--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 23:53 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 23:53 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 23:59 ---
t21 is invalid because you create a standard_layout_base from each element and
then copy the resulting temporary into the array. With the fix I just checked
in you can remove the initializer_list constructor and write
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 00:19 ---
Works just fine e.g. on ppc (big-endian as well; had to add a couple of extra
int arguments before the short ones to make them passed on the stack).
Can you reproduce it on any primary/secondary big-endian target (mip
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-12-03 00:49 ---
600b9bbf6c9016b24a7c8f1cc1f4385d859f2b46 is first bad commit
commit 600b9bbf6c9016b24a7c8f1cc1f4385d859f2b46
Author: jakub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Aug 11 21:22:43 2005 +
* dwarf2out.c (add_location_or_con
The following (contrived) example was compiled with -O3 -fwhole-program.
void func1() { }
void func2(void(*fn)(void)) { fn(); }
void func3() { func2(&func1); }
int main()
{
return 0;
}
running objdump on the output results in
:
0: 4e 80 00 20 blr
0004 :
4: 9
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 01:41 ---
*** Bug 38378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 01:41 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 01:41 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35728 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
The following (contrived) example was compiled with -O3 -fwhole-program.
void func1() { }
void func2(void(*fn)(void)) { fn(); }
void func3() { func2(&func1); }
int main()
{
return 0;
}
running objdump on the output results in
:
0: 4e 80 00 20 blr
0004 :
4: 9
--- Comment #2 from patrick at motec dot com dot au 2008-12-03 02:03
---
It seems my searching skills need improving.
Sorry for the duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38378
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 02:05 ---
*** Bug 38379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38378
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 02:05 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38378 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 04:06
---
Eric,
Here is the problem I am seeing:
gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
-Wc++-compat -Wmissing-forma
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 05:52 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Did you get the expected result also?
>
I couldn't tell - I did not have the 32 bit library installed. I'll try to fix
that.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
Hello to gcc forums,
Please kindly help in solving this bug under compiling my project with gcc.
"could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status"
Please help me... thank u
--
Phaniram vvs
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 37980
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38083
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38125
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 37928
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 37852
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38073
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38038
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 37883
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38039
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 3 07:33:52 2008
New Revision: 142384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142384
Log:
2008-12-02 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Sjod
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
