http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-09
08:23:18 UTC ---
> Scary stuff. I will look into it nevertheless.
Thanks. There are a couple of other similar cases in PR tree-opt/46349 and
tree-opt/46377, although the latter is probably a duplica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46386
Summary: negative shift count in build_constants_constructor
for 16 bit pointer targets
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28627
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #8 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-09 09:49:20 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 9 09:49:14 2010
New Revision: 166477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166477
Log:
2010-11-09 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46385
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-09
10:14:02 UTC ---
Thanks very much, Jason. I'll make use of this in the library today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-09 10:13:59 UTC ---
I've just had another report in private mail about Solaris 10 bootstrap
failing because errors out if not used in a C99 compilation.
It seems this is highly unport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #14 from Anitha Boyapati
2010-11-09 10:24:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 22339
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22339
Initial patch to fix the bug
BB reordering pass is suppressed for naked functions. Also suppresse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #15 from Anitha Boyapati
2010-11-09 10:26:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Implement TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P and respect epilogue_completed and
> cfun->machine->is_naked. This will stop BB reorder and similar post-epilogue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
10:36:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 9 10:36:24 2010
New Revision: 166479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166479
Log:
2010-11-09 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09 10:39:52 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Nov 9 10:39:46 2010
New Revision: 166480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166480
Log:
2010-11-09 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46380
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31490
Nicolas VEYSSIERE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicolas.veyssiere at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in add_stores, at
var-tracking.c:5415
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
11:01:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 22341
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22341
required stack-protector support patch
Required patch.
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Summary: [C++0X] no matching function with default template
argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46396
Summary: gcc not detect caches for VIA CPUs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in add_var_loc_to_decl, at
dwarf2out.c:8221
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46390
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46389
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-09
11:54:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 9 11:54:32 2010
New Revision: 166482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166482
Log:
PR middle-end/46360
* tree-ssa-propagate.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46390
--- Comment #2 from edwin at svi dot nl 2010-11-09 12:11:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's correct, if you don't want it to be moved (or removed in case the
> result
> is unused), use asm volatile.
Thanks! I wasn't aware of the asm vol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] OOP-ABI issue,|[OOP] class container
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
Component|midd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-09
12:59:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22344
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22344
pr46150.ii
Partially reduced testcase, gave up after several days of running delta on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09 11:54:18 UTC ---
r166480 fixes the original test case.
As Tobias pointed out at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00120.html
there may be additional problems when defining derived ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at
stor-layout.c:493
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46391
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
13:18:47 UTC ---
On x86_64 restrict information is there (-fdump-tree-optimized-alias):
:
# PT = nonlocal { PARM_RESTRICT.0 } (restr)
vect_p.27_71 = c_8(D) + prolog_loop_niters.16_27;
# PT =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46391
--- Comment #2 from Roy Rosen 2010-11-09 13:48:15
UTC ---
Seems to me that also on ia64 it is there but the dependecies are still wrong:
;; Function nor (nor)
nor (char * restrict c, char * restrict d)
{
long unsigned int D.2085;
long unsig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-09
12:47:56 UTC ---
The first patch bootstrapped/regtested fine on both x86_64-linux and
i686-linux, the second one caused a couple of regressions on x86_64-linux (and
worked fine on i686-linux):
FAIL: g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-09
11:53:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 9 11:52:59 2010
New Revision: 166481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166481
Log:
PR c++/45894
* tree.c (lvalue_kind): Don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46390
Summary: cpuid assembly instruction is optimized away in loop
over threads.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46391
Summary: false dependencies are computed after vectorization
(#2)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
13:45:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 9 13:45:45 2010
New Revision: 166489
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166489
Log:
2010-11-09 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46392
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09
13:14:55 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 9 13:14:48 2010
New Revision: 166486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166486
Log:
Call get_input_file_name to get file name.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46392
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46392
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166473 failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-09
13:51:39 UTC ---
For completeness: The issues reported in comment 0 were all [(a), (b), and (c)]
due to same problem: The internal class symbols only encoded the derived-type
name.
This has been fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #6 from e01reynier at gmail dot com 2010-11-09 13:39:33 UTC ---
It should solve my problem.
Thanks a lot !
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46393
Summary: m68k code size regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46387
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-09
15:20:47 UTC ---
The interesting insns here are:
(insn:TI 70 272 60 5 (set (reg:BI 262 p6 [394])
(ge:BI (reg:SI 16 r16 [orig:347 prephitmp.13 ] [347])
(const_int 0 [0]))) pr46387.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46395
Summary: [4.6 regression] FAIL:
22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc execution test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46395
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46392
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46377
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Summary: lto-plugin.c does not build on Solaris 10/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46396
--- Comment #1 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2010-11-09
15:18:04 UTC ---
PS If you think it possible, you may use more complex (+1 hunk) VIA detection
patch, attached to Bug #45359.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46386
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-09
13:52:03 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Nov 9 13:51:57 2010
New Revision: 166490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166490
Log:
2010-11-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
15:01:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 9 15:01:41 2010
New Revision: 166492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166492
Log:
2010-11-09 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46382
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-11-09
15:47:23 UTC ---
Nice! Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36489
Jan Kunigk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at linux dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-09
15:52:30 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Nov 9 15:52:24 2010
New Revision: 166495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166495
Log:
2010-11-09 Andreas Krebbel
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-09
15:53:22 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Nov 9 15:53:18 2010
New Revision: 166496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166496
Log:
2010-11-09 Andreas Krebbel
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
--- Comment #2 from dann frazier 2010-11-09 15:55:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 22347
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22347
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
--- Comment #3 from dann frazier 2010-11-09 15:57:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 22348
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22348
intermediate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46237
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Kreb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43706
--- Comment #23 from Alexander Peslyak
2010-11-09 16:32:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Maybe we could agree on a compromise for a start. Alexander, what are the
> corresponding results for GOMP_SPINCOUNT=10?
I reproduced slowdown of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09 16:32:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Here is an example code which still fails (analogous to comment #0):
One way to fix this is to use the top-level namespace (i.e. program or module)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
Summary: early FRE miscompiles simple testcase
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-11-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46398
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
16:49:48 UTC ---
-O1 on any platform with the following patch applied (or not-yet-found
carefully
crafted disabling of passes before the existing FRE pass):
Index: gcc/passes.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
16:54:11 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 9 16:54:05 2010
New Revision: 166498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166498
Log:
2010-11-09 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-09
17:02:21 UTC ---
Actually, if this happens also in error messages cannot be a demangler issue
only. I'm pretty sure to have seen this behavior mentioned already... Ian, any
hint?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-09 17:07:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> One way to fix this is to use the top-level namespace (i.e. program or module)
> for the naming of the internal symbols, instead of the direct pare
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Summary: Missing type promotion for library call argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46399
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo