[Bug libgcj/38396] [4.3 Regression] ecj1 linked against both -lgcj and -lgcj_bc

2009-01-11 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #23 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-11 08:30 --- r143261 is needed for the backport as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396

[Bug debug/7055] [alpha osf4] G++ 3.1 Produced bad debugging entries if compiled with -gcoff, also segv.

2009-01-11 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 10:57 --- Subject: Bug 7055 Author: uros Date: Sun Jan 11 10:56:52 2009 New Revision: 143265 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143265 Log: PR debug/7055 * gcc/mips-tfile.c (parse_def): Fix p

[Bug debug/7055] [alpha osf4] G++ 3.1 Produced bad debugging entries if compiled with -gcoff, also segv.

2009-01-11 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 10:58 --- Subject: Bug 7055 Author: uros Date: Sun Jan 11 10:58:01 2009 New Revision: 143266 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143266 Log: PR debug/7055 * gcc/mips-tfile.c (parse_def): Fix p

[Bug debug/7055] [alpha osf4] G++ 3.1 Produced bad debugging entries if compiled with -gcoff, also segv.

2009-01-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 10:59 --- Fixed for 4.3.4 and 4.0. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug debug/7055] [alpha osf4] G++ 3.1 Produced bad debugging entries if compiled with -gcoff, also segv.

2009-01-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 11:00 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Fixed for 4.3.4 and 4.0. ... and 4.4., of course. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7055

[Bug testsuite/38791] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/block-3.c (test for excess errors)

2009-01-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-11 11:13 --- Before closing this pr as fixed, I have a question: usually tests having -fdump-* in dg-options are doing some search of patterns in the dumped file, e.g. in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr35729.c /* { dg-options "-Os -fdump

[Bug c++/34749] Incorrect warning when applying dllimport to friend function

2009-01-11 Thread angry-kasyan at narod dot ru
--- Comment #8 from angry-kasyan at narod dot ru 2009-01-11 12:08 --- class __declspec(dllimport) QBitArray { //... friend __declspec(dllimport) QDataStream &operator<<(QDataStream &, const QBitArray &); friend __declspec(dllimport) QDataStream &operator>>(QDataStream &, QBitArra

[Bug other/38801] New: libgcc exception handling routines need documentation

2009-01-11 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
>From gcc/doc/libgcc.texi: << @node Exception handling routines @section Language-independent routines for exception handling document me! >> May be there's another place where these are documented? If so we should add a pointer in the manual. -- Summary: libgcc exception handling

[Bug fortran/38802] New: Seg fault for RESULT with allocatable components

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
Posted on the list by Marco Restelli http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/ $ gfortran test.f90 -o test $ ./test Segmentation fault $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.0 20090110 (experimental) [trunk revision 143243] System: Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r6 x86_64 AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technolo

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-11 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #25 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-11 12:30 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > __mc_moves_MOD_change_bond_length () at > /scratch/vondele/clean/cp2k/src/../src/mc_moves.F:1434 > 1434 atom_b(:)=0 > I had a

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-11 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #26 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-11 12:58 --- (In reply to comment #25) > I'll see if I > can narrow down the problem to the single subroutine (change_bond_length) > which > I suspect is the issue. [all of this with trunk 143207] yes, just looking at change_bond_

[Bug fortran/38802] Seg fault for RESULT with allocatable components

2009-01-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-11 13:26 --- Confirmed on i686-apple-darwin9 with -m64 or -m32 with optimization -O1 and above: Thread 0 Crashed: 0 a.out 0x1dec __mod_a_MOD_a_fun + 30 1 a.out 0

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-11 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #27 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 13:42 --- Subject: Re: [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary) On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:58 AM, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote: >> I'll see if I >> can narrow down the problem to the single subroutine (change_bond_length)

[Bug fortran/38765] [4.3 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 13:42 --- Subject: Bug 38765 Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 11 13:42:32 2009 New Revision: 143271 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143271 Log: 2009-01-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/38763 Backpo

[Bug fortran/38763] [4.3 Regression] TRANSFER ICE due to missing EXPR_NULL case

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 13:42 --- Subject: Bug 38763 Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 11 13:42:32 2009 New Revision: 143271 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143271 Log: 2009-01-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/38763 Backpo

[Bug libgcj/38803] New: [4.4 regression] Configure with "--enable-java-awt=x" requires Escher

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--disable-stage1-checking --enable-checking=release --without-system-libunwind --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20090111 (experimental) [trunk revision 143259] (GCC) # gmake ...(many hours) gmake[8]: Leaving

[Bug tree-optimization/38748] [4.4 Regression] Missed FRE because of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 14:29 --- This hits tramp3d a lot, we end up with D.919534 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.919509.D.78313.D.78008).D.78313.D.78008.domain_m[0].D.77181.D.47055.D.46936.domain_m; vs. D.919509.D.78313.D.78008... the following fixes it:

[Bug target/34571] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in alpha_expand_mov at -O3

2009-01-11 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 14:33 --- Subject: Bug 34571 Author: uros Date: Sun Jan 11 14:33:28 2009 New Revision: 143272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143272 Log: Backport from mainline: 2008-12-22 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/34571] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in alpha_expand_mov at -O3

2009-01-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #20 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 14:35 --- Fixed. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/36025] "cpu_set_t" not declared in "OS_Interface" compilation problem on alpha

2009-01-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 14:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please have a look at this: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00033.html But from the msg followup: Actually, the s-osinte-linux-alpha.ads and s-osinte-linux-hppa.ads files will be

[Bug tree-optimization/38748] [4.4 Regression] Missed FRE because of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 14:41 --- I can even see things like SR.20836 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(this->domain_m.D.115040.D.114739.domain_m[1].D.111565.D.45708.D.45522).D.45708.D.45522).D.45708.D.45522.domain_m[0]; in final cleanup :/ -

[Bug bootstrap/38804] New: gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
debug --disable-stage1-checking --enable-checking=release --without-system-libunwind --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20090111 (experimental) [trunk revision 143259] (GCC) #ggrep -B10 cross i386-pc-solaris2.11/

[Bug bootstrap/38743] gcc 4.4.0 20090106 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libgcc checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 15:02 --- In libjava too, see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38743

[Bug other/38805] New: sed Unterminated `s' command

2009-01-11 Thread thomas dot jourdan at gmail dot com
While configuring in the ./gcc directory, I have the following messages : Links are now set up to build a cross-compiler from i386-build_pc-solaris2.11 to i686-nptl-linux-gnu. updating cache ./config.cache configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating as sed: file ./confstatGfaGVq/s

[Bug other/38805] sed Unterminated `s' command

2009-01-11 Thread thomas dot jourdan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from thomas dot jourdan at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 15:19 --- Mistake in bug description : host = i386-pc-solaris2.11 build = i386-pc-solaris2.11 target = i686-nptl-linux-gnu This is a cross build -- thomas dot jourdan at gmail dot com changed: What|R

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 15:37 --- sigh ... and: trunk/libjava/classpath/configure Doing this to find them all: # { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }; } # Added - OpenSolaris - not cross compiling }; } cross_compiling=no -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 16:11 --- Changed that hack to: # { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }; } # Added - OpenSolaris - not cross compiling }; } fi fi fi cross_compiling=no echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5 echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6 - We do

[Bug libfortran/38772] r143102 breaks xplor-nih

2009-01-11 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 16:43 --- Reviewing code carefully, I found the following. I can not confirm this is the problem, but removing this portion of code does not cause a regression in our current testsuite. This snippit was left over from bef

[Bug bootstrap/38804] gcc 4.4.0 20090111 - The configure for $BUILD/amd64/libjava checks if 64 bit code can exec on 32 bit platform

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 16:51 --- There are a dozen occurances of this line in file: trunk/libjava/configure ac_link='$CC -o conftest$ac_exeext $CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5' I changed them to this and the hack let the build cont

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] New: [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Due to wrong TBAA pruning of points-to sets we miscompile the following once we inline foo into main. union U { float f; int i; }; /* GCC says the access through the union does alias the bare variable. */ int foo(union U *u, int *i) { *i = 1; u->f = 0.0; return *i; } extern void abort (vo

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 16:56 --- I have a patch, for alias-improvements branch sofar. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 17:11 --- Mine. We have to XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c again though. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 17:19 --- Hm, it looks like we might exclude that now. From invoke.texi: " Similarly, access by taking the address, casting the resulting pointer and dereferencing the result has undefined behavior, even if the cast uses a u

[Bug middle-end/38616] [4.3 Regression] Wrong code when -O3 or -O2 -fstack-protector used

2009-01-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 17:29 --- Subject: Bug 38616 Author: doko Date: Sun Jan 11 17:29:23 2009 New Revision: 143276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143276 Log: gcc/ 2009-01-11 Matthias Klose PR middle-end/38616, ba

[Bug middle-end/38616] [4.3 Regression] Wrong code when -O3 or -O2 -fstack-protector used

2009-01-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 17:38 --- Subject: Bug 38616 Author: doko Date: Sun Jan 11 17:38:22 2009 New Revision: 143277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143277 Log: 2009-01-11 Matthias Klose PR middle-end/38616 *

[Bug libgcj/30570] Word "DEBUG" used as a variable in VMAccessController.java breaks build

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 19:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Another "DEBUG" just showed up in "gcc version 4.3.0 20070716": > ... ping: gcc 4.4.0 20090111 trunk revision 143259 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30570

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 20:03 --- I think this is not a bug, I don't remember we ever said this is ok. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806

[Bug tree-optimization/38806] [4.4 Regression] Access through union does not conflict properly

2009-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 20:05 --- Ok, good. I'll make sure to fixup unclear comments in GCC code. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/30570] Word "DEBUG" used as a variable in VMAccessController.java breaks build

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-11 20:11 --- Another "DEBUG" just showed up in "gcc version 4.3.0 20090111": gcc_trunk/libjava/java/security/VMAccessController.h # gmake ... (hours later) libtool: compile: /usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -

[Bug c/38807] New: ice: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_phi()

2009-01-11 Thread regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
Seen using r143243 on Ubuntu Hardy on x86. reg...@john-home:~/volatile/tmp121$ current-gcc -O2 small.c small.c: In function ‘foo’: small.c:16: internal compiler error: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_phi() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at gimple.h:1729 Please submit a full b

[Bug c/38807] [4.4 regression] ice: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_phi()

2009-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 20:21 --- Mine, remove_visited_stmt_chain was added by me. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/38797] [c++0x] Missing warning about type qualifiers on late function return types

2009-01-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 20:31 --- IMO it would be inappropriate to give this warning for a late-specified return type. The warning is only there to catch old code which expects "const int foo()" to declare a const function returning int, rather than a

[Bug c++/36254] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning with IF_STMT

2009-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 21:15 --- Subject: Bug 36254 Author: jakub Date: Sun Jan 11 21:14:51 2009 New Revision: 143281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143281 Log: PR c++/36254 * cp-gimplify.c (genericize_if_stmt

[Bug c++/36254] [4.2/4.3 Regression] wrong "control reaches end of non-void function" warning with IF_STMT

2009-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 21:32 --- Fixed on the trunk. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail

[Bug middle-end/38808] New: another warning from system headers.

2009-01-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
$ g++ -m32 -Wall -O2 -g0 -std=c++0x bug.ii -c -o /dev/null ../../../buildenv/linux/gcc-4.3/32/STLport-5.2.1/include/stlport/stl/_algo.c: In member function ‘void sms::TbRunner::uClockChanged()’: ../../../buildenv/linux/gcc-4.3/32/STLport-5.2.1/include/stlport/stl/_algo.c:962: warning: array subscr

[Bug middle-end/38808] another warning from system headers.

2009-01-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-11 22:49 --- Created an attachment (id=17073) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17073&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38808

[Bug libfortran/38772] r143102 breaks xplor-nih

2009-01-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-01-11 23:00 --- The patch in comment 9 doesn't solve the issue with xplor-nih. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38772

[Bug c++/38625] Segmentation fault when dereferencing valid pointer, probably REGRESSION

2009-01-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 23:32 --- This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00886.html triggers this crash. It failed at -O1. With gcc 4.4, it failed at -O2. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/38625] Segmentation fault when dereferencing valid pointer, probably REGRESSION

2009-01-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 23:33 --- There are warnings like ../include/vigra/accessor.hxx: In function âvoid vigra::read_bands(vigra::Decoder*, ImageIterator, Accessor, SrcValueType) [with ImageIterator = vigra::CachedFileImageIterator >, Accessor = v

[Bug c++/38625] Segmentation fault when dereferencing valid pointer, probably REGRESSION

2009-01-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-11 23:46 --- Adding "--param inline-unit-growth=60" fixed gcc 4.4 revision 143274 at -O2. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/38717] gcc 4.4.0 20090102 - jc1: out of memory allocating ... (with 1 G of RAM)

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 00:09 --- With 1400M (and 512M swap) it dies here: gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libjava' if /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile /usr/share/src/gcc_build/gcc/gcj -B/usr/share

[Bug c++/34749] Incorrect warning when applying dllimport to friend function

2009-01-11 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #9 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-01-12 02:07 --- (In reply to comment #8) > still unfixed? Please provide a compilable self-contained testcase. Danny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34749

[Bug testsuite/38809] New: gcc.dg/pr38616.c doesn't work on Linux/ia64

2009-01-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[...@gnu-12 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 -fstack-protector ../../src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr38616.c ../../src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr38616.c:1: warning: -fstack-protector not supported for this target [...@gnu-12 prev-gcc]$ -- Summary: gcc.dg/pr38616.c doesn't work on Linux/

[Bug testsuite/38809] gcc.dg/pr38616.c doesn't work on Linux/ia64

2009-01-11 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 03:48 --- Subject: Bug 38809 Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 12 03:47:48 2009 New Revision: 143287 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143287 Log: 2009-01-11 H.J. Lu PR testsuite/38809 * gcc.dg/pr

[Bug c/35608] gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c fails -O2 -Os

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 04:24 --- On i386-pc-solaris2.11 (OpenSolaris 2008.11) compiling gcc 4.4.0 20090104 I did NOT get this failure: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00488.html Now when I compile: gcc version 4.4.0 20090111

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - "make -i check" - over 60 FAILs in "C" compiler

2009-01-11 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
emented > the needed PCH functions yet. Now we have those few and a hundred more in gcc version 4.4.0 20090111 (experimental) [trunk revision 143259]. Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38730

[Bug fortran/38802] Seg fault for RESULT with allocatable components

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:21 --- This does the job: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 143242) +++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy) @

[Bug fortran/38763] [4.3 Regression] TRANSFER ICE due to missing EXPR_NULL case

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:22 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the reort. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38765] [4.3 Regression] ICE in check_host_association

2009-01-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:23 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the reort. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/38606] AIX: build failed in stage 2

2009-01-11 Thread tammer at tammer dot net
--- Comment #11 from tammer at tammer dot net 2009-01-12 07:12 --- Hello, any news ? Bye Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38606

[Bug bootstrap/38607] AIX error messages about TOC during build

2009-01-11 Thread tammer at tammer dot net
--- Comment #12 from tammer at tammer dot net 2009-01-12 07:13 --- Hello, any news ?? Bye Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607

[Bug ada/36025] "cpu_set_t" not declared in "OS_Interface" compilation problem on alpha

2009-01-11 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Comment #5 from oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2009-01-12 07:58 --- (In reply to comment #4) Oh well. If your change will fix it, I'm happy... Thx for the information! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36025