[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] Missing ifcvt

2010-11-03 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 --- Comment #4 from davidxl 2010-11-04 00:55:35 UTC --- Another case that needs to be handled (none of the compiler tested handle it) For ifcvt to happen, control flow needs to be simplified (for case of if-then-else if ..) this is possible whe

[Bug target/46285] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2642 with -mavx -fsplit-stack

2010-11-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-04 02:09:18 UTC --- Please try this diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c index 8b8cbcf..de705b0 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

2010-11-03 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 Summary: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

2010-11-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-04 02:15:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 4 02:15:00 2010 New Revision: 166296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166296 Log: PR c++/46289 * call.c (can_convert_array):

[Bug c++/46293] constexpr vs. tuple, ice

2010-11-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46293 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-04 02:15:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 4 02:15:08 2010 New Revision: 166297 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166297 Log: PR c++/46293 * semantics.c (build_data_memb

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

2010-11-03 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-04 02:16:26 UTC --- Created attachment 22271 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22271 auto-reduced testcase

[Bug target/46285] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2642 with -mavx -fsplit-stack

2010-11-03 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-04 02:32:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Please try this > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c > index 8b8cbcf..de705b0 100644 >

[Bug c++/46289] [4.6 regression] ICE in build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at cp/semantics.c:5513

2010-11-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46293] constexpr vs. tuple, ice

2010-11-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46293 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46277] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166167 failed to build 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000

2010-11-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46298] New: constexpr ICE on ARM

2010-11-03 Thread cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298 Summary: constexpr ICE on ARM Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/46297] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/980701-0.f FAILs with -Os -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables

2010-11-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46228] code produced for STL container is worse in 4.5.1 than in 4.4.5

2010-11-03 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-04 04:44:30 UTC --- "- we need to improve heuristics to figure out that inlining is smaller than call sequence (if it really is)" Well, we can't do that here. What I missed is that the function in questi

<    1   2   3