http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-03
07:37:54 UTC ---
I did some debugging and found out that I only see the ICE on x86-64-linux if I
use:
export MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1))
(current value: 191)
If I do not set that variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46128
--- Comment #4 from Jacob Bramley 2010-11-03
07:59:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please complete the "Known to work", "Known to fail", "Version" and "Target
> Milestone" and any other useful details you can add. I can then move this
> o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
08:30:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 08:30:21 2010
New Revision: 166231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166231
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46034
PR rtl-optimizati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
08:30:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 08:30:21 2010
New Revision: 166231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166231
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46034
PR rtl-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
08:30:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 08:30:21 2010
New Revision: 166231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166231
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/46034
PR rtl-optimizati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
08:38:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 08:38:42 2010
New Revision: 166232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166232
Log:
PR debug/46252
* reload1.c (delete_dead_ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46275
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-03 08:47:48
UTC ---
For some reason, the addend in R_386_GOTPC reloc is missing when compiled with
-masm=intel. The objdump difference between -masm=att [hello.o] that works and
-masm=intel [hello_.o] that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46142
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44455
Andreas Beckmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at abeckmann dot de
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-11-03 09:14:36
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Wed Nov 3 09:14:32 2010
New Revision: 166233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166233
Log:
ChangeLog:
2010-11-03 Ian Lance Taylor
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-03
09:14:59 UTC ---
Last draft patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00274.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46174
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-03
09:18:32 UTC ---
Draft patch for $free/$copy (w/o FINALize, cf. PR 37336):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00030.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
09:49:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 09:49:16 2010
New Revision: 166234
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166234
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46107
* cfgloopmanip.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
09:57:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 09:57:13 2010
New Revision: 166235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166235
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46128
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Severity|minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
10:34:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 10:34:34 2010
New Revision: 166236
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166236
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46165
* tree-ssa-pre.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
--- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-03 10:45:46 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 3 10:45:40 2010
New Revision: 166238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166238
Log:
PR bootstrap/44335
gcc:
* targho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46274
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46279
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46281
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46282
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
11:05:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 11:05:39 2010
New Revision: 166239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166239
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
11:14:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 22246
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22246
patch
FYI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-03 11:35:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can go either way. Which one would you prefer?
Please add -msse for all x86 targets for tests that deal with vectors.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22245|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03
12:02:09 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Nov 3 12:02:06 2010
New Revision: 166240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166240
Log:
Generate avx_vzeroupper after reload is comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-03 12:10:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> > Hi HJ, I'm getting a ton of failures caused by this same warning message
> > at
> > r166110 on i686-pc-cygwin:
>
> Same on i586-suse-linux.
See PR 46280.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44749
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-03 12:15:16 UTC ---
mep-elf still doesn't build when configured with --enable-werror-always.
gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wstrict-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
12:20:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 12:20:28 2010
New Revision: 166241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166241
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22050|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Severity|critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46282
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46286
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-03 12:55:41 UTC
---
Also affects i386-pc-solaris2.10, sparc-sun-solaris2.10, mips-sgi-irix6.5.
Proposed patch allows bootstrap to continue on Solaris 10/x86, but later rans
into
another ICE:
/vol/gcc/src/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46287
Summary: No thunk info on call graph edges leads to
miscompilations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46287
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-03 13:11:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 22250
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22250
preprocessed insn-recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-03 13:12:51
UTC ---
After the fix for PR tree-optimization/46286 went in, I'm seeing this ICE, too:
Running
$ cc1 -fpreprocessed insn-recog.i -quiet -dumpbase insn-recog.c -mtune=generic
-march=pentium4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46274
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
13:16:05 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 13:16:02 2010
New Revision: 166243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166243
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
13:30:52 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 13:30:48 2010
New Revision: 166244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166244
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-03
13:31:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 3 13:31:40 2010
New Revision: 166245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166245
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46274
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43231
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46288
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_gimple_op (gimple.c:2857) with -O
-fno-tree-dce and __builtin_expect()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46275
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46275
--- Comment #9 from hezekiahehud at gmail dot com 2010-11-03 14:12:57 UTC ---
Thank you. :-)
(In reply to comment #8)
> It is an assembler bug. Intel syntax isn't well tested. I will
> try to fix it:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in
build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers, at
cp/semantics.c:5513
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-03 14:29:48 UTC
---
Btw., I saw the same issue on i386-pc-solaris2.10, but this is now hidden by
PR bootstrap/46018.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46001
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46009
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-03
15:18:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 3 15:18:50 2010
New Revision: 166251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166251
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46009
* tree-ssa-phiop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46288
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-03
15:22:29 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 3 15:22:25 2010
New Revision: 166252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166252
Log:
2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45985
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-03
15:27:53 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 3 15:27:48 2010
New Revision: 166253
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166253
Log:
2010-11-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46290
Summary: explicit instantiation: inconsistant behaviour between
constructor and member functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-03
15:33:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 3 15:33:05 2010
New Revision: 166254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166254
Log:
PR c++/46277
* init.c (expand_default_init)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46289
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45965
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46022
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46257
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45872
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-03
15:44:35 UTC ---
The patch in comment 7 and 8 adds a run-time warning (with -fcheck=bounds) if a
string in a namelist gets truncated.
TODO: Comment 0, namely: Don't warn that a variable is unused, if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44716
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44807
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo