 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-13
19:02:03 UTC ---
Ahh, got the signs wrong. Those was main wins, main growths are
-3101 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/ext3/superb
-1622 compilervasb
-1597 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformdrivers/c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39622
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2010-11-13 19:45:15
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Sat Nov 13 19:45:12 2010
New Revision: 166720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166720
Log:
2010-11-13 Georg-Johann Lay
PR bootstrap/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39622
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39472
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468
Summary: enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed:
inline clone is needed at -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46453
--- Comment #1 from npl at chello dot at 2010-11-13 22:41:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 22388
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22388
Partial patch inplementing 32 and 64 bit bswaps. diffed against gcc 4.5.1
Well, I went ahead an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43440
--- Comment #11 from Richard Earnshaw 2010-11-13
23:08:31 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Sat Nov 13 23:08:26 2010
New Revision: 166723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166723
Log:
PR target/43440
* tm.texi.in (OVERLA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43440
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-14 00:59:03
UTC ---
As of revision 166721, I still see
FAIL: c-c++-common/raw-string-8.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/direct2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/direct2s.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46462
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-14 01:01:58
UTC ---
Patches have been posted, I'm waiting for Objective-C maintainers to (not)
object before committing. The warnings you see are cured by the c-decl.c part:
the behavior of choosing int
45 matches
Mail list logo