http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-10-14
07:56:50 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Thu Oct 14 07:56:47 2010
New Revision: 165454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165454
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45570
* sel-sched-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-14
08:09:04 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
--nml.dat---
&namtoptrc
tracer(1) = 'Aa', .true.
tracer(2) = 'Bb', .true.
tracer(3) = 'Cc', .true.
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46011
Summary: 256bit vectorizer failed on double->int
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46011
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-14
08:33:13 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Oct 14 08:33:09 2010
New Revision: 165457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165457
Log:
Scan 256bit AVX register and xfail vectorize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46011
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46012
Summary: 256bit vectorizer failed on int->double
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46012
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-03
05:41:44 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Oct 3 05:39:32 2010
New Revision: 164914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164914
Log:
Disallow negative steps in vectorizer.
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44913
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46013
Summary: crash when compiling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Summary: internal compiler error compiling clamav-0.96.3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
--- Comment #1 from mar...@htw-saarland.de 2010-10-14 10:46:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 22034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22034
intermediate file of error producing source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
--- Comment #2 from mar...@htw-saarland.de 2010-10-14 10:46:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 22035
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22035
Makefile with compiler flags
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-14 10:53:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Reduced
>
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> std::vector b(4);
> b.push_back(1);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> There's no pretty printer for vector
see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46013
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-14
10:59:33 UTC ---
that preprocessed file refers to a precompiled header, student.h.gch, which
isn't included
can you reproduce it without using precompiled headers?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690
--- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-14 11:13:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 22036
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22036
my gcc build script.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-14 11:17:55
UTC ---
attached gcc build script builds libstdc++.a with dwarf3 debuginfo
which works with testcase compiled with dwarf3 or dwarf4.
if you change CUSTOM_FLAGS in build script to emit dwarf4 fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
11:54:13 UTC ---
The snippet seems to work as far as to set SUB_DISTANCE to chrec_dont_know,
together with the suggested fix in comment #5 it fixes this PR.
Now, the hunk below alone would already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
11:59:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 14 11:59:47 2010
New Revision: 165462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165462
Log:
2010-10-14 Richard Guenther
PR lto/445
...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: fo...@rmki.kfki.hu
/* test.c */
int f(int i)
{
static void* labs[2] =
{ &&lab1,
&&lab2
};
goto *(labs[i&1]);
lab1: return 1;
lab2: return 2;
return 0;
}
/* test.c end */
GCC 4.6.0 20101014 -Wall prints the followiung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
cc version 4.6.0 20101014 (experimental) (GCC)
configure:3004: $? = 0
configure:2993: /home/amit/build/gcc/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/amit/build/gcc/./gcc/
-B/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/home/amit/install/gcc/x86_64-unk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46017
Summary: Reject ALLOCATE(a, a%b) as "a%b" depends on the
allocation status of "a"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #33 from Loaden YC 2010-10-14 12:18:58
UTC ---
Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to upgrade
to 4.5.x.
Why this issue can not been confirmed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45984
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46016
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46016
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-14
13:51:36 UTC ---
The docs for --with-mpc do mention this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
15:09:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to upgrade
> to 4.5.x.
> Why this issue can not been confirmed?
The way I read it, this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45957
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46014
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@htw-saarland.de
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #35 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:24:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > Because of this issue, I have been using GCC4.4.x, but do not want to
> > upgrade
> > to 4.5.x.
> > Why this issue can not b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Summary: Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig
PR lto/45382
* g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/20101014-2_0.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i386-pc-solaris2.10
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #36 from Dave Korn 2010-10-14 15:37:34
UTC ---
Hi everyone, sorry I've been busy working on LTO stuff for a bit but I haven't
forgotten this.
Before this discussion gets too heated, could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
some of the obj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #37 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:42:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22037
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #38 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:44:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 22038
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22038
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22037|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #40 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
15:47:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
> some of the object files we've been discussing as attachments to this bug
> report, so that we can all take a close l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-10-14
15:48:59 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Oct 14 15:48:52 2010
New Revision: 165472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165472
Log:
PR c/45969
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #41 from Dave Korn 2010-10-14 15:50:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > could Vadim and/or Cesar please add
> > some of the object files we've been discussing as attachments to this bug
> > report, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44913
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-14
15:51:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 14 15:51:15 2010
New Revision: 165473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165473
Log:
2010-10-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44913
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-14 15:57:52
UTC ---
Please also show the full options passed to cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45343
xunxun1982 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #42 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:01:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 22040
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22040
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with g++ 3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #43 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:01:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 22041
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22041
appbase.cpp file from wxWidgets compiled with MSVC 9 (a.k.a. 2008)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22041|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #45 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
16:12:00 UTC ---
Here are the files.
Notice that about half of the size of the MSVC object file is taken by debug
information ("/Zi" option was used when compiling it) while all gcc versions
contain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
Stephen Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stephen.clarke at st dot
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:33 +, stephen.clarke at st dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
>
> Stephen Clarke changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Comment #9 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com 2010-10-14 16:39:26 UTC ---
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:33 +, stephen.clarke at st dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
>
> Stephen Clarke changed:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019
Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x2ULL << y)
miscompilation with 32-bit HWI
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Clarke 2010-10-14
17:01:47 UTC ---
OK, I can see that the ARM ARM states for Rm == PC then its unpredictable.
But for Rn == PC, I can only see that its unpredictable if W is 1
or P is 0 (I am looking at encoding A1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
Summary: Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1
character return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #46 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
17:09:05 UTC ---
Another data point after having a closer look at .drectve section in all of the
files: as previously noticed, 4.4 generates "-export" directives for 180
symbols while 4.5 generates th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #47 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
17:13:01 UTC ---
One should note that GCC's implementation of PCH is way different from MSVC's.
So comparing with PCH is not the correct thing to do really. PCH in GCC is
really preprocessed/sematic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-14
17:14:45 UTC ---
Thinking of it again, one probably needs also NAGs error message as:
FUNCTION F_X(A) bind(c,name='F_X')
CHARACTER*(*) F_X
END FUNCTION
...
interface
FUNCTION F_X(A) bind(c,name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #48 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-10-14
17:29:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> One should note that GCC's implementation of PCH is way different from
> MSVC's.
> So comparing with PCH is not the correct thing to do really.
I unders
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021
Summary: 3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46022
Summary: [4.6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-double-reduc-5.c
FAILs on Solaris 10/x86 with gas
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46023
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr43430-2.c FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #5 from Marco van Hulten 2010-10-14
18:15:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> [...]
> The issue is really the ".true." ("T","true", ".false.", "F", "false"). If the
> last item (in the namelist and in the derived type) is an integer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46024
Summary: g++.dg/warn/miss-format-1.C FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46025
Summary: [4.6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr38240.c FAILs on
Solaris 8 and 9/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2010-10-14 18:31:31
UTC ---
*** Bug 46025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46025
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45921
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #10 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026
Summary: [trans-mem] Unable to build libitm on Solaris/x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46027
Summary: (unsignedtype1)(unsignedtype2)(unsignedtype1_var) not
changed into unsignedtype1_var & NNN when
sizeof(type1) > sizeof(type2)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46027
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-14
18:59:58 UTC ---
The testing went fine, I just wanted to give more tought if some cheaper self
testing can be made instead of keeping clone info and then forgot about the
patch.
Will re-test and commit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-14
19:13:30 UTC ---
This one is on the top of my list. I usually take a few days to sort it out.
I already have a general idea what the problem is. I will use your added test
cases when I nail it. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46008
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-14
19:34:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 14 19:34:16 2010
New Revision: 165476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165476
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46008
* tree-if-conv.c
cal
--with-mpfr=/export/home/arth/local --enable-checking=release
--enable-threads=posix --with-gnu-as --with-as=/export/home/arth/local/bin/as
--with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/export/home/arth/local/bin/ld
--enable-libstdcxx-pch=no --enable-objc-gc --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10
Thread model: posix
gcc version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #4 from Art Haas 2010-10-14 20:13:45 UTC
---
Created attachment 22044
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22044
Pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' file
The pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' output has been sent and is compressed due
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45871
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45736
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45730
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-14
21:32:40 UTC ---
I fixed some additional problems in the area that may lead to undefined
symbols, so hope the PR is fixed for good and can be closed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers 2010-10-14
22:41:10 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Thu Oct 14 22:41:05 2010
New Revision: 165485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165485
Log:
PR c/45969
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45969
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-14 22:49:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 22045
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22045
reduced testcase from comment #1
Reduced from the original testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45730
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
Summary: Regression from GCC 4.4: "storage size of 'test_array'
isn't constant"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
23:21:53 UTC ---
16.0 is a floating point number which I think is causing the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46028
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-14
23:23:10 UTC ---
Comeau C/C++ gives the following error message for the above testcase:
"ComeauTest.c", line 5: error: expression must have integral type
<= 16.0)];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46030
Summary: registers trashed with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46029
Summary: -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores causes FAIL:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/pb_ds/example/tree_interval
s.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
