http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40935
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20518
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|danglin at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #24 from Tobias Burnus 2010
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46341
Summary: [C++0X] ICE: in cxx_eval_vec_init_1, at
cp/semantics.c:6362
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46340
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46342
Summary: I am a student.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Repor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46343
Summary: I am a student.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Repor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46337
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46337
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359
Dzianis Kahanovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #0|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46332
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
Component|li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46336
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46341
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-07
11:45:18 UTC ---
I have posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-11/msg00551.html
the result of the regtest with the patch in comment #5. The patch fixes this PR
without adding regre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
Summary: [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46345
Summary: ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46345
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sfilippone at uniroma2 dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-07
13:07:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> *** Bug 46345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
That PR contains a longer test case: attachment 22307
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-07 13:16:29 UTC ---
Here's a variant:
module m
type t1
end type
type t2
class(t1), allocatable :: cc
end type
class(t2), allocatable :: sm
end module m
program p
use m
im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-07 13:22:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here's a variant:
Side remark: In comment #4, if I change the name of 'sm' to 'y', I get:
end module m
1
Internal Error at (1):
write
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-07
13:39:37 UTC ---
Revision 162456 compiles the tests, but not revision 166102. When compiled, the
executable for pr46345 gives
Check 0: T
a.out(84352) malloc: *** error for object 0x13072:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-07
13:53:58 UTC ---
> Could this pr be related to pr45585?
The fix for pr45585 does not works for this pr.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46337
--- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2010-11-07 14:09:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 22308
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22308
Test case
This test case evokes the bug with the 16-bit msp430 target, which is not
integrated into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41617
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46331
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-07
14:32:47 UTC ---
Patch: The part removed too agressively decides if an expression is constant.
In the case of rand(), the result obviously does not reduce to a constant but
the array constructor was e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #7 from Salvatore Filippone
2010-11-07 14:58:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Revision 162456 compiles the tests, but not revision 166102. When compiled,
> the
> executable for pr46345 gives
>
> Check 0: T
> a.out(84352) mall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
Summary: [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46340
Jeff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46347
Summary: Profile-mode executables too large
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-07 15:49:48
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 166167:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-11/msg00053.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
Summary: [C++0x] ICE with constexpr default constructor and
array member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-07 16:15:39
UTC ---
A trivial attempt that fixes builtin-attr-1.c for x86 with -mfma:
Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c
===
--- tree-ssa-forwprop.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40171
Dzianis Kahanovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mahatma at eu dot by
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-07
17:07:00 UTC ---
Last patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-07 17:39:16 UTC ---
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
>
> --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-07
> 16:15:39 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-07 17:49:15 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 7 17:49:11 2010
New Revision: 166419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166419
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46346
* tree-ss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46346
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-07
18:09:35 UTC ---
Ah, now I see the patch, thanks Jason!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-07
18:45:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22309
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22309
Apply to current v3 to see ICEs in the testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-07
19:01:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> The forward-1.m test has been moved to objc.dg/torture (so that is also
> exercises with lto) and confined to m32 NeXT runtime.
I think this is the wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-07
19:07:45 UTC ---
This:
template<__SIZE_TYPE__ _Nw>
struct _Base
{
typedef unsigned long _WordT;
_WordT _M_w[_Nw];
constexpr
_Base()
: _M_w() { }
};
int main()
{
_Base<25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #25 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-07 19:44:07 UTC ---
> The change was r166378 and if the test failures are the only reason to keep
> this bug report open then it we should be able to close it now.
Closing would be ok if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-07
19:45:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 22310
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22310
Testcase, file #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-07
19:46:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 22311
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22311
Testcase, file #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe 2010-11-07 19:55:00
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Nov 7 19:54:51 2010
New Revision: 166421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166421
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR libobjc/36610
* objc.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46311
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hans.Boehm at hp dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
Summary: s-taprop.adb:891:40: warning: redundant conversion,
expression is of type "Interrupt_ID"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization (2)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-07
20:38:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 22312
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22312
opt10.adb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-07
20:38:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 22313
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22313
opt10_pkg.ads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org |xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-07 21:12:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The ICE can be fixed with the following patch:
Here is a better patch which has the same effect:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46352
Summary: ICE: division by zero with -fdump-tree-tracer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-07
21:32:12 UTC ---
> Why double_int does not use the widest int type for low/high part on the host?
Not clear what you mean; it uses HOST_WIDE_INT like the rest of the compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Summary: [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354
Summary: attribute((aligned(...))) can incorrectly decrease
structure field alignment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354
--- Comment #1 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2010-11-07 22:43:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 22314
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22314
sample code to demonstrate structure field offsets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-07
23:00:25 UTC ---
Generally GCC lays out structures based on the types of the elemets, not
based on the alignment specified on fields. Which is why I think what you
see is correct and intended.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
Jay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.1 |4.6.0
--- Comment #17 from Jay 2010-11-07 23:01:14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46351
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46334
--- Comment #1 from Jay 2010-11-07 23:08:17 UTC
---
Created attachment 22315
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22315
toplevel config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46334
--- Comment #2 from Jay 2010-11-07 23:08:57 UTC
---
Created attachment 22316
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22316
libcpp config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46334
--- Comment #3 from Jay 2010-11-07 23:10:50 UTC
---
jkr...@login [login]:~/src > ssh current10s
Last login: Sun Nov 7 23:09:51 2010 from login.bo.opencs
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.10 Generic January 2005
-bash-4.1$ cd obj
-bash-4.1$ mk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772
--- Comment #6 from Dale Stimson 2010-11-07
23:18:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 22317
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22317
Backport of Jakub's patch from 4.6 trunk to 4.5.1.
The attached patch for gcc 4.5.1 is provided in ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #9 from davidxl 2010-11-07 23:22:30
UTC ---
For i686 target, the HOST_WIDE_INT is 'long int' -- not 'long long'.
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46354
--- Comment #3 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2010-11-07 23:33:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Generally GCC lays out structures based on the types of the elemets, not
> based on the alignment specified on fields.
according to the gcc docs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #10 from davidxl 2010-11-08 00:08:38
UTC ---
Need define need_64bit_host_wide_int in configuration which is not done by
default.
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08
00:53:17 UTC ---
> For i686 target, the HOST_WIDE_INT is 'long int' -- not 'long long'.
Yes, this is the default. By default we don't require a 64-bit type on the
host for a 32-bit target, only for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #18 from Jay 2010-11-08 00:57:29 UTC
---
more gcc_unreachable and then functions not returning, slightly 4.5.1 with Sun
CC (C++):
see
http://hudson.modula3.com:8080/job/cm3-current-m3cc-I386_SOLARIS-opencsw-current10x/105/console
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Summary|ICE: SIGSEGV in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46334
--- Comment #4 from Jay 2010-11-08 01:10:25 UTC
---
another, this is an older Darwin/powerpc machine, using some version of g++
http://hudson.modula3.com:8080/job/cm3-current-m3cc-PPC_DARWIN/93/consoleFull
g++ -g -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in create_preheader
(cfgloopmanip.c:1336) with -O -fstrict-overflow
-ftree-loop-distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46331
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
Summary: Erroneous procedure/intent error and ICE for class
dummy argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46089
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
04:34:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Nov 8 04:34:32 2010
New Revision: 166427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166427
Log:
gcc/:
PR target/46089
* config/i386/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46089
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
--- Comment #8 from Dave Korn 2010-11-08 04:52:12
UTC ---
The generated source file selfassign.so.ltrans0.s (and hence also the object
file selfassign.so.ltrans0.ltrans.o) file which gets created when lto-plugin
invokes lto1 on the original input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357
Summary: Unnecessary movzx instruction
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2010-11-08 06:27:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This appears to be because plugin_init in selfassign.c isn't marked with
> __attribute__((externally_visible)), and the resolution file marks it as
> PREVAILING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #13 from davidxl 2010-11-08 07:13:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Won't there be similar problem when using TImode IVs on 64-bit targets (e.g.
> __int128 or int __attribute__((mode (TI ?
> Normally overflows are detected wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
