--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:16
---
> thank you for responses, but, when i've to do the 'rm -rf...' before start the
> make bootstrap, or when i got the bootstrap failure?
Once you hit the bootstrap failure. Btw, 'make bootstrap' is deprecated wi
--- Comment #23 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:27 ---
Subject: Bug 25509
Author: manu
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:27:32 2009
New Revision: 149458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149458
Log:
2009-07-10 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR 25509
PR
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:27 ---
Subject: Bug 40614
Author: manu
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:27:32 2009
New Revision: 149458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149458
Log:
2009-07-10 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR 25509
PR 4
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:29 ---
FIXED in GCC 4.5
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #24 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:29 ---
FIXED in GCC 4.5
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 08:17 ---
This is PR39214 in C++ copy of that stuff. Will test and commit as obvious.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 08:35 ---
Confirmed.
(gdb) up
#1 0x084bdc54 in gen_type_die_with_usage (type=0xb7d78ee0,
context_die=0xb7fde680, usage=DINFO_USAGE_DIR_USE)
at /home/richard/src/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:15117
15117 gcc_assert (
--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 09:45 ---
Does this still occur on trunk ?
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 09:44 ---
While this triggers only with -fvar-tracking, it is var-tracking related only
in that vt_find_locations calls pre_and_rev_post_order_compute. The real
problem is that there are 2 basic blocks (in my case 220 and 222)
gcc-4.3.4 miscompiles kernel-2.6.30 for sh4-linux.
Reproduce: sh-linux-gcc -O2 -m4a-nofpu -ml -fomit-frame-pointer -S balloc.i
attached code is compiled as follows.
ext3_get_group_desc:
mov.w .L10,r1
sts.l pr,@-r15
add r4,r1
mov.l @(28,r1),r2
mov.l
--- Comment #1 from sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp 2009-07-10 09:57
---
Created an attachment (id=18171)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18171&action=view)
preprocessed source
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40710
I just tried to compile the Linux kernel 2.6.30.1
with the gcc compiler version 4.5 snapshot 20090709.
The compiler said
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:5081:1: error: definition in block 50 does not
dominate use in block 51
for SSA_NAME: .MEM_541 in statement:
.MEM_482 = PHI <.MEM_480(40), .MEM_54
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:37 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> PR fortran/40472
> PR fortran/50520
> * simplify.c (gfc_simplify_spread): Fix the case that source=
> is a scalar.
Hey, Tobias are you fixing future P
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:39 ---
Likely a dup of PR40676.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisD
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 10:43 ---
Sorry, can't reproduce this.
extern void abort (void);
int
main (void)
{
int x, y = 0;
#pragma omp parallel for schedule(guided) reduction(+:y)
for (x = 3; x < 478; x += 2)
y++;
if (y != 238)
abort ()
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:45 ---
Subject: Bug 40496
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 11:45:40 2009
New Revision: 149469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149469
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #22 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:46 ---
For z a complex number: Patch for tan(z), sinh(z), cosh(z), tanh(z) - see at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-07/msg00071.html
Remark: atan(z), asin(z) and acos(z) are also missing besides a{sin,cos,tan}h.
Additi
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:48 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-07-10 11:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=18172)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18172&action=view)
gzipped C source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40711
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:50 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This is PR39214 in C++ copy of that stuff. Will test and commit as obvious.
>
Please, also add the testcase. Bonus points for factoring out the parts that
are shared between the C and C++ f
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 11:57 ---
Subject: Bug 40502
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 11:56:55 2009
New Revision: 149470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149470
Log:
PR c++/40502
* error.c (cp_print_error_function):
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 12:18
---
would be interesting to know what fixed this on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 12:19 ---
C++0x, not fixing on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 12:24 ---
After most of the PPC issues have been fixed by r149419, some leftover trouble:
The following two variants of comment #2 and comment #4 both fail with
internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-
This code causes SIGFAULT on Ubuntu 8.10:
#include
using namespace std;
int main()
{
locale loc(locale("C"), "en_US", locale::monetary);
use_facet >(loc).grouping();
return 0;
}
Tested both with native gcc and one builded from svn.
According to gdb, sigfault is caused by strlen whil
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 13:44 ---
I could reproduce on trunk.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ass
--- Comment #12 from heydowns at borg dot com 2009-07-10 14:41 ---
Trying to give some answers to Joseph's questions in comment 9.
The best documentation I found on what, exactly, the various object files do is
actually the man pages for the Sun Studio compilers and the OpenSolaris sour
class C {
C();
void f() {};
};
C::C() { f(); };
g++ -c -o cu-overlap.o cu-overlap.C -g -O0
readelf --debug-dump=Ranges cu-overlap.o
Contents of the .debug_ranges section:
Offset BeginEnd
0034
00
--- Comment #23 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 15:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=18173)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18173&action=view)
Test implementation in C for complex arc{tan,sin,cos}{,h}
> Fallback implementations via complex logarithm
Att
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 15:55
---
Subject: Bug 37561
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:55:04 2009
New Revision: 149484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149484
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainl
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 15:55 ---
Subject: Bug 36089
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:55:04 2009
New Revision: 149484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149484
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainlin
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 15:57 ---
Subject: Bug 37877
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:56:52 2009
New Revision: 149485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149485
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainlin
--- Comment #23 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:00
---
Subject: Bug 38934
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 16:00:13 2009
New Revision: 149486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149486
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainl
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:02 ---
Subject: Bug 40291
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 16:01:34 2009
New Revision: 149487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149487
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainlin
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:03 ---
Subject: Bug 40566
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 16:02:59 2009
New Revision: 149488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149488
Log:
2009-07-10 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainlin
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:03 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:03 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:04
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:04 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:05 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-10 16:18 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00602.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #24 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:17 ---
Regarding expressions with Inf with x being finite according to Mathematica 7:
ArcSin (+/-Inf,x) = (0, -/+Inf)
ArcSin (x,+/-Inf) = (0, +/-Inf)
ArcCos (+/-Inf,x) = (0, +/-Inf)
ArcCos (x,+/-Inf) = (0, -/+Inf)
ArcTan (+
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-10 16:30 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00603.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 16:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=18174)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18174&action=view)
gcc45-pr40643.patch
Inline minmaxloc patch.
Is this the behavior we want?
If NaNs aren't supported and array size
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 17:33 ---
I never accepted this to be a regression and now, when it is the only one, I
feel that it is time to register that :-) It will, of course, be dealt with
once I attack the array descriptor business. ice-on-invalid-cod
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=18175)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18175&action=view)
Results for the testcase with ifort, sunf95, NAG f95, openf95, g95
> Is this the behavior we want?
Good question
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 19:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=18176)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18176&action=view)
gcc45-pr40713.patch
Untested patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40713
This bug occurs on Sparc Linux and HP-PA Linux, but not i686 or x86_64. I
believe it is generic to big endian processors.
When I compile and run the program listed below I get the message:
At line 5 of file z.f90 (unit = 32, file = 'fort.32')
Fortran runtime error: Invalid argument
PROGRAM test
The SPU compiler does not work properly with precompiled headers.
$ cat pch.h
#include
$ cat test.cpp
vec_float4 add(vec_float4 a, vec_float4 b)
{
return spu_add(a, b);
}
$ /opt/cell/toolchain/bin/spu-g++ -O3 pch.h -o pch.h.gch
$ /opt/cell/toolchain/bin/spu-g++ -O3 -include pch.h -S te
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-10 21:14
---
By the way, sEgfault, not sIgfault.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-07-10 21:16 ---
Confirmed on (powerpc|i686)-apple-darwin9 with -m32 or -m64. It is a
regression: it works with 4.2.3, 4.3.3, 4.4.0, but not with 4.4.1 (revision
147910) nor with trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
GCC 4.5.0 20090709. (IIRC, there was no such ICE when compiling with 20090702.)
gcc -S -O1 -finline-small-functions -foptimize-sibling-calls -march=i686 bug.c
bug.c:12:1: internal compiler error: in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323
bug.c:
extern int baz(void),
--- Comment #1 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-07-10
21:30 ---
Maybe a duplicate of PR39886 / PR40364.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40716
GCC 4.5.0 20090709. (IIRC, there was no such ICE when compiling with 20090702.)
gcc -S -O1 -finline-small-functions -foptimize-sibling-calls -march=i686 bug.c
bug.c:12:1: internal compiler error: in purge_dead_edges, at cfgrtl.c:2323
bug.c:
extern int baz(void),
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 21:38 ---
This was fixed in 4.5.0 I think.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40715
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 21:43 ---
*** Bug 40717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40716
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 21:43 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40716 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 40502
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:31:34 2009
New Revision: 149499
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149499
Log:
PR c++/40502
* error.c (cp_print_error_function):
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-07-10 22:36 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] another null pointer in
remove_unreachable_regions
> 569 EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (i->aka, 0, n, bi)
> (gdb) p i->aka
> $1 = (bitmap) 0x0
oops, forgot about this issue. Testing
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 22:37 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 39079
Author: daney
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:49:52 2009
New Revision: 149500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149500
Log:
2009-07-10 David Daney
PR target/39079
* test
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 22:52 ---
Fixed by the patch.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 22:55 ---
This is the proposed patch for this bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01978.html
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #25 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 00:03 ---
Subject: Bug 33197
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jul 11 00:03:07 2009
New Revision: 149503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149503
Log:
2009-07-09 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/33197
The following program will fail.
gcc -S -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls bug.c
bug.c:
#define stdcall __attribute__((__stdcall__))
struct S {
void (stdcall *f)(struct S *);
int i;
};
void stdcall foo(struct S *s)
{
s->i++;
}
void stdcall bar
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 02:13
---
I will take this one on.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40699
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
PR tests
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40707
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
PR tests
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:11
---
Subject: Bug 40709
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Jul 11 06:10:49 2009
New Revision: 149508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149508
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR testsuite/40699
PR tests
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:31
---
Reverted the offending commit.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:32
---
Reverted the offending commit.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 06:44
---
"ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" writes:
> Unfortunately, the same thing happens when I invoke runtest manually in the
> 20090522 tree where the 64-bit tests still worked correctly.
Ah! Thanks, that expl
73 matches
Mail list logo
