[Bug fortran/41627] mixing common and modules elicits seg fault

2009-10-07 Thread dh458 at oakapple dot net
--- Comment #1 from dh458 at oakapple dot net 2009-10-07 22:54 --- Created an attachment (id=18747) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18747&action=view) example file tor segmentation violation with gfortran 4.4.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41627

[Bug fortran/41627] mixing common and modules elicits seg fault

2009-10-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 23:21 --- Here's a reduced testcase. module testmod type variables_maille real, dimension(5) :: cell_var end type variables_maille type(variables_maille), pointer, dimension(:,:,:) :: hydro_vars common /arrays

[Bug fortran/41627] mixing common and modules elicits seg fault

2009-10-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-10-07 23:57 --- Confirmed for gfortran 4.3.4, 4.4.1, and trunk. The code compiles with gfortran 4.2.4, thus this is a regression. Reduced test: module testmod integer, parameter :: r8 = selected_real_kind(12) type VARIABLES_MA

[Bug fortran/41627] mixing common and modules elicits seg fault

2009-10-07 Thread dh458 at oakapple dot net
--- Comment #4 from dh458 at oakapple dot net 2009-10-08 00:19 --- Subject: Re: mixing common and modules elicits seg fault > Note that if I comment the line " common/arrays/Ro" I get the following link error: Undefined symbols: "_span.0", referenced from: _span.0$non_lazy_

[Bug c/41182] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145254 caused ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:5259

2009-10-07 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 00:33 --- Subject: Bug 41182 Author: jsm28 Date: Thu Oct 8 00:32:51 2009 New Revision: 152548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152548 Log: PR c/41182 * c-common.c (c_fully_fold_internal):

[Bug c/41182] [4.5 Regression] Revision 145254 caused ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:5259

2009-10-07 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 00:34 --- Fixed for 4.5. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSI

[Bug libstdc++/41628] New: _GLIBCXX_DEBUG feature: check for unstable iterators

2009-10-07 Thread roland at redhat dot com
I just had a bug whose issue was using stale unstable iterators after changing the container. It would be nice for _GLIBCXX_DEBUG to catch those. e.g., container object holds a "mutation count" and increments it on every call that is allowed to destabilize extant iterators in the API (even if it

[Bug bootstrap/41404] expr.c undefined reference while linking jc1

2009-10-07 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 03:28 --- Verified that java bootstraps fine at r.152512. Thank you Jakub :) -- davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/37177] [c++0x] ICE on decltype(rel_ops::operator>);

2009-10-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 03:54 --- The reduced testcase is indeed valid, this is DR 115: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#115 However, rel_ops::operator> is ill-formed, because it has no operands of class or enumeration typ

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc > gcc-4.2.x

2009-10-07 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #37 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 05:10 --- Subject: Bug 37739 Author: andreast Date: Thu Oct 8 05:09:54 2009 New Revision: 152550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152550 Log: 2009-10-08 Andreas Tobler PR bootstrap/37739

<    1   2