[Bug c++/45541] New: Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
Here is what I get, compilinb g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report. See for instructions. make[1]: *** [WebCore/bindings/js/libwebkitgtk_1_0_la-SerializedScriptValue.lo] Error 1 The command line: libtool: compile: g++ -DHA

[Bug c++/45541] Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 08:57 --- You probably ran out of memory and the kernel killed cc1plus. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45541

[Bug c++/45541] Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from viriketo at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 09:33 --- This is what I thought first. The computer has 1GB of RAM, 900MB free at the time of the build. After that failure, I added 500MiB of swap. I tried to build, and it halted in the same place with the same error. -- ht

[Bug bootstrap/45518] [4.6 regression] bootstrap failure on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

2010-09-05 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-09-05 10:07 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] bootstrap failure on > sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu > > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:38:34PM -, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote: > > Can you show us the co

[Bug tree-optimization/45535] [4.6 regression] ICE during tree_ssa_dse

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 10:47 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/45535] [4.6 regression] ICE during tree_ssa_dse

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 10:47 --- Subject: Bug 45535 Author: rguenth Date: Sun Sep 5 10:47:05 2010 New Revision: 163877 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163877 Log: 2010-09-05 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/

[Bug c++/45542] New: std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread vincenzo dot innocente at cern dot ch
on Linux 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 20 12:36:24 CET 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux gcc version 4.6.0 20100408 (experimental) (GCC) and GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) #include float sqr(float x) { return std::pow(x,2);} produces 0020 : 20: 0f

[Bug libgomp/43706] scheduling two threads on one core leads to starvation

2010-09-05 Thread solar-gcc at openwall dot com
--- Comment #22 from solar-gcc at openwall dot com 2010-09-05 11:37 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Maybe we could agree on a compromise for a start. Alexander, what are the > corresponding results for GOMP_SPINCOUNT=10? Unfortunately, I no longer have access to the dual-X5550 syst

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 11:43 --- I can't see any of those on x86_64-linux, neither with -m32 nor with -m64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-05 12:42 --- There is nothing to fix here, see: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#550 -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/45531] -fcompare-debug failure with -fvar-tracking-uninit, codegen differences

2010-09-05 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 13:02 --- Testing a patch to ignore debug insns in fixup_reorder_chain. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/45541] Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from viriketo at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 13:02 --- Yes OOM killed cc1plus, but maybe it is g++ taking far too much memory? [157723.444000] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x200da, order=0, oom_adj=0 [157723.444000] Call Trace: [157723.444000] [] dump_stack+0x8/0x40

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 13:08 --- > I can't see any of those on x86_64-linux, neither with -m32 nor with -m64. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00410.html . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread vincenzo dot innocente at cern dot ch
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo dot innocente at cern dot ch 2010-09-05 13:09 --- Subject: Re: std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x Ciao Paolo, On 5 Sep, 2010, at 2:42 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from paolo do

[Bug c++/45541] Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 13:43 --- Nobody can say without a testcase. So please attach preprocessed source. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45541

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 13:44 --- I also get the same ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 163836: [karma] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/gcc4.6w/bin/gcc -O3 /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/g

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 13:45 --- That doesn't help me to reproduce the issue. Please provide output of appending -v to the compiler command-line (this must be reproducable on x86_64 with appropriate flags). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 13:58 --- > Please provide output of appending -v to the compiler command-line The configure options [macbook] gcc/p_build% gfcp -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfcp COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/gcc4.6p/libexec/gcc/x86_6

[Bug testsuite/45543] New: [4.6 Regression] New test failures

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
On Linux/x86, revision 163868 gave FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/typedef1.C scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_enumeration_type 2 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr22152.c scan-assembler-times movq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%mm 1 Revision 163862 is OK. It may be caused by revision 163868: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc

[Bug testsuite/45543] [4.6 Regression] New test failures

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45543

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 14:01 --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Please provide output of appending -v to the compiler command-line > > The configure options > [macbook] gcc/p_build% gfcp -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gfcp > COLLECT_LTO_WR

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
ix=-4.6rh --with-libiconv-prefix=/usr --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,fortran CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20100905 (experimental) [trunk revision 163877] (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-mmacosx-version-min=10.5.8' '-B' '/GCC/gcc-4-6-regh

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 14:30 --- The ICEs appeared between 163800 (working) and 163820 (ICE). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug c++/45544] New: ICE: in sese_adjust_liveout_phis, at sese.c:633

2010-09-05 Thread shannemann at gmail dot com
Hi, Compiling libtorrent-0.12.6 using "-fgraphite-identity" ends up with an ICE. Disabling that flag "fixes" the problem. The bail-out message is at the bottom of this report. The same compilation with exactly the same flags performed on host/target/build triplet x86_64-pc-linux-gnu does not show

[Bug c++/45544] ICE: in sese_adjust_liveout_phis, at sese.c:633

2010-09-05 Thread shannemann at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from shannemann at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 14:52 --- Created an attachment (id=21702) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21702&action=view) the culprit source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45544

[Bug c++/45544] ICE: in sese_adjust_liveout_phis, at sese.c:633

2010-09-05 Thread shannemann at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from shannemann at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 14:54 --- Created an attachment (id=21703) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21703&action=view) sorry... the ii was too big, so it comes gzip'ed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45544

[Bug testsuite/45545] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #45266 +++ On Linux/x86-64, revision 163191 gave FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" 2 FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "memcpy|(ref-all.*ref

[Bug testsuite/45545] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 15:04 --- Subject: Bug 45545 Author: hp Date: Sun Sep 5 15:04:20 2010 New Revision: 163878 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163878 Log: PR testsuite/45545 * gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90: Co

[Bug c++/45544] ICE: in sese_adjust_liveout_phis, at sese.c:633

2010-09-05 Thread shannemann at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from shannemann at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 15:05 --- Created an attachment (id=21704) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21704&action=view) the previous ii file was not the right one. -- shannemann at gmail dot com changed: What|Remove

[Bug testsuite/45545] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 15:15 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg00394.html -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-05 15:36 --- The issue affects only mixed mode arithmetic (thus, functions taking at least two arguments), and in that case, as Howard explained, C++0x does what Fortran and C do. In any case, we are implementing correctly

[Bug c/45546] New: Incorrect Comments

2010-09-05 Thread mandeepgrang dot 1234 at gmail dot com
In gcc-4.6.0 cgraph.c: - /* Return local info for the compiled function. */ + /* Return global info for the compiled function. */ struct cgraph_global_info * cgraph_global_info (tree decl) { struct cgraph_node *node; gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL && cgraph_global_info_read

[Bug target/45547] New: [4.6 regression] Various DFP-related testsuite build failures due to missing symbols

2010-09-05 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
Between September 2nd http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00197.html and September 3rd http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00282

[Bug rtl-optimization/44919] ICE on ia64 with -O3 at sel-sched.c:4672

2010-09-05 Thread joachim dot reichel at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from joachim dot reichel at gmx dot de 2010-09-05 15:55 --- Any progress with the copyright assignment? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44919

[Bug target/45547] [4.6 regression] Various DFP-related testsuite build failures due to missing symbols

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 15:58 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45524 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/45524] r163815/r163816 produces new regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #35 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 15:58 --- *** Bug 45547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-05 16:15 --- By the way, if a function taking a single argument is passed and integer, the return type is double, not float or long double and one can see that the underlying mechanism is the same. All in all, I agreed with

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 16:15 --- The ICEs are due to revision 163802. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 16:26 --- Apparently this pr does not show up for i686-apple-darwin9 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00452.html ). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 16:28 --- The ICEs in comment #3 also show up for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00417.html ). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534

[Bug middle-end/45534] [4.6 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1031

2010-09-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 16:46 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Apparently this pr does not show up for i686-apple-darwin9 (see > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00452.html ). it does at m64 see c#7 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug c++/45548] New: Add with carry - missed optimization

2010-09-05 Thread tmartsum at gmail dot com
This is very related to this bug (43892): http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892 There are many ways to try to add with carry - and difficult to catch them all. I really 'tried to think like a compiler' when I wrote the following (C++ Intel 32bit code) code: (not even strict correctly c

[Bug fortran/45186] [4.6 Regression] Gfortran 4.5.0 emits wrong linenumbers

2010-09-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 18:10 --- Subject: Bug 45186 Author: burnus Date: Sun Sep 5 18:10:11 2010 New Revision: 163879 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163879 Log: 2010-09-05 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/45186

[Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data

2010-09-05 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 18:56 --- just a question. why is this illegal ? it takes 8 values to initialize... --bud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096

[Bug fortran/45532] gfortran namelist read error

2010-09-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 19:27 --- I will have a go at this. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread vincenzo dot innocente at cern dot ch
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo dot innocente at cern dot ch 2010-09-05 19:55 --- Subject: Re: std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x On 5 Sep, 2010, at 6:15 PM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > > > --- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at

[Bug libstdc++/45549] New: merge is_iterator into iterator_traits

2010-09-05 Thread marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org
Hello, after bug 40497, an is_iterator machinery was added to restrict the C++0x prototypes of std::next and std::prev. An alternative solution seems to be to use this same machinery in the definition of iterator_traits so that when a class T is not a pointer and does not provide iterator_categor

[Bug rtl-optimization/45454] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1614

2010-09-05 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 20:44 --- When I first tried to make sel-sched work with VTA, we didn't create dependencies of non-debug insns on debug insns. Now we do. Other schedulers know that these deps don't prevent insn movement, just signal the need

[Bug middle-end/45550] New: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
This happens when building current Wine sources with today's GCC: % /files/pfeifer/gcc/bin/gcc -c -O1 winefile.i winefile.c: In function 'is_exe_file': winefile.c:2953:13: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source i

[Bug c++/45541] Internal error (killed) building webkit svn 65398 (loongson2f)

2010-09-05 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from viriketo at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 21:09 --- Created an attachment (id=21705) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21705&action=view) Preprocessed source causing the trouble I attach the preprocessed file that triggers the problem. In this case, it e

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #1 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-09-05 21:10 --- Created an attachment (id=21706) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21706&action=view) Testcase Note: this has been introduced in the last four days or so from what I can see. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug target/45524] r163815/r163816 produces new regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-09-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #36 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-05 21:39 --- I confirm that the patch in comment #28 fixes this pr. However using the tip in comment #22, I get [macbook] gcc/p_build% grep -r decimal_ */config.log gcc/config.log:enable_decimal_float='dpd' libdecnumber/config.l

[Bug target/45548] Add with carry - missed optimization on x86

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 22:15 --- Confirmed. zero_extendsidi2_32 and adddi3_doubleword are being split too late. Which causes no optimizations to happen on those two things. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remove

[Bug libstdc++/45549] merge is_iterator into iterator_traits

2010-09-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-05 22:22 --- (In reply to comment #0) > An alternative solution seems to be to use this same machinery in the > definition of iterator_traits so that when a class T is not a pointer and does > not provide iterator_category

[Bug target/45524] r163815/r163816 produces new regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #37 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-05 22:27 --- (In reply to comment #36) > I confirm that the patch in comment #28 fixes this pr. However using the tip > in > comment #22, I get > > [macbook] gcc/p_build% grep -r decimal_ */config.log > gcc/config.log:enable_

[Bug c++/45542] std::pow(float) converts to double when compiled with -std=gnu++0x

2010-09-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-05 23:01 --- Ok... We can discuss these issues in better detail when we met. Well, remember that this is Free Software, thus, if you are unsure about a behavior, just open the header in an editor and look inside it: isn't o

[Bug fortran/45367] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 and gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 00:18 --- Fixed as of revision 163884. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/45504] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 00:19 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/45545] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45545

[Bug middle-end/45251] [4.6 Regression] Java testsuite regressions on hppa-linux

2010-09-05 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 00:46 --- These failures were introduced in revision 162943: Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 6 11:47:31 2010 New Revision: 162943 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162943 Log: 2010-08-06 Richard Guenther

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 01:28 --- It is caused by revision 163831: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00122.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC host tri

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 01:39 --- It is very odd. Revision 163831 shouldn't change anything. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45550

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 01:45 --- It is caused by revision 163861: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00152.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/45551] New: [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
With revision 163380 this test passed. >From revision 163383 and on, this test has failed as follows: Running /tmp/regressn1-383/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/execute.exp ... FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c execution, -O3 -fo

[Bug rtl-optimization/45551] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c

2010-09-05 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 02:02 --- Created an attachment (id=21707) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21707&action=view) Simplified gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c See the combine dump at e.g. -O2. I haven't disected the miscompilation

[Bug rtl-optimization/45551] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/990326-1.c

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/45552] New: [graphite] ICE in sese_loop_depth, at sese.h:172

2010-09-05 Thread tolkiendili at gmail dot com
This error happens while building xscreensaver 5.11 at gentoo, using gentoo's gcc 4.5.1: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -I. -I. -I./../../utils -I./.. -I../.. -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/inclu

[Bug tree-optimization/45552] [graphite] ICE in sese_loop_depth, at sese.h:172

2010-09-05 Thread tolkiendili at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from tolkiendili at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 04:36 --- Created an attachment (id=21708) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21708&action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45552

[Bug c++/45553] New: Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
Hi All, A way to suppress the warning generated from the following would be a welcome addition. A solution was proposed in [1], but I'd like a cleaner approach. I believe suppressing the warning for a template parameter is the cleanest way to dispose of the warning. template< class T > SomeClass:

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 05:24 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11856 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 05:24 --- *** Bug 45553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from noloader at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 05:35 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11856 *** > Thanks Andrew. For the record, I don't really consider it a bug - its closer to undesired behavior when working with generics/templ

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 05:39 --- It is still a dup of bug 11856. Note the use of bug here is really dealing with how do you describe all issues (enhancements or otherwise). The use is not saying it is a "software bug" in the normal sense. *** Thi

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #30 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 05:39 --- *** Bug 45553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856

[Bug fortran/38282] Add the remaining HPF bit intrinsics

2010-09-05 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 05:55 --- Subject: Bug 38282 Author: burnus Date: Mon Sep 6 05:55:10 2010 New Revision: 163898 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163898 Log: 2010-09-06 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/38282

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 06:33 --- In G++ 4.6+ you can do: int i; unsigned j; template void bar (const T& t) { #pragma GCC diagnostic push #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits" if (t < 0) #pragma GCC diagnostic pop { i++; } }

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from noloader at gmail dot com 2010-09-06 06:45 --- (In reply to comment #4) > In G++ 4.6+ you can do: > int i; > unsigned j; > > template > void > bar (const T& t) > { > #pragma GCC diagnostic push > #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits" > if (t < 0) > #pragm

[Bug c++/45553] Warning Suppression: C++ Templates, Unsigned, and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"

2010-09-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 06:48 --- >I thought Stallman hated those things The reason why Stallman hated them is that they did not work with macros and that changed with C99 adding support of _Pragma which can be used in macros now. So his argument