--- Comment #26 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-04
19:18 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Fixed with revision 151367.
>
Apparently, not since Iain was on r151409, however
it might be fixed after the patch from...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg00381.
--- Comment #44 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=18497)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18497&action=view)
gcc45-pr41241.patch
New version of the csa bugfix.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:32 ---
Subject: Bug 41262
Author: uros
Date: Fri Sep 4 19:32:04 2009
New Revision: 151439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151439
Log:
PR target/41262
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_does_
--- Comment #45 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:36
---
Subject: Bug 41241
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Sep 4 19:36:26 2009
New Revision: 151440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151440
Log:
2009-09-04 Vladimir Makarov
PR bootstrap/4124
--- Comment #27 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
2009-09-04 19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > Fixed with revision 151367.
this is true for powerpc-apple-darwin9 (which is the mentioned system in the
bug)
it is NOT fixed for powerpc-app
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 19:40 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
dgutson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dgutson at codesourcery dot |
|com |
AssignedTo
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:49 ---
PR41229 I mean.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|
--- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-04
19:52 ---
I would wait until none of the other major targets are reporting failures in
comparing stage2 and stage3 (hopefully later today). If it still fails, then
report it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #46 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:07
---
*** Bug 41247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:07 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41241 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:16
---
Putting the standards discussion aside, this test case actually uncovered a
real bug. In list_read.c, eat_line does nothing for internal units.
If the test had used a real file, the comment would have been skipp
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 20:19
---
A side note: there are several places where we should use eat_line but instead
we now have explicit loops. I will take a scan through and find those while I
am at it. Just code clean-up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 21:03 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> For a reference, this is the patch I am testing:
Yes, this patch fixes stdarg failures from [1] with preliminary test:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointe
This sequence makes no less than 2 calls memmoving 0 bytes:
vector content;
content.resize(12);
>From *0x0 no less!
On a 64 bit system, the effect is far less pronounced (25%), but on 32 bits,
this loop takes 2.3 seconds on a vanilla g++;
for(int n=0; n < 1000; ++n) {
vector c
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-09-04 22:37
---
Ok, let's do something about this, likely just add a check in __copy_move (and
__copy_move_b), as suggested.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 23:09
---
I will add this to my list.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC will not bootstrap after the expand from tuples checkin because the pointer
extension code is wrong. If you compile gcc.dg/20020517-1.c you can see the
problem. This test compiled and ran before but now core dumps. The difference
in the generated assembly code is:
< addp4 r14 = r12, r
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.5/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/example.c
-O0 -g -lm -o ./example.exe(timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/example.c: In function
'
fi
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.5/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/guality.c
-O0 -g -lm -o ./guality.exe(timeout = 300)
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/guality.c: In function
'
gu
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.5/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-2.c
-O3 -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -fwhole-program -combine -lm
-o ./matrix-2.exe(timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/matri
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-05
01:24 ---
First round of regression hunting shows that r146781 (4/25/09) passes the
libjava like gcc 4.4.1 but r148013 (5/31/09) shows the additional 120+ libjava
failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.4/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gcc-4.4/objdi
r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c -O
-
g3 -dA -S -o inline2.s(timeout = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-09-05
01:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c
scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6
Attached inline2.s.
Dave
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia do
--- Comment #47 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 05:33 ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> Created an attachment (id=18497)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18497&action=view) [edit]
> gcc45-pr41241.patch
>
> New version of the csa bugfix.
>
This patch along
--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 06:08 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I will start full bootstrap and regression test over night.
The patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on alphaev68-linux-gnu where
it fixes mentioned failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 06:48 ---
This test fails for all targets.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
