--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 07:25 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> INQUIRE_5.f90 lines 22, 26, and 28 use an EXIST variable which is not default
> LOGICAL. I believe this is not standard.
For completeness: Since F2008 it is allowed:
F95: R924 inquire-sp
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> I do not object to -Wpedantic.
Ah, ok! Then, I will start with this and worry about the other warnings when
their time comes. Thanks!
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #9 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2010-07-04 08:33 ---
Subject: Re: DECL_SAVED_TREE is always null on the first
FUNCTION_DECL and is not null on the others
On 4 July 2010 02:39, asmprog32 at hotmail dot com
wrote:
> A file has 3 functions (with body), the AST g
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 08:34 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> After the bug has been closed. i has posted the question to gcc-help, thanks
>
>
> ( i has reported as bug because , i has thinked it was a bug )
I personally think that if this is not
--- Comment #3 from paavo at osa dot pri dot ee 2010-07-04 08:59 ---
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but somehow was not able to find it in the bug
database search.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44801
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 09:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=21080)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21080&action=view)
proposed patch (causes unrelated breakage)
This patch causes a segfault in dynamic_dispatch_6.f03, although
the
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 09:20 ---
It seems the dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 is independent of this patch.
I'll submit this patch anyway.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44693
--- Comment #11 from asmprog32 at hotmail dot com 2010-07-04 09:39 ---
The problem is that i followed also external documentation, where
PLUGIN_OVERRIDE_GATE is used to analyse AST. GCC documentation say to use
PLUGIN_PRE_GENERICIZE and infact it work, so it is a my wrong.
--
http:/
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 10:14 ---
Subtle. pointer_map_insert invalidates slot pointers. I have a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44785
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-04 10:48 ---
> Note: The function "ddx" is not declared as PURE -
> and also cannot simply marked as pure as it host-associates the variables "I"
> and "J" - thus a simple check for no host association would not work.
There is no
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 10:53 ---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|A
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 10:53 ---
Subject: Bug 44656
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 4 10:52:43 2010
New Revision: 161798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161798
Log:
2010-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 11:48 ---
Mine.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 12:20 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 12:20 ---
Subject: Bug 44785
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 4 12:20:14 2010
New Revision: 161800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161800
Log:
2010-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/44785
The following code produces the error:
$ c++-c triangles_test.cpp -O9
triangles_test.cpp: In member function virtual Halfedge_handle
Ovl_visitor::insert_at_vertices():
triangles_test.cpp:12:24: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
var_decl, have result_decl in gimplify_modify_expr,
/abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/g++ -O2 qq.ii
In file included from ../../../netwerk/cache/nsDiskCacheMap.cpp:44:0:
../../../netwerk/cache/nsDiskCacheMap.h: In member function void
nsDiskCacheHeader::Swap():
../../../netwerk/cache/nsDiskCacheMap.h:362:28: internal compiler error: in
gimplify_expr, a
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 13:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=21081)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21081&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44809
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 13:27 ---
I can see on current trunk when dumping rtl-expand-alias that some of the
pointers
created by the vectorizer miss alias information, namely those in the
loop pre-header:
:
base_off.26_73 = prolog_loop_niters.16_27
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/test/gnu/
gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tortu
re/pr36745.C -nostdinc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v
3/include/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hpp
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:34 ---
Also seen on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:38 ---
Confirmed.
The value-expr is odd:
;; Function virtual Halfedge_handle Ovl_visitor::insert_at_vertices() (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
{
struct Halfedge_handle res [value-expr: ];
struct Halfedge_handle
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 44596
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 4 14:40:34 2010
New Revision: 161801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161801
Log:
2010-07-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44596
PR f
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 44745
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 4 14:40:34 2010
New Revision: 161801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161801
Log:
2010-07-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44596
PR fo
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:42 ---
Mine (mem-ref related). Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
template
uint64_t shift(uint64_t b) {
if (N > 0)
return b << N;
else
return b >> -N;
}
int main() {
int a = shift<-5>(0x100);
int b = shift<5>(0x100);
return a+b;
}
---
I am using this function template in a header, and other warnings and even
errors tend to ge
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 15:00 ---
I have analyzed this already. The problem is that
struct QMapData
{
QBasicAtomicInt ref;
static QMapData shared_null;
};
the static QMapData shared_null has DECL_ALIGN of 8 bits. So we end up passing
an unali
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 15:02 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 15:14 ---
Reduced testcase:
unsigned int mEvictionRank[(1 << 5)];
void Unswap(int i)
{
mEvictionRank[i] = ({ unsigned int __v = i; __v; });
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44809
On x86_64-apple-darwin* and i*86-apple-darwin*, a number of lto failures remain
at -m32 which are of the form...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/ c_lto_2008_0.o
c_lto_2008_1.o -O0 -fwhopr -m32 -o gcc-dg-lto-
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-04
15:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=21082)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21082&action=view)
assembly file 2008_0.s
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 15:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=21083)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21083&action=view)
patch
Patch I'm testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44809
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-04
15:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=21084)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21084&action=view)
assembly file 2008_1.s
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-04
15:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=21085)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21085&action=view)
assembly file gcc-dg-lto-2008-01.ltrans0.s
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 16:08 ---
Subject: Bug 44479
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 4 16:08:21 2010
New Revision: 161802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161802
Log:
2010-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 16:09 ---
Can you re-check now? I'm not good at reading scheduler dumps but at expansion
time it looks good to me even with IVOPTs turned on now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44479
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44479
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 16:55 ---
Subject: Bug 44809
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 4 16:55:40 2010
New Revision: 161803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161803
Log:
2010-07-04 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/44809
cc1plus -fpreprocessed nsTextFrameThebes.ii -dumpbase nsTextFrameThebes.cpp
-mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip nsTextFrameThebes.o -O2 -Os -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy
-Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-variadic-macros
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 17:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=21086)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21086&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44813
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 18:17 ---
Subject: Bug 16630
Author: manu
Date: Sun Jul 4 18:16:59 2010
New Revision: 161805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161805
Log:
2010-07-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c++/16630
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 18:19 ---
Testcase added. Closing as FIXED.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
$ cat ptr_bug.f90
module mod1
use iso_c_binding, only: C_ptr
end module mod1
module mod2
use mod1
use iso_c_binding, only: C_NULL_ptr
contains
subroutine bug
type(C_ptr) :: ptr
ptr=C_NULL_ptr
end subroutine bug
end module mod2
$ /usr/local/gfortran/bin/gfortran -c ptr_bug.f90
ptr
--- Comment #1 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2010-07-04 19:09 ---
I updated my code to use ISO_C_BINDING directly, but still get this bug. In
order to avoid corruption by the USEd module, the ISO_C_BINDING imports must
all be done on the first USE statement.
This code still fails:
mo
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 19:12 ---
I see the following similar fails on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11:
FAIL: 27_io/basic_stringbuf/sputbackc/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 27_io/basic_stringbuf/sputbackc/wchar_t/1.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 27
--- Comment #6 from roy dot 1rosen at gmail dot com 2010-07-04 19:32
---
Subject: Re: false dependencies are computed
after vectorization
Unfortunatelly I am OOO until the end of next week.
I would check it as soon as I get back.
Thanks, Roy.
2010/7/4, rguenth at gcc dot gn
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||37829
OtherBugsDependingO||32630
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-04 19:54 ---
Patch posted after successful (re)testing:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00331.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44626
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-04 20:10 ---
Also seen on {powerpc64,sparc64}-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44738
Found at [1].
Compiling Compiz Core with GCC 4.5 will cause a strange bug where static
members of template classes will have their constructors called on dlopen (),
causing key members such as plugin class reference counts to reset. This in
turn will causes crashes in the near future as key names
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-07-04 21:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=21087)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21087&action=view)
testcase
This is a simple testcase for this bug. With G++ 4.5 you will get auch output:
TestIndex constructor at 0xB
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 21:55 ---
dlHnd1 = dlopen("./libp1.so", RTLD_LAZY);
I think this is invalid as each get a private copy of the template class.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44815
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 21:56 ---
Really I think this is a violation of the One definition rule.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44815
[reg...@gamow tmp418]$ current-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=current-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/uusoc/exports/scratch/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r161681-install/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with:
--- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 22:07 ---
Subject: Bug 44531
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jul 4 22:07:29 2010
New Revision: 161807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161807
Log:
PR target/44531
* config.gcc (sh*-*-*): Use r
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 23:18 ---
Subject: Bug 44695
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jul 4 23:18:06 2010
New Revision: 161813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161813
Log:
Change 8bit divmod to HImode.
gcc/
2010-07-04 H.J. Lu
On Linux/x86-64, revision 161806 gave:
# /usr/bin/valgrind --tool=memcheck build/genautomata
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
insn-conditions.md > /dev/null
==5903== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==5903== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-05 00:05 ---
The code is
0260 :
260: 41 57 push %r15
262: 44 8b 1d 00 00 00 00mov0x0(%rip),%r11d# 269
269: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 00:11
---
>* Makefile.in (expmed.o-warn): Add -Wno-error.
There is no comment in Makefile.in why this is there, can you add one. Also is
this a false warning from gcc or a true one, I cannot tell.
Note I also get
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-05 00:20 ---
There is a 128byte red-zone. The code seems OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44817
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:14 ---
Related to PR 11856.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44811
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:18 ---
Neither.
rtems should be moved to the new style libgcc config and include
./config/rs6000/t-ppccomm .
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:21 ---
-ftrapv checks for one undefined behavior which is not mentioned in that list.
Why isn't that listed?
> # Shift operators where the amount shifted is greater or equal to the
promoted bit-width of the left-hand-sid
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:26 ---
Does not warn with:
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision 161476]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision
161476], GMP
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:28 ---
Note Fortran has this feature already:
-fmax-errors=Maximum number of errors to report
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44782
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:29 ---
Works on the trunk:
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision 161476]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision
161476], GMP
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=21088)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21088&action=view)
patch which needs testing
I have not tested this fix but it should work and should remove the
warning/error for
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:47 ---
Note I would keep GCC's wording as it is more correct with respect of C++.
Though I would say what the types are. This is true for any operator. The
reason is that the user could overridden the operator for those
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #6 from corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 03:30
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> rtems should be moved to the new style libgcc config and include
> ./config/rs6000/t-ppccomm .
Hmm. Doesn't RTEMS already do so?
>From config.gcc:
...
powerpc-*-rtems*)
tm_file
--- Comment #7 from corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 04:17
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > rtems should be moved to the new style libgcc config and include
> > ./config/rs6000/t-ppccomm .
>
> Hmm. Doesn't RTEMS already do so?
Did you mean libgcc/c
--- Comment #2 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 05:36 ---
Subject: Bug 22138
Author: pzhao
Date: Mon Jul 5 05:36:02 2010
New Revision: 161818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161818
Log:
gcc/cp/
2010-07-05 Shujing Zhao
PR c++/22138
--- Comment #3 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 06:13 ---
Fixed for trunk.
--
pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
75 matches
Mail list logo
