--- Comment #2 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 21:08 ---
Here is the testcase simplified with delta. It's reproducible even with a
mipsisa64r2-elfobai compiler with -O1.
I don't think the bug is MIPS-specific. Inside expand_shift, amount which is:
(int) VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
--- Comment #6 from thomas dot jourdan at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 21:11
---
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for answering so quickly.
I am using crosstool-ng
(http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/dokuwiki/projects/crosstool) scripts to build my
cross tool chain. It works greats (with the same gc
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-13 21:13 ---
> I intend to change this, conditional on perhaps -ffast-math and/or -pedantic,
I don't understand the "and/or": -ffast-math and -pedantic at the same time
does not make any sense for me, -ffast-math allows some slo
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-01-13 21:30 ---
Subject: Re: Diagnose and treat (-2.0)**2.0 properly
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:13:57PM -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Request For Enhancement
The page: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html does provide a few tips about
making a profiled bootstrap but I've found little info for coverage testing.
One would think that you could enable it in the ./configure script and type
make (Shhh: Andrew lets out that it won'
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 21:41 ---
> Add a runtime check that x in x**y is not < 0
I'm actually against a run time check which is based on -std=, -pedantic, -W*
or similar compile time diagnostic flags. I regard such trickery behind the
scenes as ev
Thanks for the clarification, I managed to reproduce the fail. The
problem comes from the fact that we do not generate code for a scalar
reduction that is not detected as a scalar reduction with the variable
connection$dim$1$lbound.
In the attached output from debug_loops (3) I selected the regio
--- Comment #30 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2009-01-13 21:57 ---
Subject: Re: [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)
Thanks for the clarification, I managed to reproduce the fail. The
problem comes from the fact that we do not generate code for a scalar
reduction that is not det
--- Comment #11 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-13 22:10 ---
ping
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31886
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 22:36 ---
Subject: Bug 38774
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 13 22:36:06 2009
New Revision: 143355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143355
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/38774
* combine.c (simplify_s
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 22:38 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 22:41
---
Fixed for GCC 4.4 (with unit-at-a-time being always on).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 22:49 ---
i?86 expands it to
(insn 39 38 40 t.i:39 (set (reg:SI 85)
(subreg:SI (reg:SF 65 [ D.1268 ]) 0)) -1 (nil))
(insn 40 39 41 t.i:39 (set (reg:QI 84)
(subreg:QI (reg:SI 85) 0)) -1 (nil))
(insn 41 40 42
--- Comment #15 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2009-01-13 23:13 ---
I suspect this needs to be solved in gcc.c with the specs handling, and you
probably need something to quote the white space in filename, so that it
doesn't break the file into separate arguments. Only some alpha and
--- Comment #3 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 00:10
---
I'm sorry I didn't catch the original "bug". I did search but missed the
obvious reference.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38830
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 00:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38809
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 14 00:35:32 2009
New Revision: 143360
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143360
Log:
2009-01-13 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #22 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-01-14
01:23 ---
Jerry,
The patch you committed solves the problems exposed with the xtarget.inp
xplor testcase. There are a large number of other failures with and without
this patch that are unrelated. I will try to
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 01:52
---
The current patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00675.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 03:02 ---
#4 0x00b7dd92 in walk_dominator_tree (walk_data=0xb73c, bb=0x43e05d00) at
/Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/domwalk.c:208
#5 0x005c536e in mark_def_site_blocks (interesting_blocks=0x4390df40) at
/Users/apinski/s
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 03:04 ---
error_handlerD.1503_1 = error_stopD.1495;
Totally wrong, error_handler is a global data from what I can tell. So this is
still a front-end issue and not a middle-end issue.
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot
--- Comment #23 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 03:05
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|AS
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 03:30
---
I propose that we close this as WONT FIX as well, for three reasons:
1) There are other ways to do these things and it is not necessary to use
internal I/O to do it. Character strings can be used for format str
--- Comment #7 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-14 03:35
---
Subject: Bug 38811
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Jan 14 03:35:35 2009
New Revision: 143362
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143362
Log:
2009-01-13 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/38811
--- Comment #32 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-14 06:49 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Subject: Re: [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)
>
> Thanks for the clarification, I managed to reproduce the fail. The
> problem comes from the fact that we do not generate code f
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
