http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43706
--- Comment #24 from Johannes Singler 2010-11-12
08:15:56 UTC ---
If only one out of 35 tests becomes slower, I would rather blame it to this one
(probably badly parallelized) application, not the OpenMP runtime system. So I
would suggest a thre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
Steffen Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.0
--- Comment #3 from Steffen Schmi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2010-11-12 09:06:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Nov 12 09:06:37 2010
New Revision: 166645
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166645
Log:
2010-11-11 Rodrigo Rivas Costa
PR lto/4637
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] symbol `__copy_...' is already
defined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gordon.magnusson at gmail
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Ozkan Sezer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45343
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t7 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45759
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
Summary: Class in a CPP override a class from another CPP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-12
09:57:23 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 12 09:57:20 2010
New Revision: 166646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166646
Log:
PR debug/46375
* emit-rtl.c (remove_ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
Salvatore Filippone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sfilippone at uniroma2 dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46430
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-12 10:09:42 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Nov 12 10:09:39 2010
New Revision: 166647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166647
Log:
PR target/46430
* config/avr/avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46430
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-12 10:25:06
UTC ---
I can reproduce it with 4.4 r166509 as follows:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /mnt/svn/gcc-4_4/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22376|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-12
10:48:47 UTC ---
The reduced testcase compiled with -O generates a SIGBUS at run time:
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0 testE () at pr45722.c:50
50x = sE;
0x00010860 <+10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-11-12
10:51:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So this gets fixed by moving the testcase to a different directory for x86_32
> ?
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-scal-opt.c scan-tree-dump-times veclow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
--- Comment #2 from charles.gorand.dev at gmail dot com 2010-11-12 11:12:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> this is not valid C++,
A warning or an error message should be generated so ?
> you can't have two globally-visible classes with the
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-12 11:23:51 UTC ---
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814
>
> Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-12
11:30:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 12 11:30:27 2010
New Revision: 166650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166650
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #28 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-12
11:20:12 UTC ---
AFAICS Dave's analysis still holds. The problematic insn is
(insn 88 87 89 5 (set (reg:DI 134 [ x$l ])
(mem/c:DI (reg/f:SI 185) [0 MEM[(struct E *)&sE]+0 S8 A8]))
pr45722.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-12
11:28:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 12 11:28:32 2010
New Revision: 166649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166649
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-03 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43706
--- Comment #25 from Alexander Peslyak
2010-11-12 11:19:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> If only one out of 35 tests becomes slower,
You might have misread what I wrote. I did not mention "35 tests"; I mentioned
that a test became slower
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-12
11:50:53 UTC ---
No, it isn't unfortunately fixed anywhere.
vect.exp unfortunately only puts the correct options as default options (if no
dg-options is provided).
I guess either the testcase should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-12
11:54:42 UTC ---
Hmmh, finally that patch wasn't good enough. I modified it and posted
another one to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01277.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46441
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44691
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-12
11:58:25 UTC ---
*** Bug 46441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-12
12:04:52 UTC ---
"dodji at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-12
> 11:54:42 UTC ---
> Hmmh, finally that patch wasn't good enough. I modified it and posted
> ano
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46446
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46432
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-12 12:10:44 UTC ---
FWIW, following the GNU coding standard advice on 'swallowing the semicolon'
avoids the warning:
Index: config/v850/v850.h
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-12
12:05:55 UTC ---
Finally the patch I pasted earlier wasn't good enough. I modified it
and proposed it to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01277.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
--- Comment #4 from charles.gorand.dev at gmail dot com 2010-11-12 12:17:02 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is it a warning/error impossible? It seems a pretty easy error to make.
>
> How you tried compiling with other C++ compiler, like Clang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46439
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-linux
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46442
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46450
Summary: xstormy16-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-12
13:01:56 UTC ---
(insn 88 87 89 5 (set (reg:DI 134 [ x$l ])
(mem/c:DI (reg/f:SI 185) [0 MEM[(struct E *)&sE]+0 S8 A8]))
pr45722.c:50 -1
(nil))
The memory has MEM_ALIGN 8, but we of co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-12
13:00:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is it a warning/error impossible? It seems a pretty easy error to make.
How can the compiler know that some other file, which it doesn't know about, is
go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-12
13:09:42 UTC ---
The patch in comment #16 makes sense (it's similar to what we do in
memcpy folding to avoid the situation - and to avoid re-writing of
strict-alignment target handling in memory re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #32 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-12
13:14:06 UTC ---
In the long term (read: 4.7) I like to resurrect the lowering of bitfield
accesses from the (old) mem-ref branch and eventually treat unaligned
loads on strict-align targets as bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46433
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-12 13:20:36 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Nov 12 13:20:28 2010
New Revision: 166651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166651
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46433
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46433
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46449
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-12
13:26:40 UTC ---
>From the user point of view, linker and assembler are part of the compiler. So
the question is whether the linker could detect this case. But I guess the
standard answer is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-12
13:48:51 UTC ---
That is a very different issue then. I don't have yes,rtl,df checking trunk,
wonder if it would ICE with additional -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre.
In both cases the call is turned into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40974
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #51 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45813
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2010-11-12
14:09:12 UTC ---
operand_subword => simplify_gen_subreg => simplify_subreg / validate_subreg:
simplify_gen_subreg (outermode=SImode, op=0x20617000, innermode=DFmode,
byte=0) at ../../gcc-4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45705
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46452
Summary: Apparently invalid optimization of bitfield access
(4.5 regression?)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46080
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
--- Comment #9 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-12 14:09:39
UTC ---
trunk r166509 compiles fine, even with -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre:
$ gcc -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre
-fno-tree-pre pr46165.c -c
with yes,rtl,df ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29043
Fabien Chene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46446
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
../gcc-4.6-20101112/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.6
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.6/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-ppl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-mpc=/sw
--with-system-zlib --x-includes=/u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43719
Fabien Chene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-12
14:26:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Fixed for trunk sofar. Let's see if there is any fallout.
>
> This seems to have broken bootstrap on s390x. From a first gla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45819
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-12
14:43:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 12 14:43:19 2010
New Revision: 166652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166652
Log:
2010-11-12 Richard Guenther
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844
Fabien Chene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-12
14:56:54 UTC ---
loop-header copying is where things start to be different.
In the end the asm doesn't make much sense:
parse_ranged.clone.0:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
leaq2(%rdi),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45886
--- Comment #3 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-11-12 15:30:24 UTC ---
Richard, what would be the appropriate target milestone to get this bug fixed?
This needs just a backport of a trivial patch from trunk to 4.5 branch, but
delaying this fix increa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44691
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-12
15:47:46 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Nov 12 15:47:38 2010
New Revision: 166653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166653
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-08-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46451
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-12
15:55:57 UTC ---
Fixing this seems problematic. While config/cloog.m4 currently has the location
of the ppl headers passed to CFLAGS for these tests...
dnl clooglibs & clooginc may have been initiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46447
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422
Quentin Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46453
Summary: MIPS backend is not using special instructions for
__builtin_bswap32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo