http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #9 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-10 08:13:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Aside from Janne's comments about getting rid of this function completely, I
> think the little fix is a candidate for back port to 4.4 and 4.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-10
08:24:59 UTC ---
IMHO, void (double) is fine for a function type: Ian's point about function
type vs pointer to function type fully clarifies the issue for me. If currently
the C++ front-end also uses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
--- Comment #7 from Michael Strashun 2010-11-10
12:37:47 UTC ---
Workaround helped, thanks. Errors were supposed to be, so everything is
alright.
Reducing with delta looks quite not possible to me : after about a day of
processing it managed to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44760
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46171
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-10 12:35:18 UTC ---
I'll give it a try once my current IRIX 6.5 bootstrap finishes (which
may take another couple of hours at least).
But even so, the question remains what's the poi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46407
Summary: rx-elf --enable-werror-all build failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46408
Summary: [OOP] Segfault when running
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_6.f03
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
12:44:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 22365
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22365
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46405
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-10 10:25:51 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
>
> Jack Howarth changed:
>
>What|Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
11:07:40 UTC ---
typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t;
typedef uint64_t hdb_handle_t;
struct corosync_api_v1 {
int (*plugin_interface_release) (hdb_handle_t handle);
};
struct corosync_servic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46407
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-10 11:29:03 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 10 11:29:00 2010
New Revision: 166529
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166529
Log:
PR target/46407
* config/rx/rx.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #18 from Anitha Boyapati
2010-11-10 10:38:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created attachment 22339 [details] [details]
> > Initial patch to fix the bug
> >
> > BB reordering pass is suppressed for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44760
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-10 09:16:23 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 10 09:16:19 2010
New Revision: 166523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166523
Log:
PR target/44760
* config/iq2000/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46406
Summary: nothing
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
10:59:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 10 10:59:20 2010
New Revision: 166527
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166527
Log:
2010-11-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier
2010-11-10 09:39:16 UTC ---
Since currently there is no support for general TM escape block, I think it is
a workaround that needs to be changed when this support will be added.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-10 10:55:57 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 10 10:55:51 2010
New Revision: 166526
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166526
Log:
Add PR marker to ChangeLog entry:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-10 10:31:10 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10
> 09:45:28 UTC ---
> I couldn't reproduce this.
> r166509, CC='gcc -m3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46401
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-10
12:47:26 UTC ---
> Used the same configure line as you do (except left out java), still couldn't
> reproduce it.
I cannot reproduce with a cross from x86_64-linux either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46407
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-10
12:24:05 UTC ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01013.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-10
12:52:32 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Nov 10 12:52:27 2010
New Revision: 166535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166535
Log:
2010-11-10 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-10
12:52:32 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Nov 10 12:52:27 2010
New Revision: 166535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166535
Log:
2010-11-10 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44764
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-10 10:07:24 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 10 10:07:18 2010
New Revision: 166524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166524
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/44764
* addr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #14 from Sean McGovern 2010-11-10
12:27:39 UTC ---
Succcessfully bootstrapped with the attached patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10
11:52:55 UTC ---
Used the same configure line as you do (except left out java), still couldn't
reproduce it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44764
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #19 from Georg Lay 2010-11-10 13:00:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I think BBreordering after the end of epilogue in case of normal functions is
> little confusing.
Yes, optimized code is often confusing.
> I am not sure wha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Linker options no longer accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
Paul Pryor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppryor63 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411
Summary: MOVE_ALLOC wrongly rejected as impure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46412
Summary: bfin-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46408
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2010-11-10 13:09:31
UTC ---
> biosdevname:gcc: error: unrecognized option '-all-static'
This is only a libtool option.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
13:12:24 UTC ---
#2 0x008c620a in add_var_loc_to_decl (decl=0x77628058, loc_note=0x76fef3e8,
label=0x76c0b7a0 "*.LVL884") at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:8221
8221 gcc_assert (temp->
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-10 13:13:06 UTC ---
Yes, these options were ignored in general; the driver would have
translated -- to -f, but the linker specs don't pass down -f options, and
now -- is only translated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
13:14:33 UTC ---
Breakpoint 2, add_var_loc_to_decl (decl=0x77628058, loc_note=0x7700c028,
label=0x76c41630 "*.LVL859") at ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:8165
8165 slot = htab_find_slot_with_hash (d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-10 13:28:21 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
>
> --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-10
13:31:42 UTC ---
Is there a reason why the test case is an i386 only test case? Given it's
known to fail on powerpc*-linux and alpha-linux, it should probably be a arch
independent test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in propagate_rtx, at fwprop.c:688
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46409
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-10 13:39:26 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
>
> --- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-10
> 13:31:42
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31528
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44964
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46413
Summary: [OOP] ICE when printing a polymorphic type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-10
13:57:29 UTC ---
Agreed, but in this case, since we're just looking for the symbol names, I
think it should work. If we were to try and create a ppc specific test, I
can't see how it would be differe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
14:06:04 UTC ---
It is caused by breaking edges to callees for always-inline functions when
topologically sorting the cgraph. And cgraph_flatten misses a check
for matching SSA form like other inli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-10 14:38:12 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> OTOH gcj is invoked as
>
> gcj -Wno-deprecated -findirect-dispatch -Bsymbolic -C --classpath
> .:/usr/share/ja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46414
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/recip-vec-sqrtf-avx.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46414
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |diagnostic
--- Comment #4 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-10
15:24:28 UTC ---
> Should we change the expected demangling in 14.cc to
> be void foo() or should we do something else.
I think 14.cc should be foo(). Your change is ok with
me.
FWIW, this is als
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #15 from Dave Korn 2010-11-10 15:39:53
UTC ---
Thanks for testing!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46415
Summary: mmix-knuth-mmixware --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44964
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-10
16:05:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 10 16:05:03 2010
New Revision: 166543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166543
Log:
2010-11-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10
16:11:21 UTC ---
BTW, even 4.4 has the character(kind=1) A.20[3][1:5]; var referenced into the
actual arg to pfoo in a block which doesn't overlap the block of the afoo call.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-10
16:06:51 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Nov 10 16:06:47 2010
New Revision: 166544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166544
Log:
Fix PR45971: do not predicate condition phi nodes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44964
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-10
16:46:17 UTC ---
Yep, looks right to me
void (double) is a function type
void (*)(double) is a pointer to such a function type
void (&)(double) is a reference to such a type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46416
Summary: libquadmath: Complex inverse hyperbolic/trigonometric
function missing: casinhq etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2010-11-10
17:01:42 UTC ---
template class vector { };
struct A{};
template
void complete_test(vector data1){
A drop=A();
}
int main(){
vector vect1;
complete_test(vect1);
}
Fine with -std=c++98 but n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46417
Summary: spu-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46415
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-10 17:18:28 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 10 17:18:22 2010
New Revision: 166545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166545
Log:
PR target/46415
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46415
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-10 17:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41012
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42970
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-10 17:27:09 UTC ---
> Well, as soon as you upgrade your binutils or install gold, it will start
> working.
gold doesn't work on any of my platforms, and GNU ld only on Solaris.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46414
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-10
17:34:02 UTC ---
The #c6 testcase doesn't appear related to the original one, thus please file
it separately. I'd say this bug should just be closed, ideally with the
testcase going into the testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39689
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-10
17:34:05 UTC ---
We now have leaf attribute that makes it possible to analyze many of cases.
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo