--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-09 23:51
---
Grr, I noticed another typo in my reply, I meant of course "third find", not
"first find". Only the outcome of the third find was at issue, anyway.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43014
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-02-10 00:20
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.4.5
The main email-related functionality for GCC is: all bugs in the "gcc"
product automatically get CC:ed to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org (maybe other lists
depe
--- Comment #14 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-02-10 00:29 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Email replies get
> body and attachments automatically entered in the relevant bug, with an
> account created for the sender if they didn't already have one. If you
> preserve that, most
--- Comment #3 from davem at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 00:49 ---
I've root caused this to the Linux kernel not 16-byte aligning thread
stacks when using the clone() system call (it was enforcing only 8-byte
alignment), and also signal stacks.
The seconday mem TFmode stack slot was
--- Comment #12 from matt at use dot net 2010-02-10 01:26 ---
I haven't had any issues come up with this in the last month, testing with a
new profiledbootstrap of GCC trunk every week or so. Can this be backported to
4.4 now? Or is there some specific testing you'd like me to do? Let me
--- Comment #7 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 02:07
---
Subject: Bug 42973
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 10 02:07:22 2010
New Revision: 156641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156641
Log:
2010-02-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/4297
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-02-10 02:29
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.4.5
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, LpSolit at netscape dot net wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-02-10 00:29 ---
> (In reply to
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 03:31
---
Subject: Bug 42999
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Feb 10 03:31:02 2010
New Revision: 156642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156642
Log:
2010-02-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/42999
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 03:34
---
Subject: Bug 42999
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Feb 10 03:34:33 2010
New Revision: 156643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156643
Log:
2010-02-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/42999
--- Comment #5 from gcc_bugzilla dot 20 dot marcelitom at inboxclean dot
com 2010-02-10 04:00 ---
Thanks Andrew and Paolo, apologies for my mistake. I have learnt something.
According to what you wrote, a "seemingly natural" code like
for(;;) {
sElement = SomeString(...);
i
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 05:46 ---
Your comment to the patch that removed LANG_HOOKS_EXPR_SIZE suggests that this
isn't a problem anymore:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01593.html
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
