[Bug tree-optimization/36318] SRA pessimizes struct copies without -Os

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 08:30 --- Subject: Bug 36318 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 5 08:30:21 2009 New Revision: 148203 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148203 Log: 2009-06-05 Alexander Strange PR tree-optimization/

[Bug fortran/40349] New: compiler crash with -O3

When I compile the subroutine (pasted at the end of this report) with gfortran -c -ffree-form -O3 bug.f90 The compiler crashes with the output bug.f90: In function 'subbug': bug.f90:1: internal compiler error: in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1031 Please submit a full bug report, with pr

[Bug fortran/40349] compiler crash with -O3

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-05 09:54 --- Works on me on (powerpc|i686)-apple-darwin9 (10.5.7) on trunk, 4.4.0, 4.4.1, 4.3.3, and 4.2.3 with or without -m64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40349

[Bug bootstrap/40350] New: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure indwarf2out.c on i686-apple-darwin9

At revision 148201, bootstrapping failed on i686-apple-darwin9 at stage 2 with: /opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/./prev-gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/i686-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/i686-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/i686-apple-darwin9/lib/ -isystem /opt/gcc

[Bug c/40351] New: ice in generate_subtree_copies for Linux kernel build

I just tried to compile the recent Linux kernel 2.6.29.4 with the GNU gcc version 4.5 snapshot 20090604. The compiler said arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c:4182:1: internal compiler error: in generate_subtree_copies, at tree-sra.c:1702 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropr

[Bug c/40351] ice in generate_subtree_copies for Linux kernel build

--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-06-05 10:57 --- Created an attachment (id=17953) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17953&action=view) gzipped C source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40351

[Bug bootstrap/40350] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure indwarf2out.c on i686-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-05 11:22 --- Bootstrap fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 since revision 148191: NEW GCC build failure, h...@148191 on native and on i686-pc-linux-gnu: NEW GCC build failure, h...@148193 on native -- dominiq at lps dot ens

[Bug c/40352] New: ICE in dwarf2out_begin_epilogue, at dwarf2out.c:2738

When I attempt to compile gcc 4.5.0 on a Sun Ultra 10 under Debian Linux I get the following messages: In file included from /home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20090604/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c:59:0: /home/mrichmon/gcc-4.5-20090604/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c: In function GÇÿ__register_frame_ta

[Bug tree-optimization/40351] [4.5 Regression] ice in generate_subtree_copies for Linux kernel build

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 11:40 --- Reduced testcase, fails with -O. struct IO_APIC_route_entry { unsigned int vector : 8; unsigned int delivery_mode : 1; unsigned int mask : 1; unsigned int __reserved_2 : 15; unsigned int __reserv

[Bug tree-optimization/40351] [4.5 Regression] ice in generate_subtree_copies for Linux kernel build

--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 11:49 --- Mine. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/40350] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure indwarf2out.c on i686-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 12:11 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug bootstrap/40350] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure indwarf2out.c on i686-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 12:11 --- Subject: Bug 40350 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 5 12:10:44 2009 New Revision: 148206 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148206 Log: 2009-06-05 Richard Guenther PR bootstrap/40350

[Bug c/40353] New: [GCC-4.4.0] configure --with-sysroot needs header files, but it should not

Hello! I try to build a cross compiler with sysroot support- before I build one without sysroot support. To build without sysroot support I used the following configure options: --prefix="${CROSS_DIR}" --target="${BUILD_TARGET}" --with-cpu=405 --disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-multilib --

[Bug libstdc++/35569] [c++0x] std::bind result functor doesn't accept rvalues

--- Comment #8 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-05 12:48 --- I've got std::bind and friends working with rvalues, but bug 34022 means that ugly workarounds are needed to work with rvalues of scalar types. When Core DR 664 is ready and bug 34022 is fixed that won't be neces

[Bug fortran/40354] New: bug with procedure pointers and C interoperability

The following code fail with message: Error: Parameter 'sub1' to 'c_funloc' at (1) must be BIND(C) It works with g95 and with ifort code: use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding interface real function sub2(a,b) real,intent(in) :: a, b end function sub2 end interface proce

[Bug c/40339] gcc: error trying to exec 'as': execvp: No such file or directory

--- Comment #4 from dsandler at paychex dot com 2009-06-05 13:37 --- I'm running RHEL5 on an x86_64 box from HP. I believe gcc and as were preconfigured when the OS was installed on the box. In what other ways would I know if as was not properly installed? Do you have any tips on what

[Bug c/40339] gcc: error trying to exec 'as': execvp: No such file or directory

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 14:30 --- You haven't told us haw you have configured gcc, if it was a native build or cross, etc. If it is a native build, checking that /usr/bin/as exists is the first step. You can e.g. strace the gcc driver to find out where

[Bug debug/40352] [4.5 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_begin_epilogue, at dwarf2out.c:2738

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug debug/40352] [4.5 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_begin_epilogue, at dwarf2out.c:2738

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 14:43 --- Most likely related to PR 40347. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40352

[Bug c/40339] gcc: error trying to exec 'as': execvp: No such file or directory

--- Comment #6 from dsandler at paychex dot com 2009-06-05 14:59 --- (In reply to comment #5) > You haven't told us haw you have configured gcc, if it was a native build or > cross, etc. > If it is a native build, checking that /usr/bin/as exists is the first step. > You can e.g. strace

[Bug fortran/40354] bug with procedure pointers and C interoperability

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 15:12 --- Looks like a bug in ifort and g95. 15.1.2.4 C FUNLOC (X) Description. Returns the C address of the argument. Class. Inquiry function. Argument. X shall either be a procedure that is interoperable,

[Bug c++/40355] New: ICE in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:357

sources are from http://github.com/mangos/mangos/commits/master GIT git://github.com/mangos/mangos.git rev 7966 CXXFLAGS -mmmx -msse2 -march=pentium4 -mfpmath=sse -g0 -ftree-vectorize -floop-interchange -floop-block -floop-strip-mine -ftree-loop-distribution -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer ./../../../d

[Bug c++/40355] ICE in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:357

--- Comment #1 from fierevere at ya dot ru 2009-06-05 15:34 --- Created an attachment (id=17954) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17954&action=view) the failed file ../../../../dep/ACE_wrappers/ace/POSIX_Proactor.cpp:857: internal compiler error: in prop_phis, at tree

[Bug middle-end/40340] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Fortification warning no longer emitted in inlines

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 15:35 --- Subject: Bug 40340 Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 5 15:35:13 2009 New Revision: 148212 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148212 Log: PR middle-end/40340 * tree-ssa-live.c (remove_unu

[Bug middle-end/40317] verify_flow_info ICE with nested functions

--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 15:43 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/40351] [4.5 Regression] ice in generate_subtree_copies for Linux kernel build

--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 15:48 --- Created an attachment (id=17955) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17955&action=view) Fix This patch fixes this problem. I'll post it to the mailing list once I get to bootstrap it which may take

[Bug c/40339] gcc: error trying to exec 'as': execvp: No such file or directory

--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 15:52 --- Depends what command gives you that execvp: No such file or directory error. Do yum install strace strace -f -o /tmp/gcc.log /whatever/command/gave/the/error its arguments and look where it was looking for as before gi

[Bug target/30354] -Os doesn't optimize a/CONST even if it saves size.

--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:19 --- CC'ing honza as i386 maintainer -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/28632] VRP should understand bitwise OR and AND

--- Comment #16 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:27 --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Created an attachment (id=16113) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16113&action=view) [edit] > > Updated doubleint-based patch. DOES NOT PASS

[Bug c/40339] gcc: error trying to exec 'as': execvp: No such file or directory

--- Comment #8 from dsandler at paychex dot com 2009-06-05 16:32 --- I'll have the SA group here give that a try. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40339

[Bug middle-end/40340] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Fortification warning no longer emitted in inlines

--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 40340 Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 5 16:31:44 2009 New Revision: 148214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148214 Log: PR middle-end/40340 * tree-ssa-live.c (remove_unu

[Bug middle-end/40340] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Fortification warning no longer emitted in inlines

--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 40340 Author: jakub Date: Fri Jun 5 16:32:21 2009 New Revision: 148215 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148215 Log: Fix up ChangeLog entries for PR middle-end/40340 Modifie

[Bug middle-end/40340] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Fortification warning no longer emitted in inlines

--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:34 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/40354] bug with procedure pointers and C interoperability

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:44 --- Fortran bugs never have a severity of Blocker unless the bug breaks bootstrapping gcc. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/40354] bug with procedure pointers and C interoperability

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:48 --- To get the code to compile, one can change external sub1 to real(c_float), external, bind(c) :: sub1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40354

[Bug fortran/40354] bug with procedure pointers and C interoperability

--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 16:53 --- (In reply to comment #3) > To get the code to compile, one can change > > external sub1 > > to >real(c_float), external, bind(c) :: sub1 > Forgot to add the necessary changes for sub1. function sub1(a,b) bi

[Bug testsuite/32837] FAIL: gcc.dg/pragma-darwin.c

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-05 16:59 --- The errors have disappeared between revisions 127060 and 127073. Closing as fixed. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/40356] New: "incompatible pointer type" warnings don't mention the actual types

For instance: ../../gdb/solib-svr4.c: In function ‘exec_pie_relocate’: ../../gdb/solib-svr4.c:900: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘build_section_table’ from incompatible pointer type ../../gdb/solib-svr4.c:900: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘build_section_table’ from incompatible pointer type It

[Bug c/40356] "incompatible pointer type" warnings don't mention the actual types

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 17:32 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30949 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/30949] "incompatible pointer type" warning does not point to declaration

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 17:32 --- *** Bug 40356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/40357] New: compiler hang for C++ code

I just tried to compile the Suse Factory package xalan-c-1.10.0-1.3 with the GNU gcc version 4.5 snapshot 20090604. The compiler hung for over 15 minutes on an idle machine. Preprocessed source code attached. No flags required. Compilation using gcc 4.3.2 takes seconds. -- Summary:

[Bug c++/40357] compiler hang for C++ code

--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-06-05 18:28 --- Created an attachment (id=17956) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17956&action=view) C++source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40357

[Bug bootstrap/40347] [4.5 Regression] i386-darwin ICEs while building libgcc during stage2

--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 19:51 --- Laurent, I don't seem to be able to reproduce your PA problem from a cross-compile. Please attach a preprocessed file that exhibits the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40347

[Bug bootstrap/40347] [4.5 Regression] i386-darwin ICEs while building libgcc during stage2

--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 20:04 --- Likewise, Andrew, I'll need a preprocessed file. Assuming something that doesn't show up w/ stage1 can even be reproduced via cross-compiler. Failing that, give me as much information as you can about how the CFA varia

[Bug fortran/40358] New: nternal error: Segmentation Fault (program f951) on Solaris.

The following bit of code generates an internal compiler error on a Sun T5240. Using the *exact* same binary on a Sun Blade 2000, no internal error is generated. kir...@t2:~$ gfortran secondtst.f gfortran: Internal error: Segmentation Fault (program f951) Please submit a full bug report. See

[Bug fortran/40358] nternal error: Segmentation Fault (program f951) on Solaris.

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-05 21:45 --- Works for me on i686-apple-darwin9 if I remove the lines: REAL SECOND EXTERNAL SECOND since SECOND is a gfortran intrinsic. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:

[Bug fortran/40358] nternal error: Segmentation Fault (program f951) on Solaris.

--- Comment #2 from david dot kirkby at onetel dot net 2009-06-05 22:10 --- Thanks. On closer inspection, it appears compilation, which was performed on one SPARC and moved to another is broken quite seriously. Ignore this bug report. dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug bootstrap/40338] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap comparision fails on 32 bit PA when comparing libgcc objects

--- Comment #11 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-06-05 22:30 --- Getting back to what is actually causing the failure on HPPA, there seem to be 2 problems. One is the random seed used by get_file_function_name. If I workaround that by using -frandom-seed="make-it-work" I still get a

[Bug fortran/40358] nternal error: Segmentation Fault (program f951) on Solaris.

--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 22:58 --- Not a bug in gfortran. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/34849] Missed autoincrement opportunities due to a different basic block structure.

--- Comment #12 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 23:16 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Ramana, can you please add the exact command line you are using (so that I can > see what flags you use and what cpu you target) and the exact output you are > expecting? I have hacked th