--- Comment #3 from sipych at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 22:46 ---
Also present in gcc 4.4.0
--
sipych at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|
--- Comment #23 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 23:48
---
I opened a new bugzilla, 40482, for the Load-hit-store RA issue discussed in
comments 17-20 since that's a separate problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
--- Comment #34 from paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 22:52
---
Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes
in expmed.c
On 07/23/2009 02:37 PM, krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> In emit_store_flag the following code now invokes emit_store_flag_1 instead
--- Comment #36 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-07-23 23:01 ---
No, all patches were committed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40597
--- Comment #4 from sipych at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 00:00 ---
// More similar cases. Static members also may be accessed
#include
class A {
enum { value=1 }; // private
static const int ci=2;
static int fi() { return 3; }
};
template // bug appears only if B is a tem
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 00:42 ---
Subject: Bug 40429
Author: bje
Date: Fri Jul 24 00:41:54 2009
New Revision: 150037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150037
Log:
2009-06-13 Ryan Mansfield
PR lto/40429
* lto-wrap
--- Comment #35 from meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-07-23
23:00 ---
Subject: Re: Powerpc bootstrap is broken due to changes in expmed.c
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52:01PM -, paolo dot bonzini at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #34 from paolo dot bonzi
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 00:31 ---
Fixed.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 40727
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jul 24 00:28:43 2009
New Revision: 150036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150036
Log:
2009-07-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/40727
*
--- Comment #3 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 00:42 ---
I checked in Ryan's patch for him.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 01:52 ---
It works for me on RHEL 4 with gcc 4.4.1:
[...@gnu-14 tmp]$ cat foo.cc
#include
using namespace std;
void f(const char * filename)
{
ifstream is;
throw 2;
}
int main()
{
try {
f("v3");
} catch(int e) {
}
--- Comment #2 from carrot at google dot com 2009-07-24 02:11 ---
It seems HAVE_cc0 disabled for arm. What's the reason behind it?
A simple method is to add a peephole rule to handle it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40835
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 04:01 ---
Subject: Bug 40209
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jul 24 04:01:13 2009
New Revision: 150038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150038
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/40209
* loop-iv.c (iv_analysis_lo
Incorrect code is produced for the following source with the O2 option. In
particular, the assignment to the bitfield field2 is optimized out of the code
entirely and regImage is left all zero. Correct code is produced with the O1
option and (at least) with gcc version 4.3.2.
===
--- Comment #34 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-24 05:39 ---
Testing paul's latest patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-07/msg00202.html
on the latest all file CP2K (see also PR40005)
http://www.pci.uzh.ch/vandevondele/tmp/CP2K_2009-05-01.f90.gz
I get the following I
--- Comment #35 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-07-24 05:48 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> I won't be able to reduce this failure for the next 10 days or so.
as a PS, the multiple-file compilation of trunk cp2k goes fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40011
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:22 PM, "jim at bodwin dot us" > wrote:
Incorrect code is produced for the following source with the O2
option. In
particular, the assignment to the bitfield field2 is optimized out
of the code
entirely and regImage is left all zero. Correct cod
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 05:54 ---
Subject: Re: New: O2 optimizes out assignment to bitfield
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:22 PM, "jim at bodwin dot us" wrote:
> Incorrect code is produced for the following source with the O2
> option
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-07-24 06:25 ---
Please also add the testcase from Comment #1 to gcc testsuite.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40209
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 06:27 ---
A hint, please, about why the patch of comment #2 would be the correct fix. As
far as I can tell, loop-iv doesn't need the notes and shouldn't have to clean
up other passes' mess. This patch also introduces a pass or
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
