[Bug c++/41254] New: crashed compile Qt4 gui library

Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: cc1plus.exe Application Version: 0.0.0.0 Application Timestamp:4aa07218 Fault Module Name:cc1plus.exe Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 4aa07218 Exception Code: c

[Bug c++/41254] crashed compile Qt4 gui library

--- Comment #1 from t7 at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 07:04 --- Created an attachment (id=18485) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18485&action=view) Preprocessed test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41254

[Bug other/41255] New: [4.5 Regression] Release notes: Advice to use GDB later than 6.8

"[One] need[s] the upcoming GDB to debug GCC 4.5 compiled code anyway, because older GDBs mishandle DW_CFA_restore_state which is now used all around in .eh_frame, otherwise backtraces really don't work." [1] Thus one should document this in the GCC 4.5 release notes. GDB 7.0 will support this,

[Bug other/41255] [4.5 Regression] Release notes: Advice to use GDB later than 6.8

-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #19 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 08:36 --- this also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 at least at 151409 -- developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/41256] New: ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 in locator_location at cfglayout.c:517

Following testcase fails when dumping RTL debug files (-da): --cut here-- int e[1024]; int foo (void) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) e[i] = i; return 0; } --cut here-- gcc -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -da r.c : In function âfoo._loopfn.0â: :0:0: internal compiler error: vector V

[Bug middle-end/41257] New: [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

The following valid code snippet is rejected on trunk when compiled with "-O" (on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu): == struct A { virtual void foo(); virtual ~A(); int i; }; struct B : virtual A {}; struct C : B { virtual void foo(); }; void bar() { C().foo();

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41257

[Bug fortran/41219] libgfortran build warnings

--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 09:25 --- Subject: Bug 41219 Author: burnus Date: Fri Sep 4 09:25:00 2009 New Revision: 151417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151417 Log: 2009-09-04 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41219 *

[Bug fortran/41242] [4.5 Regression] procedure pointer rejected (related to user-defined assignment?)

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 09:47 --- Working: 2009-08-21-r150985.tar.gz Failing: 2009-09-03-r151367.tar.gz Daniel, I think it might be due to your TBP OPERATOR/ASSIGNMENT patch. While the program fails for: prc_id = "foobar" ! ASSIGNMENT(=) [but n

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:34 --- I guess that's ours. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/41255] [4.5 Regression] Release notes: Advice to use GDB later than 6.8

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:37 --- Alexandre, can you grok up a patch for changes.html mentioning VTA and the gdb version issue? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/41254] crashed compile Qt4 gui library

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:39 --- The preprocessed source is not useful as it contains references to the precompiled header. Please reproduce without the precompiled header. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41254

[Bug target/41252] [4.5 Regression] Var tracking by default breaks arm-none-eabi build of newlib

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Var tracking by default |[4.5 Regression] Var |breaks arm-none-eabi build |

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:40 --- Seems to work for me now. (three of three bootstraps succeeded) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug tree-optimization/41181] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error when using x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc to build ffmpeg ac3enc.c

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:41 --- *** Bug 41251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c/41251] mplayer compilation fail with gcc-trunk

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 10:41 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41181 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/41258] New: internal compiler error: in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/symbol.c:4575

Fun testcase: gfortran -c bug.f90 f951: internal compiler error: in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/symbol.c:4575 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. > cat bug.f90 TYPE qs_scf_env_type TYPE(precondit

[Bug debug/41259] New: [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

another testcase, now -O3 -g fails, might be a duplicate of PR41229: > gfortran -c -O3 -g bug.f90 bug.f90: In function ‘broyden_mixing_new’: bug.f90:14:0: error: expected an SSA_NAME object bug.f90:14:0: error: in statement # DEBUG istat => stat.0 bug.f90:14:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa

[Bug debug/41259] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

-- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41259

[Bug tree-optimization/41112] [4.5 regression] ACATS c43205b fails at -O2 (tree-sra)

--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:08 --- Subject: Bug 41112 Author: jamborm Date: Fri Sep 4 11:08:12 2009 New Revision: 151420 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151420 Log: 2009-09-04 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimization/411

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #20 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:09 --- As of r151416, there's one remaining comparison failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.11: gcc/c-common.o differs I'll attach the stage2 and stage3 object files. Rainer -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: W

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #21 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:10 --- Created an attachment (id=18486) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18486&action=view) stage2 sparc-sun-solaris2.11 object file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #22 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:10 --- Created an attachment (id=18487) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18487&action=view) stage3 sparc-sun-solaris2.11 object file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:23 --- We remove the alias target during applying the inline transform. And we fail to remove unreachable alias pairs there. We usually do that from cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes. Once again this shows that these on-th

[Bug java/41260] New: major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk

We have accumulated a large number of regressions in the libjava testsuite on the x86_64-apple-darwin10 target in current gcc trunk compared to gcc 4.4.1... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg00294.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-07/msg01866.html Currently we have 13

[Bug tree-optimization/41112] [4.5 regression] ACATS c43205b fails at -O2 (tree-sra)

--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:29 --- So this is hopefully fixed. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:43 --- Hm, we can't delete it either. As we are emitting more thunks that strictly necessary we need to mark their targets necessary properly. Emitting the tunks before analyzing the functions and finishing aliases works

[Bug java/41260] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-04 11:44 --- On i686-apple-darwin9 my latest regtest (r151159) shows: === libjava tests === Running target unix === libjava Summary for unix === # of expected passes2574 Running ta

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:51 --- > Seems to work for me now. (three of three bootstraps succeeded) Reconfirmed at revision 151417: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs Bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #24 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:54 --- Created an attachment (id=18488) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18488&action=view) stage2 object file on i586-linux -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:54 --- Created an attachment (id=18489) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18489&action=view) stripped stage3 object file on i586-linux -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-04 11:58 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > --- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:51 > --- > >

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #27 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 12:01 --- Created an attachment (id=18490) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18490&action=view) stage 2/3 object filles that are different These object files are different between stage2/3 on alpha-linux-gnu. -

[Bug debug/41259] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:02 --- I think it's a duplicate of the other similar one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41259

[Bug middle-end/41256] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 in locator_location at cfglayout.c:517

--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 12:10 --- CCing author. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #28 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:13 --- In #c21/#c22 there are code generation differences. Rainer, can you please build it using stage1 and stage2 compiler with -da -fdump-noaddr -fdump-unnumbered and find out in which pass they start to diverge? --

[Bug middle-end/39832] [4.4/4.5 Regression] program built by x86_64-pc-mingw32-g++ run crash, maybe for _Unwind_SjLj_Unregister or __dyn_tls_dtor

--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41184 *** -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/41184] wrong optimise code, epilogue code adjust wrong rsp before pop

--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:18 --- *** Bug 39832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41184

[Bug c/41261] New: ice with -O2 -fprofile-arcs when compiling Linux kernel

I just tried to compile Linux kernel version 2.6.31-rc8 with the gcc 4.5 mainline snapshot 20090903 and the compiler said arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c: In function 'machine_kexec': arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c:270:6: internal compiler error: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:8

[Bug c/41261] ice with -O2 -fprofile-arcs when compiling Linux kernel

--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-09-04 12:21 --- Created an attachment (id=18491) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18491&action=view) C source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41261

[Bug bootstrap/41237] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9 due to a revision between 151343 and 151349

--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-04 12:22 --- > The bootstrap completes normally now on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with r151394. Same here for r151388 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and r151393 on i686-apple-darwin9. Apparently Vladimir's commit at r151388 (thanks!-). So f

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #20 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-04 12:24 --- > this also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 at least at 151409 This should be fixed now (try r151388 or newer, see pr41237). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41224

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #29 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:31 --- In the cfgloopmanip.o case, it seems that in addition to stripping .eh_frame section we'd need to strip also .rel.eh_frame and .rela.eh_frame. Plus, there is a code generation difference between -g and -g0, apparently

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #30 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:50 --- Regarding Alpha, there seem to be code generation differences, at least in tree-vect-slp.o. Can you check e.g. if there are the code generation differences even when you compile it with stage1 in both cases, just onc

[Bug java/41260] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk

--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-04 12:50 --- Can you try testing x86_64-apple-darwin9 so I an focus on a regression hunt for x86_64-apple-darwin10? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41260

[Bug java/41260] major regressions in libjava testsuite between 4.4.1 and gcc trunk

--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-04 12:53 --- Dominique, Also if you are bothering to run the test suite on i686-apple-darwin9 periodically, you might as well shoot the results over to the gcc-testresults mailing list (since Apple has never set up

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #31 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:55 --- > Does it work if you revert > > 2009-09-03 Richard Guenther > > * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm): Remove check of > eh_personality_libfunc. > > ? No, it doesn't, same failure. --

[Bug c/41262] New: ICE compiling 09/03/09 snapshot of gcc on DEC Alpha

When I attempt to build the 09/03/09 snapshot of gcc on a DEC Alpha processor running Debian Linux 5.0 I get the following message: /home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20090903/g95/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20090903/g95/./gcc/ -B/home/mrichmon/irun/alpha-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/mrichmon/irun/a

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #32 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:02 --- Re: #c29, I've managed to reproduce myself with -march=i586 -mtune=i586, debugging csa pass now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #33 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:04 --- Created an attachment (id=18492) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18492&action=view) Preprocessed source of stage3 cfgloopmanip.o /home/eric/build/gcc/native32/./prev-gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed c

[Bug fortran/41258] internal compiler error: in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/symbol.c:4575

--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-04 13:11 --- 'reduced' testcase > cat test.f90 TYPE a TYPE(b), DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: c END TYPE TYPE(a), POINTER :: d CALL X(d%c%e) -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c/41262] ICE compiling 09/03/09 snapshot of gcc on DEC Alpha

--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 13:11 --- Index: config/alpha/alpha.c === --- config/alpha/alpha.c(revision 151367) +++ config/alpha/alpha.c(working copy) @@ -7664,7 +7664,7 @@ alpha_d

[Bug target/41262] ICE compiling 09/03/09 snapshot of gcc on DEC Alpha

--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 13:14 --- The patch will get you up to PR 41241. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/41263] New: gcc uses all available memory

=release Thread model: posix gcc version 4.5.0 20090904 (experimental) (GCC) -- Summary: gcc uses all available memory Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/41263] gcc uses all available memory

--- Comment #1 from jdemeyer at cage dot ugent dot be 2009-09-04 13:21 --- Created an attachment (id=18493) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18493&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41263

[Bug middle-end/41261] ice with -O2 -fprofile-arcs when compiling Linux kernel

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:23 --- extern void relocate_kernel(); void machine_kexec(void *control_page) { memcpy(control_page, relocate_kernel, 2048); } Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/40905] GCC creates invalid executable with auto-imported DLL and __attribute__((cold))

--- Comment #5 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:27 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > > Is it possible that it triggers the exception trying to write in > > text.unlikely > > which is READONLY? > > > > Exactly. This is a linker, not a co

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #34 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2009-09-04 13:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure > --- Comment #28 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:13 > --- > In #c21/#c22 there are code generation differences. Raine

[Bug middle-end/41264] New: [4.5 Regression] variable-tracking unbelievably slow

The testcase from PR12392 (I'll attach it again momentarily) now has at -O -g variable tracking : 469.04 (89%) usr 0.96 (41%) sys 470.21 (89%) wall 170235 kB (26%) ggc the worst-case out of several testcases that show significant compile-time increases with -O -g. See http://gcc.opensuse.

[Bug c/41265] New: Test program hang up or segmentation fault if compiled with -std=gnu99 -O2

I compile the following example code from configure tests of coreutils: #include #include #include #include int main () { if (setlocale (LC_ALL, "fr_FR") != NULL) { if (btowc (EOF) != WEOF) return 1; } return 0; } Compilation flags was -O2 -std=gnu99. Compiled program

[Bug middle-end/41264] [4.5 Regression] variable-tracking unbelievably slow

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:53 --- Created an attachment (id=18494) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18494&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41264

[Bug middle-end/41264] [4.5 Regression] variable-tracking unbelievably slow

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41264

[Bug middle-end/41264] [4.5 Regression] variable-tracking unbelievably slow

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 14:02 --- Memory usage doubles. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Key

[Bug c++/41266] New: Emit DW_TAG_template_parameter_pack and DW_TAG_formal_parameter_pack

The fix for PR 30161 adds support to generate template parameters debug info. It used a trick to emit debug info for template parameter paramater packs (in the context of variadic templates). It appeared that a DWARF proposal exists for template parameter packs at http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.ph

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #35 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 14:08 --- (In reply to comment #30) > Regarding Alpha, there seem to be code generation differences, at least in > tree-vect-slp.o. Can you check e.g. if there are the code generation > differences even when you compile it with st

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #36 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 14:17 --- Actual differences for alpha (very minor, only different registers actually): --- tree-vect-slp-stage2.s 2009-09-04 16:09:55.0 +0200 +++ tree-vect-slp-stage3.s 2009-09-04 16:10:04.0 +0200 @@ -52

[Bug fortran/41258] [4.4/4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/symbol.c:4575

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 14:30 --- That's a regression with regards to 4.3. There one get's the following error message. (I think the error messages would be clearer if they were reversed.) ahjf.f90:5.12: CALL X(d%c%e) 1 Error: Derived ty

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #37 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 14:31 --- Created an attachment (id=18495) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18495&action=view) pr41241.c Self-contained testcase for the i586 combine-stack-adj.c bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug target/39065] libiberty hashtab.c:hash_pointer() needs intptr_t

--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 14:33 --- Subject: Bug 39065 Author: hjl Date: Fri Sep 4 14:33:16 2009 New Revision: 151423 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151423 Log: 2009-09-04 Ozkan Sezer PR target/39065 * configur

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #38 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2009-09-04 15:25 --- Finally, I think I found what is the reason for all these bootstrap failures. I've changed code dealing with register preferences. Now regnfo::reg_pref is not null from the start and some passes (now it is regmove) us

[Bug rtl-optimization/20070] If-conversion can't match equivalent code, and cross-jumping only works for literal matches

--- Comment #29 from rahul at icerasemi dot com 2009-09-04 14:51 --- I am testing Steven's Crossjumping patch attached here. With CoreMark we see a 1% increase in performance when using Os. Other proprietary tests show ~0.5% decrease in code size. The path however does not fix PR30905.

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #39 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2009-09-04 16:05 --- Uros, Eric, Rainer, could somebody of you check the following patch works. I tried to reproduce the bug on several available to me machines since yesterday night and I failed. Index: ira.c ==

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #21 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 16:27 --- (In reply to comment #20) > > this also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 at least at 151409 > > This should be fixed now (try r151388 or newer, see pr41237). i686-apple-darwin9 appear to be fine.. (p

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #22 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-04 16:41 --- When you run ./config ..., you should see rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory checking for default BUILD_CONFIG... conftest.o.g0.stripped conftest.o.g.stripped differ: char 23, line 2 stripping off .eh_frame, then ret

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #40 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 16:56 --- (In reply to comment #39) > Uros, Eric, Rainer, could somebody of you check the following patch works. > I > tried to reproduce the bug on several available to me machines since yesterday > night and I failed. It

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #23 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-04 16:57 --- If you follow the recent posts for Bug bootstrap/41241, you will see that there is still some residual break even on i586 linux. I won't worry too much just yet. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #41 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 16:58 --- Created an attachment (id=18496) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18496&action=view) gcc45-pr41241.patch Untested fix for the cfgloopmanip.c issue. We have (mem (mem (sp + cst)) in the debug_insn,

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #24 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-04 17:00 --- (In reply to comment #22 & #23) > When you run ./config ..., you should see > > rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory > checking for default BUILD_CONFIG... conftest.o.g0.stripped > conftest.o.g.stripped

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #43 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-04 17:58 --- Vlad, your patch also fixes alpha. Bootstrap finished OK, I'm running testsuite now. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug tree-optimization/41101] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2419

--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 17:51 --- Testcase from PR41263: int func(int); int bug(int* x, int* y, int N) { int i; int* t; while (1) { for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { y[i] = func(x[i] - x[1]); if (y[i]) return i; } t=x; x=y

[Bug tree-optimization/41101] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2419

--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 17:50 --- *** Bug 41263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/41241] [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure

--- Comment #42 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2009-09-04 17:36 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] bootstrap comparison failure > --- Comment #39 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2009-09-04 16:05 --- > Uros, Eric, Rainer, could somebody of you check the following

[Bug tree-optimization/41101] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2419

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:15 --- Testcase with less IL: int func(int); void bug(int* x, int* y, unsigned long int N) { unsigned long int i; int* t; while (1) { for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { y[i] = func(x[i] - x[1]);

[Bug c/41263] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2507

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 17:50 --- Dup of PR41101. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41101 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/30791] Need to run may-alias early in IPA

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:23 --- Fixed in 4.5. We have alias information all the way through. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:56 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:59 --- Running the stdarg pass too early, before at least some DCE, means functions that don't really need stdarg set up, might set it up unnecessarily. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089

[Bug target/41252] [4.5 Regression] Var tracking by default breaks arm-none-eabi build of newlib

--- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:00 --- Subject: Bug 41252 Author: aoliva Date: Fri Sep 4 18:59:50 2009 New Revision: 151437 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151437 Log: PR target/41252 * config/arm/vfp.md (*cmpdf_split_vfp): Fix src

[Bug middle-end/41257] [4.5 Regression] Bogus error '*.LTHUNK0' aliased to undefined symbol '_ZN1CD1Ev'

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:54 --- Subject: Bug 41257 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Sep 4 18:54:01 2009 New Revision: 151431 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151431 Log: 2009-09-04 Richard Guenther PR middle-end/41257

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:01 --- For a reference, this is the patch I am testing: Index: gcc/passes.c === --- gcc/passes.c(revision 151421) +++ gcc/passes.c(working cop

[Bug target/41252] [4.5 Regression] Var tracking by default breaks arm-none-eabi build of newlib

--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:02 --- Fixed. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/41225] [4.5 Regression] VTA: internal compiler error: in vect_stmt_relevant_p, at tree-vect-stmts.c:150

--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:04 --- Subject: Bug 41225 Author: aoliva Date: Fri Sep 4 19:03:49 2009 New Revision: 151438 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151438 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/41225 * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_stmt_re

[Bug debug/41225] [4.5 Regression] VTA: internal compiler error: in vect_stmt_relevant_p, at tree-vect-stmts.c:150

--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:05 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:05 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Running the stdarg pass too early, before at least some DCE, means functions > that don't really need stdarg set up, might set it up unnecessarily. > The comment in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:45 --- At the moment I believe that I have basically reintroduced PR 30791 - except that the bug really does not provide the description of the problem which is instead in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01176

[Bug bootstrap/41224] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin9 at revision 151318

--- Comment #25 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:07 --- Fixed with revision 151367. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41224

[Bug bootstrap/41228] [4.5 regression] Solaris 10/x86 comparison failure after VTA merge

--- Comment #11 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:08 --- Fixed in revision 151367. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk

--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:10 --- This is fixed with revisions 151432 (regression on pr40753.c test) and 151434 (warnings in guality.h). -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >