--- Comment #1 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 07:07 ---
It seems to be related to fix committed for http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36991
--
raj dot khem at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
SLP vectorization of reductions is not implemented.
The following example demonstrate the opporunity for such vectorization:
cut here ==
struct mystr
{
int f1;
int f2;
};
struct mystr a[16];
struct mystr b[16];
int res1, res2;
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
int sum1;
int sum2;
f
--- Comment #7 from victork at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 08:11 ---
Regarding missing SLP vectorization of reductions I have opened new bug report
- PR37027.
Regarding not vectorized call to __builtin_cexpi() we already have a bug report
PR6 about missing support of generic vecto
--- Comment #6 from victork at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 08:16 ---
> Hm, following testcase doesn't vectorize due to vect cost model
> (-O2 -msse3 -ftree-vectorize -ffast-math) on i686 target:
The problem is that we count some costs twice - as being vectorized by SLP and
non-SLP. I
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 08:52 ---
Works for me if you schedule another copyprop and dce before the vectorizer.
t2.i:19: note: transform reduction: created def-use cycle:vect_var_.52_80 = PHI
...
t2.i:14: note: vectorized 1 loops in function.
but i
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 08:54 ---
Patch is pre-approved.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37024
--- Comment #2 from victork at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 11:07 ---
> Works for me if you schedule another copyprop and dce before the vectorizer.
Yes, on powerpc it gets vectorized by non-SLP even without additional copyprop
and dce, but in this case non-SLP vectorization require p
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 09:04 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 09:06 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 11:42 ---
Subject: Bug 37026
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 5 11:40:48 2008
New Revision: 138699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138699
Log:
2008-08-05 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 11:43 ---
Subject: Bug 37026
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:33 2008
New Revision: 138700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138700
Log:
2008-08-05 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 11:58 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Dear Ozonline.com.au Email Account User,
We wrote you on 5th of August 2008 advising that you change the password on
your account in order to prevent any unauthorised account access following the
network instruction we previously communicated, all Mailhub systems will
undergo regularly sched
When I attempt to compile the snapshot of 20080801 on an AlphaStation 255 I get
the following errors:
gcc -c -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
-Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -DHAVE_
On HP-UX we clashed with the problem that application falls in coredump if
exception is thrown by the function that returns float (or double) and this
function is placed in shared library.
What is interesting - the same function that returns int (or long, etc) works
correctly.
The example below ill
--- Comment #1 from v dot grikyan at sam-solutions dot net 2008-08-05
14:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=16024)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16024&action=view)
Example that illustrates the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37029
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 14:19
---
With -msse4, we got
bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -msse4 -S
/export/gnu/src/gcc-work/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr36992-1.c
bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -msse4 -S
/export/gnu/src/gcc-work/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 15:24 ---
I can no longer reproduce this bug on either the 4.3 branch or mainline-- for
both C and C++. If there is no update on this in the next week, I will close
the bug.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 15:43 ---
Subject: Bug 37010
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Aug 5 15:41:59 2008
New Revision: 138730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138730
Log:
gcc/
2008-08-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-en
--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 15:43
---
It is a middle-end bug. expand_call fails to handle increased stack
alignment when passing a parameter on stack. A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00320.html
--
hjl dot tools at
--- Comment #6 from doko at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 15:45 ---
Subject: Bug 31890
Author: doko
Date: Tue Aug 5 15:44:20 2008
New Revision: 138731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138731
Log:
2008-08-05 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libgcj/
Hi,
I have the following code and I wonder why C++ complains.
namespace S {
class L;
class S;
}
using namespace S;
class C {
void m(::S::L *l) {};
};
$ g++ main.5.cpp
main.5.cpp:12: error: 'struct S::S::L' has not been declared
Shouldn't it be clear that I wan't to access class L in
nam
--- Comment #1 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-08-05 15:56 ---
Stephen Rothwell reported that he also saw it on powerpc.
I verified the bug on powerpc with the following gcc versions:
- 4.2.4
- 4.3, latest svn
- 4.4, latest svn
4.1.2 is fine.
--
bunk at stusta dot de changed:
--- Comment #2 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-08-05 15:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=16025)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16025&action=view)
hw.i.gz
$ powerpc64-linux-gcc --version
powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.4.0 20080805 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 20
--- Comment #8 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-05 16:59 ---
> Ralf Wildenhues 2008-08-05 wrote:
> Rob, please let's not play ping pong with the severity of this bug.
?
OK, I'll leave it with you.
> GCC configury mostly assumes that available commands respect POSIX
The default P
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 17:11 ---
Reducing for PPC-linux-gnu.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 17:34
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00324.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Current mainline fails to compile h264ref from SPEC CPU2006 with some sets of
options. It's somewhat intermittent but complaints from valgrind appear to be
consistent. Here's the failure for -O3 -ftree-loop-linear using cc1 from
within a script; using the same command directly didn't result in th
--- Comment #20 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 17:41 ---
Subject: Bug 36992
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Aug 5 17:40:16 2008
New Revision: 138734
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138734
Log:
gcc/
2008-08-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/36
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 17:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=16026)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16026&action=view)
minimized testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37031
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 17:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16027)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16027&action=view)
output of valgrind and GCC for minimized testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37031
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 17:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=16028)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16028&action=view)
script to compile testcase under valgrind
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37031
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 18:03 ---
Reduced testcase:
void ath9k_hw_9280_spur_mitigate( int bin, int cur_vit_mask) {
int i;
signed char mask_m[123];
signed char mask_p[123];
signed char mask_amt;
for (i = 0; i < 123;i++)
{
int __x1 = ({
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 18:07 ---
This worked for at least 3.4.0 as this tree was able to be expanded :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 18:23 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 37024
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Aug 5 18:23:07 2008
New Revision: 138735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138735
Log:
2008-08-05 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
Multi-line comments in an included file trigger "invalid character in name"
compiler error.
!file1.F95
program file1
include 'file2.F95'
stop
end program
!file2.F95
/* blah */
--
Summary: Multi-line comments in an included file trigger invalid
character
--- Comment #7 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 19:06
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi again. I have essentially only one substantive comment: can you double
> check
> the implementation is correct vs 20.7.12.2.1/37 ?
I believe the use of std::ref was to make the D pa
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 19:22 ---
Cf. multiple topic PR 35707.
The problem is that
include 'file2.F95'
is not processed through CPP. I'm not sure whether it should and when it should
(file extension .F/F90/F95/F03/F08/FPP/FOR/fpp, always, or never)
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-05 19:26
---
Excellent. Thanks a lot again, Jonathan.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from godom at twinbee dot com 2008-08-05 21:07 ---
I guess that would only work with GCC but if we can get OpenMP working, that
might be good enough. Thank you ^_^.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37032
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 21:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Cf. multiple topic PR 35707.
>
> The problem is that
> include 'file2.F95'
> is not processed through CPP. I'm not sure whether it should and when it
> should
> (file extension .F/F90/F95
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 21:24 ---
A regression showed that the problem shown by valgrind was introduced by this
patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=135672
r135672 | spop | 2008-05-20 19:11:56 + (Tue, 20 May 2008)
--
janis a
--- Comment #4 from godom at twinbee dot com 2008-08-05 21:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Cf. multiple topic PR 35707.
> >
> > The problem is that
> > include 'file2.F95'
> > is not processed through CPP. I'm not sure whether it should and when it
> >
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #4
> Does the Fortran standard mention preprocessing at all?
No. Section 1.1 (the very 1st section) states
1.1 Scope
ISO/IEC 1539 is a multipart International Standard; the parts are publi
--- Comment #6 from godom at twinbee dot com 2008-08-05 22:04 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
ok. Thank you very much for your help ^_^.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37032
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 22:23 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 5 22:22:00 2008
New Revision: 138740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138740
Log:
PR c++/37016
* tree-ssa.c (useless_type_conversi
Revision 138733 has:
if (flag_dwarf2_cfi_asm && dwarf2out_do_frame ())
cpp_define (pfile, "__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_ASM");
It doesn't work with PCH:
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/valid-1b.c:3:
warning: ./valid-1b.h.gch: not used because `__GCC_HAVE_DWARF2_CFI_A
--- Comment #45 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 23:14
---
Can you try those 2 patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00231.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00320.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37012
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 23:38 ---
Simon, is this fixed? If so, you should close it as FIXED.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36999
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 23:50 ---
Old, no version, no activity, Eclipse bug closed as WONTFIX, so we do the same.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 01:55 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 6 01:54:31 2008
New Revision: 138755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138755
Log:
PR c++/37016
* tree-ssa.c (useless_type_conversi
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 02:26 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 6 02:25:20 2008
New Revision: 138756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138756
Log:
PR c++/37016
* decl.c (build_ptrmemfunc_type): D
...
mkdir -p ada/bldtools/einfo
(cd ada/bldtools/sinfo && gnatmake -q xsinfo && ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h )
rm -f ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.ads ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.adb
ada/bldtools/einfo/xeinfo.adb
cp -p ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.ads ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.adb
../../gcc/gcc/ada/xeinfo.adb ada/bldto
--- Comment #46 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-08-06
03:02 ---
I haven't done a complete bootstrap but rebuilding the compiler and the
libstdc++v3 directory
with these patches doesn't eliminate the eh-alloca-1.exe execution failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 03:06 ---
Which exception support are you using (dwarf2 or sjlj)?
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 03:14 ---
Fixed in two different ways.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:12 ---
> Does the Fortran standard mention preprocessing at all?
Yes, part 3 of the Fortran standard is about preprocessing ("Conditional
Compilation", "CoCo"), however, to my knowledge hardly anyone uses it and no
compiler
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:24 ---
> For an initial, incomplete patch see:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-07/msg00248.html
Slighly updated version. Set tradtional to 0 in fortran/cpp.c to enable new
features, which will fail if the following (wo
--- Comment #25 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:25
---
Subject: Bug 35659
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Wed Aug 6 06:23:47 2008
New Revision: 138759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138759
Log:
PR target/35659
* haifa-sched.c (sched_
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=16029)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16029&action=view)
libcpp patch (w/o setting traditional = 0 )
Said patch, see comment 7 for TODO items.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #2 from xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com 2008-08-06 06:30
---
Created an attachment (id=16030)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16030&action=view)
Testcase.
Hi, I got the similar failure on linux/x86 platform.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] minbuild]$
/home/xguo2/int
--- Comment #26 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:36
---
Subject: Bug 35659
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Wed Aug 6 06:34:18 2008
New Revision: 138762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138762
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2008-08-06 Max
> mkdir -p ada/bldtools/einfo
> (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo && gnatmake -q xsinfo && ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h )
> rm -f ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.ads ada/bldtools/einfo/einfo.adb
> ada/bldtools/einfo/xeinfo.adb
> cp -p ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.ads ../../gcc/gcc/ada/einfo.adb
> ../../gcc/gcc/ada/xeinfo.adb a
--- Comment #3 from xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com 2008-08-06 06:38
---
Created an attachment (id=16031)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16031&action=view)
A smaller case.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stackalign]$ /home/xguo2/app/stack-internal/bin/g++ -m32 -Os
-fasynchrono
--- Comment #27 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 06:38
---
Should be fixed on both trunk and 4_3-branch.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from charlet at adacore dot com 2008-08-06 06:39 ---
Subject: Re: New: /bin/sh: line 1: 26087 Aborted (core
dumped) ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h
> mkdir -p ada/bldtools/einfo
> (cd ada/bldtools/sinfo && gnatmake -q xsinfo && ./xsinfo ../../sinfo.h )
> rm -f ada/bldto
--- Comment #25 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 06:57 ---
ping...
Can this be fixed before 4.3.2? thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
68 matches
Mail list logo
