[Bug c++/46103] [c++0x] moving from std::array copies the elements

2010-10-20 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46103 --- Comment #2 from marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-10-20 21:30:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > so this would demonstrate the problem? [snip example] Yes, precisely. > I haven't checked whether this is valid I looked at N3126 aroun

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

2010-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-20 21:39:23 UTC --- (you can edit an existing attachment to set the content type) thanks for the nice minimal testcase, that's very useful I *think* this is a dup of another bug I've seen in bugzilla

[Bug c++/36694] g++-4.2 rejects code, that other versions of gcc accept

2010-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36694 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46107] New: verify_loop_structure problem

2010-10-20 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107 Summary: verify_loop_structure problem Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug debug/46101] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:10333 with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -g

2010-10-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46101 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

2010-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-20 22:46:45 UTC --- I had a look at Cryptopp-SO-Test-1.zip building on 32-bit I can reproduce a segfault it doesn't build on 64-bit at all: 1) you can insert a pointer into an ostream without casting

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

2010-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-20 22:47:59 UTC --- oh, and I only see one process invovled there ... I'm still confused about the claim that more than one process is involved - do you mean more than one thread?!

[Bug c/46107] [4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns caused verify_loop_structure problem

2010-10-20 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

2010-10-20 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton 2010-10-20 23:18:48 UTC --- Hi Johnathon, (In reply to comment #5) > oh, and I only see one process invovled there ... I'm still confused about the > claim that more than one process is involved... My bad - the

[Bug c++/46103] [c++0x] moving from std::array copies the elements

2010-10-20 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46103 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-20 23:26:33 UTC --- What if implicitly-defined move-constructors go away again? If I understand correctly that the bits we are missing are part of the recent work on implicit moves and the Committee ends

CRN Free Subscription

2010-10-20 Thread CRN Magazine
Unparalleled channel insights. Management strategies you can implement now. Impeccable research. These are just a few of the topics highlighted in each issue of CRN magazine, the voice of the channel for over 20 years. As a channel professional, you are entitled to a FREE subscription today: h

[Bug c++/46108] New: constexpr ICE: streambuf_iterator.h:97

2010-10-20 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46108 Summary: constexpr ICE: streambuf_iterator.h:97 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug c++/46108] constexpr ICE: streambuf_iterator.h:97

2010-10-20 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46108 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2010-10-20 23:38:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22101 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22101 pre-processed sources

[Bug target/46080] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect precision of sqrtf builtin for x87 arithmetic (-mfpmath=387)

2010-10-20 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46080 --- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre 2010-10-20 23:43:33 UTC --- But there's something strange in the generated code: sometimes the fsqrt instruction is used, sometimes "call sqrtf" is used (for the same sqrtf() call in the C source). This is not

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

2010-10-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-20 23:48:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hi Johnathon, > (In reply to comment #5) > > oh, and I only see one process invovled there ... I'm still confused about > > the > > claim that more than o

[Bug target/46080] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect precision of sqrtf builtin for x87 arithmetic (-mfpmath=387)

2010-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46080 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-20 23:49:18 UTC --- %.60f You really should use hex float to see the diferences. I bet it is just the final digit of the hex float that is different and only by one. This is actually ok IIRC.

[Bug middle-end/46106] Error in Manpage? -fstack-protection => -fstack-protector(-all)

2010-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46106 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-20 23:52:29 UTC --- gcc.1 is generated from doc/invoke.texi.

[Bug fortran/46079] [4.6 Regression] ABI for empty stop statement broken

2010-10-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46079 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-21 00:45:19 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Oct 21 00:45:15 2010 New Revision: 165746 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165746 Log: 2010-10-20 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran

[Bug fortran/46079] [4.6 Regression] ABI for empty stop statement broken

2010-10-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46079 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

2010-10-20 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton 2010-10-21 02:00:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I had a look at Cryptopp-SO-Test-1.zip > > > > I can see some value in the warning you want, but it's not going to help if > you > don't use the compile

[Bug c++/46109] New: gcc-4.5.0 fails to build on

2010-10-20 Thread yuri at tsoft dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46109 Summary: gcc-4.5.0 fails to build on Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug pch/46110] New: Precompiled headers: GCC fails to properly locate include files

2010-10-20 Thread aleksey.covacevice at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46110 Summary: Precompiled headers: GCC fails to properly locate include files Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug target/36503] x86 can use x >> -y for x >> 32-y

2010-10-20 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36503 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Strange 2010-10-21 04:39:36 UTC --- I built ffmpeg for x86-64 with --disable-asm with the attached patch and the regression tests failed. Reverting the patch fixes them. I saved the binaries but haven't investigated

[Bug lto/46083] gcc.dg/initpri1.c FAILs with -flto/-fwhopr (attribute constructor/destructor doesn't work)

2010-10-20 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46083 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-21 05:32:00 UTC --- > Honza, maybe your constructor re-ordering doesn't honor priority? It should via the same logic as non-ELF ctor/dtor code does, but I will double check. Honza

[Bug c++/46103] [c++0x] moving from std::array copies the elements

2010-10-20 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46103 --- Comment #4 from marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-10-21 05:36:58 UTC --- Adding an explicit A(A&&)=default; doesn't help, so I don't think this is related to the implicit stuff. More like a missing piece of code telling the compiler how t

[Bug c++/46109] gcc-4.5.0 fails to build on

2010-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46109 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6

2010-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yuri at tsoft dot com --- Comment #78 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/46107] [4.6 Regression] -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns caused verify_loop_structure problem

2010-10-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/46100] [Fortran 2008] Non-variable pointer expression as actual argument to INTENT(OUT) non-pointer dummy

2010-10-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46100 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-21 06:15:34 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Oct 21 06:15:30 2010 New Revision: 165749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165749 Log: 2010-10-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug fortran/46100] [Fortran 2008] Non-variable pointer expression as actual argument to INTENT(OUT) non-pointer dummy

2010-10-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46100 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2