[Bug fortran/44360] wrong-code: host-associated procedure wrongly favoured to use-associated one

2010-06-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:06 --- Subject: Bug 44360 Author: burnus Date: Wed Jun 2 06:06:07 2010 New Revision: 160139 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160139 Log: 2010-06-02 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/44360 *

[Bug fortran/44360] wrong-code: host-associated procedure wrongly favoured to use-associated one

2010-06-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:06 --- Subject: Bug 44360 Author: burnus Date: Wed Jun 2 06:06:27 2010 New Revision: 160140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160140 Log: 2010-06-02 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/44360 *

[Bug fortran/44360] wrong-code: host-associated procedure wrongly favoured to use-associated one

2010-06-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:07 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.6) and the 4.4 and 4.5 branches. Thanks for the bug report! -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/43222] two DEBUG i => 0 generated after loop copy header

2010-06-01 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:28 --- Andrew, the debug stmts are indeed originally from the loop header's PHI nodes. Before ch we have: i_1 = ; # i => i_1 goto ; : i_3 = (i_2); # i => i_3 : i_2 = PHI ; # i => i_2 if () goto ; else goto ; copy_loop_he

[Bug debug/43119] debug info vs. scheduling

2010-06-01 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:43 --- My mid-term vision to address this sort of problem does not involve adding more debug bind insns (I don't quite see how to get them right), but rather emit a new kind of debug stmt/insn so as to emit is_stmt notes in

[Bug fortran/44353] rejects legal fortran

2010-06-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:44 --- The fix regtests fine. I will take the PR and apply the fix on friday, when I return from a trip. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/38468] Bad order of error messages for function call with wrong number of arguments

2010-06-01 Thread pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43126 *** -- pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/43126] "at this point in file" warnings are upside down

2010-06-01 Thread pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 06:53 --- *** Bug 38468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pzhao at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

<    1   2