On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:37:05AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Michael Meissner wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:50:58AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 July 2008 09:24, Sajish V wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the reply, Denys.
> > > > My question was, wh
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 08:31 ---
Subject: Bug 34389
Author: manu
Date: Wed Jul 30 08:30:32 2008
New Revision: 138296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138296
Log:
2008-07-30 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 3
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 08:36 ---
This should be mostly fixed except the following testcase in C++:
short mask1(short x)
{
short y = 0x7fff;
return x & y; /* { dg-bogus "conversion" "conversion" { xfail *-*-* } 8 } */
}
This works in C, so it se
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keyw
Hello i have code working in gcc 2.96 and porting it to gcc 4.1.1 gives me a
complete different result; please suggest what should i change in my code to
make to portable for gcc 4.1.1 specific
//code that was working in gcc 2.96
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
typedef struct c
{
--- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 09:15 ---
Fix depends, add keyword, add alias "Wundefined".
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 09:23 ---
This patch limits recursion in tree-vrp.
Index: tree-vrp.c
===
--- tree-vrp.c (revision 136670)
+++ tree-vrp.c (working copy)
@@ -4049,6 +4049,8 @@
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 09:26 ---
I think -Wundefined should warn for any potential undefined and unspecified
behaviour. I know they are not the same according to the standard but for a
practical point of view they both result in a behaviour that is no
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 10:20 ---
And
struct A
{
A ();
void *operator new (__SIZE_TYPE__, int = 0);
template void operator delete (void *, T);
};
template <> void A::operator delete (void *, int);
A *p = new A;
ICEs in coerce_delete_type, typ
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 10:22 ---
Any progress with this? Stage 1 will end soon...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36365
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail||4.4.0
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-07-30 10:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: MIPS: gcc-4.3.1 still fails to compile
glibc w/ PR/35802 applied
Please don't report bugs against 4.3.1 plus a random patch; test the
current version of gcc-4_3-branch instead. This should hav
--- Comment #6 from michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot gov 2008-07-30
10:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > The bug does not occur on snapshots released after 05/02/08
>
> Michael, just to make sure, the reported ICE is gone for good?
> (If yes, we can close this PR ...)
I have n
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 11:57 ---
Patch has been posted 3 months ago.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 12:05 ---
> I have not seen this bug in any version of gfortran other than the snapshot
> of 05/02/08. I am willing to close this PR, along with 36139 and 36140.
Closing this PR (and the others) as WORKSFORME.
Thanks for the
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 12:07 ---
Closing as WORKSFORME - the reporter can not reproduce the problem (see
PR36157, comment #6).
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 12:07 ---
Closing as WORKSFORME - the reporter can not reproduce the problem (see
PR36157, comment #6).
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Running the testcase from PR33927 on spu-gcc 4.4.0 2008062 generates the
following code which contains a redundant creation of stack frame:
test1:
fa $3,$3,$4
stqd$sp,-48($sp)
ai $sp,$sp,-48
lnop
ai $sp,$sp,48
bi $lr
.
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 12:39 ---
I think there are many bugs that are only reported when a template is
instantiated, and this is just one of them.
If you add
B b;
to the testcase, it will be rejected. IMHO this isn't a bug.
--
jakub at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 12:40 ---
I agree there is no need to fix this on the older branches.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #20 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:00
---
Note that changes to gnattools/ are to be described in gnattools/ChangeLog.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
--- Comment #14 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:09 ---
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:07:50 2008
New Revision: 138308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138308
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/
--- Comment #21 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:10 ---
Yes, I already moved the relevant entry to gnattools/ChangeLog.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:12 ---
reopened just because it is not a dup of PR5911...
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:12 ---
... and closed because it was fixed by the introduction of libaad
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #15 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:19 ---
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:18:31 2008
New Revision: 138309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138309
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
ICE when compiling legal(at least compiles with 4.1.2) code
I will attach the preprocessed compilation unit.
--
Summary: ICE when compiling legal(at least compiles with 4.1.2)
code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #1 from r0bertz at gentoo dot org 2008-07-30 13:49 ---
configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_alpha20080718/work/gcc-4.4-20080718/configure
--prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.4.0-alpha20080718
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/mipsel-unknown
--- Comment #2 from r0bertz at gentoo dot org 2008-07-30 13:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=15977)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15977&action=view)
preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36973
--- Comment #3 from r0bertz at gentoo dot org 2008-07-30 13:53 ---
mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 -march=loongson2f -mabi=32 -pipe -W -Wall
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -D_REENTRANT
-DPATH_SANE_CONFIG_DIR=/etc/sane.d -DPATH_SANE_DATA_DIR=/usr/share
-DPATH_SANE_L
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:53 ---
Fixed, thanks.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from r0bertz at gentoo dot org 2008-07-30 13:55 ---
the exact error message is:
hp3900.c: In function 'fitcalibrate_get':
hp3900.c:61: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
sorry for sending so many times.
this is my first time to file gcc bugs.
i will send all nee
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 14:46 ---
well...
(gdb) call debug_tree (t)
def_stmt
version 447 in-free-list>
we release the SSA_NAME with remove_phi_node (&psi, true); before then
examining its uses ...
We forget to do so for the other stmts we r
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30774
--- Comment #5 from froydnj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 15:32 ---
Subject: Bug 35866
Author: froydnj
Date: Wed Jul 30 15:30:59 2008
New Revision: 138316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138316
Log:
PR target/35866
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (SL
--- Comment #10 from dvilleneuve at kronos dot com 2008-07-30 15:39 ---
An updated patch for gcc 4.3 is available in the following message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00653.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Gcc 4.4 revision 138310 failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64:
./../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__addvsi3':
../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:104: internal compiler error: in
call_from_call_insn, at final.c:1760
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropria
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 15:45 ---
Subject: Bug 36967
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 30 15:43:42 2008
New Revision: 138318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138318
Log:
2008-07-30 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 16:04 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 16:05 ---
Fixed by the tuples merge.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 16:24 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcc]$ cat foo.i
extern void abort (void);
typedef int SItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
typedef unsigned int USItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
SItype
__addvsi3 (SItype a, SItype b)
{
const
c/cc1 -fpreprocessed
foo.i -quiet -dumpbase foo.i -auxbase foo -O -version -o foo.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.0 20080730 (experimental) [trunk revision 138310]
(ia64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42), GMP
version 4.2.2, MPFR version 2.3.1.
GGC heuri
--- Comment #22 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-07-30 16:32 ---
Sorry about the misplaced ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
Hi all,
gcc-4.2.2 seems to generating wrong/misaligned code for movapd.
I have used the same test case mentione here (for almost the similar bug)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6012
The relavent information about the version and the files are as follows:
The version of gcc:
gcc -
--- Comment #3 from espindola at google dot com 2008-07-30 16:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=15978)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15978&action=view)
proposed fix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36974
--- Comment #11 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 17:44 ---
Please ping that patch on the gcc-patches list.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 18:06 ---
For an initial, incomplete patch see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-07/msg00248.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28662
--- Comment #5 from schwab at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 36929
Author: schwab
Date: Wed Jul 30 18:22:50 2008
New Revision: 138333
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138333
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/36929
* dse.c (replace_inc_dec): Use emit_i
--- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-07-30 18:24 ---
Fixed in 4.3 branch and trunk.
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from schwab at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 36929
Author: schwab
Date: Wed Jul 30 18:23:14 2008
New Revision: 138334
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138334
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/36929
* dse.c (replace_inc_dec): Use emit_i
--- Comment #7 from gcc-gnu-org at the-tilghman dot com 2008-07-30 18:38
---
Fixed by adding noclobber to the assembly of the code in question.
--
gcc-gnu-org at the-tilghman dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
overload-address.cc: In function void g():
overload-address.cc:6: error: address of overloaded function with no contextual
type information
while compiling this:
void f(int);
void f(double);
void g()
{
(&f)(1.0); // well-formed, see 13.3.1.1p3 over.match.call
}
--
Summary: o
Some newly added stack alignment tests failed on Linux/ia32:
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/unwind-2.C -O1 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/unwind-2.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/unwind-2.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution
test
FAIL: g++.dg/torture/sta
In expand_stack_alignment, we decide we need to relign stack to support
big outgoing stack boundary. Reload will make frame pointer available
for stack alignment by eliminating it to stack pointer. After reload,
we realize that we don't need to relign stack after all, for example,
callee doesn't
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 21:27 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg02351.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 21:27
---
Created an attachment (id=15979)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15979&action=view)
unique_ptr and rvalue-reference updates from WP
I'm going to be offline until next week so here's what I hav
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-30 21:49
---
Many thanks Jonathan! By the time you will be back online, my comments will be
ready and in any case will be able to commit the changes! Thanks again, Paolo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 21:53
---
Do you still see it after revision 38335? If you really want, you
can check MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT, but not PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36450
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 21:58
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg02378.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:24
---
Subject: Bug 36974
Author: espindola
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:23:33 2008
New Revision: 138347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138347
Log:
2008-07-30 Rafael Avila de Espindola <[EMAIL PROTECTED
The following C testcase was reduced from a C++ benchmark:
unsigned short status;
void foo (const _Bool flag)
{
if (status == 2 || status == 7)
{
while (status != 2 && (status != 7 || !flag))
{
}
}
}
After the merge of the tuples branch into mai
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:39
---
Recategorizing.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Compo
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:53 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:56
---
Subject: Bug 36554
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:54:56 2008
New Revision: 138348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138348
Log:
PR ada/36554
* dwarf2out.c (is_subrange_
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:59 ---
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (lhs)
(_Bool) flag_7(D)
In tree_may_unswitch_on, we have:
126 cond = fold_build2 (gimple_cond_code (stmt), boolean_type_node,
127 gimple_cond_lhs (stmt), gi
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 23:59
---
Sort of.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|e
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-31 01:04
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Running the program below compiled with "-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2"
> gets a "segmentation fault" because the variable "tmp"
> is not properly aligned on a 16-byte boundary (required f
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 01:05
---
Subject: Re: attribute((aligned)) doesn't work for variables on the stack for
greater than required alignement
> This should work with gcc 4.4 revision 138335.
Only on x86 and not on any other target ...
-- Pin
--- Comment #2 from kumba at gentoo dot org 2008-07-31 01:21 ---
My apologies! I searched in several areas (google, gcc ML, gcc-bugs, etc..),
and nothing turned up at first, so I thought I'd log a bug. Bit behind and
playing catch up on a number of things.
I'll test the linked patch a
--- Comment #20 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-31 02:01 ---
With all the supplied test cases and data, why is it so hard to move the bug
out of the UNCONFIRMED state. It should be fairly easy to confirm that it is a
problem by running the attached test.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-31 03:42 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-31 04:05 ---
With revision 138354, we got
bash-3.2$ cat /tmp/x.c
#include
extern void bar (char *);
char *
e1 (float x, char *p)
{
volatile __m128 dummy = _mm_set_ps1(x);
char foo [0];
bar (foo);
return p;
}
bash-3.2$
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 05:08 ---
Subject: Bug 11309
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 31 05:07:10 2008
New Revision: 138355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138355
Log:
PR c++/11309
* tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Spl
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 05:10 ---
I agree with Jakub. Closing as INVALID.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 05:11 ---
Fixed for 4.4.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-31 05:16 ---
Fixed by revision 138335.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 05:21 ---
No, this is not fixed fully. It is only fixed for x86.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
This doesn't work: g++-4.3.1
These work: g++-3.4.6 g++-4.1.2 g++-4.2.4
$ g++-4.3.1 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.1-r1/work/gcc-4.3.1/configure --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.3.1
--includedir=/usr/
At revision 138355 the compiler configured with RTL checking fails to bootstrap
on i586-suse-linux with:
/home/eric/build/gcc/native32/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/eric/build/gcc/native32/./gcc/
-B/home/eric/install/gcc/i586-suse-linux/bin/
-B/home/eric/install/gcc/i586-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem
/home/eric/i
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 06:57
---
Created an attachment (id=15980)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15980&action=view)
Preprocessed file to be compiled with -msse -g -mtune=i586.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
85 matches
Mail list logo
