--- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-08-04
13:24 ---
I can't provide an .o until tonight but the last eh-alloca-1.s and the previous
eh-alloca-1.ii should be okay for a test case. I'll see if I can prune that
into
a smaller testcase later tonight.
--
ht
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 13:36 ---
Because somehow we get into
/* If we can determine the final value of the control iv exactly, we can
transform the condition to != comparison. In particular, this will be
the case if DELTA is constant.
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 13:41 ---
Of course it didn't work. The following seems to
Index: gcc/cp/class.c
===
--- gcc/cp/class.c (revision 138611)
+++ gcc/cp/class.c (working
--- Comment #6 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 13:44 ---
> Andrew John Hughes 2008-06-20 14:34:
> What is this bug waiting on?
> Tom Tromey 2007-05-24 17:18:
> I think gjdoc only recently got support for generics and annotations.
> So an older gjdoc is expected to fail. I haven
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2008-08-04 13:50 ---
Changed severity back up to normal (from minor) since this bug has sat open for
a year with no reply, and there is something to fix.
--
rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 13:53 ---
Subject: Bug 37009
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Aug 4 13:51:36 2008
New Revision: 138621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138621
Log:
gcc/
2008-08-04 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-end
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 14:00 ---
Causes
FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem8.C (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/ptrmem8.C (test for errors, line 19)
Jason - can you help here? Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #11 from Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2008-08-04 14:11 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Did you mean we needed 2 "additional 'and $-16, sp" insns to align the
> stack? I don't think so.
Definitely not.
Solution 1: Just ignore it. __m128 parameter shouldn't be passed with
-mpr
--- Comment #29 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 14:57 ---
Subject: Bug 37012
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Aug 4 14:56:12 2008
New Revision: 138631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138631
Log:
2008-08-04 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/37012
--- Comment #1 from simonb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 36999
Author: simonb
Date: Mon Aug 4 15:09:56 2008
New Revision: 138633
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138633
Log:
PR c++/36999
* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_t
Szia
Szeretnék figyelmedbe ajánlani egy INGYENES SEX OLDALT!!!
IME A CIME: http://freesex.rapidsms.eu
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo