--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 00:25 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Manuel, pardon the naive question: are we getting closer to fixing this? I'm
> asking because I saw patches about column numbers and wondered if that really
> means that very soon we'll be abl
--- Comment #7 from lennart dot borgman at gmail dot com 2009-07-03 00:35
---
I think I found an answer to my last question here:
http://www.mingw.org/wiki/IncludePathHOWTO
Now I only need to understand how to parse that output...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-03 00:38
---
I see, thanks Manuel for the feedback, I'll give it some thought.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
--- Comment #18 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-07-03 01:38
---
I wonder whether people reporting that this bug has not been fixed (at least
for C/C++) realize that the fix needs to be in the sources you are building.
It's not a fix that affects the installed compiler.
I've
The gcc C compiler doesn't seem to be following the traditional
"right-then-left" rule when compiling function pointer prototypes.
For example, gcc properly considers this to be a valid prototype:
int (*count)( demo_counter * self, int count_amt );
, but it does not seem to recognize that the fo
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 06:40 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please try with a newer version of gfortran. Literally, hundreds of
> bugs and changes have occurred since version 4.3.0 was released.
> I believe this bug is a duplicate of
> http://gcc.g
--- Comment #1 from raeburn at raeburn dot org 2009-07-03 06:45 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> , but it does not seem to recognize that the following is also a valid
> prototype:
>
> int count * ( demo_counter * self, int count_amt );
It isn't.
> Following the traditional "right-then-
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
