--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-04-22 08:05 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> % gcc-snapshot -funsigned-bitfields testsuite/gcc.dg/bitfld-3.c
> % ./a.out
> Abort
Confirmed with gcc-4.3-20090419 on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
W
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 39735
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 22 09:05:58 2009
New Revision: 146554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146554
Log:
2009-04-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39735
* decl
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:12 ---
If hppa-linux has long double the same as double (which raises the question why
it hasn't switched over to 128-bit long double together with
powerpc*/sparc*/s390*/alpha back in 2006), then __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:24 ---
Fixed with r146554. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |middle-end
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4
ht
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 10:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=17670)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17670&action=view)
preprocessed testcase
testcase for i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39845
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 10:16 ---
Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38934
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 10:27 ---
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:39 ---
Implement re-materialization in reload.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:36 ---
The problem with different instruction sets in different BBs is also how to
avoid code motion across them. IMNSHO this is a bad idea.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-04-22
11:20 ---
Hi Rob,
I just ran into this on i686-pc-cygwin. I think the reason you see it on
some builds and not others is because of the "--enable-libgcj-debug" option;
presumably that makes the asserts disapp
--- Comment #6 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-04-22
11:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=17671)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17671&action=view)
Fix debug asserts.
Adjust the assert to test the casted pointer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #7 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-04-22
11:24 ---
That gets me about three files further through the build, then there's another
failure:
In file included from
/gnu/gcc/gcc/libjava/gnu/classpath/natConfiguration.cc:17:
/gnu/gcc/gcc/libjava/gnu/classpath
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 11:30 ---
Subject: Bug 39845
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 22 11:30:04 2009
New Revision: 146569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146569
Log:
2009-04-22 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 11:32 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from andreas_gajda at web dot de 2009-04-22 11:34 ---
Does this mean the target "arm-none-uclinux" is unsupported?
I checked again, using (binutils-2.17 and) gcc-4.3.3 from mirror site
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/gcc/releases/gcc-4.3.3/gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2
Configuration was:
--- Comment #8 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-04-22
11:34 ---
Yep. From the .ii file:
class gnu::classpath::Configuration : public ::java::lang::Object
{
Configuration();
static ::java::lang::String * classpath_home();
static jboolean debug();
static :
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:24 ---
Fixed. error-recovery bugs are not worth fixing on the release branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:25 ---
Does it work with 4.4? Andrew, can you confirm this bug?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:26
---
Fortran. P4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:29
---
This is worth fixing for 4.3.4. I am testing a backport.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39560
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.3 Regression] compiling |[4.3 Regression] c
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:32 ---
Backporting to 4.4 and 4.3 sounds fine (note that backports for regressions do
not require extra approval, though of course the usual testing is required).
Fortran, P4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39786
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:35 ---
Fortran, P4. Confirmed as of comment #1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39799
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:39 ---
Vlad, with YARA you had implemented rematerialization, right? How difficult is
it to do the same with IRA for cases like this?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39794
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|4.4.1 |4.3.4
http://gcc
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-22
13:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++
not exported anymore
> --- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:12
> ---
> If hppa-linux has l
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39579
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39580
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39824
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:47 ---
Fixed!
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Using more than 15 operands in inline assembly of the symbolic form:
"... lots of assembly elided ..." \
"movaps %[inner_filter_index], %[icoeff_l2]\n\t" \
:[icoeff_l2] "+x" (icoeff_l2),\
[inner_filter_index] "+x" (inner_filter_
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39834
--- Comment #1 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 13:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=17672)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17672&action=view)
Test program demonstrating 16 register breakage on inline asm in x86_64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
Hi,
trying to build gcc-4.4.0 breaks on AIX-5.3 (4.3.3 build worked fine with same
setup),
the small patch below works around the AIX limitations:
/usr/local/bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link
/scr/os-aix53/koenig/gcc-4.4.0-1/ARENA/32/./gcc/xgcc ...
libtool: link: /scr/os-a
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 13:52 ---
Mine. CCP does sth weird.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39837
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-22 13:58 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The problem with different instruction sets in different BBs is also how to
> avoid code motion across them. IMNSHO this is a bad idea.
>
I agree. There are too many issues with it. I'd
--- Comment #2 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 14:04 ---
tested against: gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu12) 4.3.2 - fails
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:12 ---
This is latent on the 4.4 branch. I have a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39824
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:14 ---
Subject: Bug 39829
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 22 14:14:08 2009
New Revision: 146579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146579
Log:
2009-04-22 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:14 ---
Subject: Bug 39845
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 22 14:14:08 2009
New Revision: 146579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146579
Log:
2009-04-22 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
t/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.5.0/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include -c -g -O2 -W -Wall
-gnat
pg g-socket.adb -o g-socket.o
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.5.0 20090422 (experimental) [trunk revision 146542] (hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11)
GCC error:|
| in
--- Comment #6 from breiten at lexmark dot com 2009-04-22 14:29 ---
I have not made the time to produce a 4.4 powerpc cross compiler. The 4.4
native
i686 is fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38886
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:30 ---
"+x" counts as 2 operands, not just one (one input and one output).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:34 ---
Well, double double is IMHO really very problematic format, but only powerpc*
switched to it. alpha, s390* and sparc* use standard IEEE quad long double.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
I've tried to build the shiny new 4.4, but it seems the stage1 compiler has
hiccuped here:
/localdata/install/gcc/objdir-gcc-4.4.0/./gcc/xgcc
-B/localdata/install/gcc/objdir-gcc-4.4.0/./gcc/
-B/localdata/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/localdata/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/
-isystem /localdata/i686-pc-linux-g
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:56 ---
In the odd event that Richi didn't actively test the patch for cris-elf, I can
confirm that the issue is fixed for the original FAIL too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39845
Issue came up when testing/rewiewing proc pointers, cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-04/msg00214.html
The following program is believed to be correct and it runs with g95, NAG f95,
sunf95, openf95, and ifort, but not with gfortran:
Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument 'a'
real function f
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:00 ---
Actually no, it would be better if you moved over to using the intrincs which
can be optimized and scheduled.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-04-22
15:02 ---
Nevermind the typo in configure, it also segfaults with properly spelled
"--with-gmp=" instead of "--with-gp=".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
--- Comment #4 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 14:58 ---
"+" counts as two operands? ok, that makes sense. So, basically
2*num_of_physical_regs would be a saner default ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39847
Even though -march=nocona enables SSE2 and SSE3 extensions, gcc -Q
--help=target does not list them as enabled. This may be confusing to the user
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-04/msg00293.html ):
$ gcc -Q --help=target -march=nocona | grep msse[23]
-msse2
--- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:10
---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-04-22 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE: in make_decl_rtl,
at varasm.c:1304
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:56 ---
> In the odd ev
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.3.3
Priority|P4 |P2
http://gcc
--- Comment #69 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:15
---
I am going to do a backport of this to the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:08
---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:16 ---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:17 ---
Still worth backporting.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37219
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:10
---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:19
---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:21 ---
WONTFIX on the 4.3 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:23
---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:23 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:23 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:24 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:24 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:25 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:25 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:25 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:26 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:26 ---
Subject: Bug 39580
Author: abel
Date: Wed Apr 22 15:25:58 2009
New Revision: 146588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146588
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/39580
* sel-sched-ir.c (insert_in_hist
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:26 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:27 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:27 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:27
---
Caused by
2009-04-21 Martin Jambor
* tree-switch-conversion.c (build_constructors): Split a long line.
(constructor_contains_same_values_p): New function.
(build_one_array): Create ass
--- Comment #6 from abel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:28 ---
Fixed by the above patch.
--
abel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:28 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:28 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:29 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:02
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:30
---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:02
---
Subject: Bug 39496
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 22 15:01:45 2009
New Revision: 146583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146583
Log:
2009-04-22 Richard Guenther
Backport from mainl
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:30
---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:31 ---
WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
Hi,
Sorry for the lack of testing and specificity, but this should be fairly easy
to reproduce. Another user on Freenode's #gcc reported the same problem, so I
don't think it's just my setup. #gcc suggested I use a static gdb for
debugging, but for now I will link to some ltrace and strace dumps.
--- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:32 ---
Subject: Bug 14875
Author: manu
Date: Wed Apr 22 15:32:18 2009
New Revision: 146589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146589
Log:
2009-04-22 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez
PR c++/14875
*
--- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:33 ---
FIXED in GCC 4.5.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from d at teklibre dot com 2009-04-22 15:40 ---
Pinska: Actually, no. I started with the intrinsics and looked hard at what the
code scheduler was doing before settling on rewriting this in inline assembly.
The intrinsics have several problems that effect the code qualit
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 15:42 ---
Subject: Bug 39824
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 22 15:41:48 2009
New Revision: 146592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146592
Log:
2009-04-22 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
> gcc -c -O1 foo.c
foo.c: In function 'foo':
foo.c:33: internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1304
NOTES:
(1) gcc -c -O0 foo.c works
>
uname -a
Linux yoda.intec.dom 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
