[Bug target/35807] Compiler makes use of [std Y+1, rX] instruction without initializing r28,r29

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35807

[Bug target/35807] Compiler makes use of [std Y+1, rX] instruction without initializing r28,r29

--- Comment #3 from ruud at betaresearch dot nl 2008-04-02 22:57 --- (In reply to comment #2) > From Andy H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [avr-gcc-list] Incorrect code by gcc? > > Not a bug OK, I changed the status to INVALID. Ruud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35807

[Bug middle-end/35808] New: In function 'inflateBack': ../../gcc/zlib/infback.c:612: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DLT_OBJDIR=".libs/" -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_GETPAGESIZE=1 -DHAVE_MMAP=

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/35808] In function 'inflateBack': ../../gcc/zlib/infback.c:612: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

/gcc-4.4.0 --with-local-prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --build=hppa-linux --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20080402 (experimental) [trunk

[Bug middle-end/35808] In function 'inflateBack': ../../gcc/zlib/infback.c:612: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-02 23:41 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35800 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35800 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-02 23:41 --- *** Bug 35808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ada/35284] Branch to 0x0 from Ada run-time

--- Comment #31 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 00:10 --- (In reply to comment #30) > Did you look at what happens in Initialize_TCB to the variable Success ? After waiting and waiting at the hospital today, I had plenty of time to think. My guess was that the saved copy o

[Bug bootstrap/35804] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

--- Comment #4 from oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-03 00:12 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Sounds like you should be using --build-sysroot= and not set > LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET > and CPPFLAGS_FOR_TARGET . > I pulled the compiler command that failed, and ran it with -v.

[Bug ada/35284] Branch to 0x0 from Ada run-time

--- Comment #32 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 00:14 --- Created an attachment (id=15417) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15417&action=view) Correct structure bindings pthread_condattr_t was missing a field. sched_param had an incorrect type. -- ht

[Bug target/35801] [4.4 Regression]: At revision 133817, bootstrap fails at libstdc++-v3/src/strstream.cc on powerpc-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 00:33 --- Subject: Bug 35801 Author: dje Date: Thu Apr 3 00:33:05 2008 New Revision: 133855 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133855 Log: 2008-04-03 Dominique d'Humieres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR targ

[Bug target/35801] [4.4 Regression]: At revision 133817, bootstrap fails at libstdc++-v3/src/strstream.cc on powerpc-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #5 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 00:34 --- Patch in comment #3 applied. Fixed. -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/32353] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Miscompilation with RESULT_DECL

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32353

[Bug tree-optimization/28029] [4.1 Regression] wrong optimization with -ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 01:08 --- I ran into this even without the vectorizer :). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28029

[Bug bootstrap/35804] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

--- Comment #5 from oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-03 01:40 --- Is this something special in the compiler specs for libc? I created this test file conftest.c #include int testing_lib() { printf("hello world!\n"); return 0; } And ran a scaled down

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

--- Comment #16 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:09 --- Subject: Bug 35800 Author: hp Date: Thu Apr 3 02:08:13 2008 New Revision: 133856 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133856 Log: PR middle-end/35800 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr35800.c:

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

--- Comment #17 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:10 --- Subject: Bug 35800 Author: hp Date: Thu Apr 3 02:09:20 2008 New Revision: 133857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133857 Log: PR middle-end/35800 * expr.h (try_casesi): Adjust prot

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

--- Comment #18 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:18 --- I presume we can close this one as (comment #13 and comment #13) has been committed. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/35800] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 133835 failed to compile binutils

--- Comment #19 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:20 --- s/13 and 13/13 and 14/ in comment #18 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35800

[Bug tree-optimization/35809] New: default case label for casesi should be spliced off from last element

The fix for PR middle-end/35800 was to find a "new" default label as one is required by the casesi pattern, but value-range-propagation had determined that a switch statement can't fall through or reach the default label, so "it was NULL". The fix was to arbitrarily use the first label of the case

[Bug c++/35799] GCC uses inheritance information it doesn't yet know

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:51 --- It is a delayed instantiation issue, we are instantiating Fnord::Fnord at the wrong spot, *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16635 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug c++/16635] g++ instantiates templates at the wrong place

--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 02:51 --- *** Bug 35799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/35804] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails

--- Comment #6 from oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-04-03 03:24 --- (In reply to comment #5) Ok, so this is a sysroot bug in binutils that they marked as invalid http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4966 I guess I would argue that it's not invalid anymore since

[Bug ada/35284] Branch to 0x0 from Ada run-time

--- Comment #33 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-04-03 03:46 --- Great news! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35284

[Bug ada/35284] Branch to 0x0 from Ada run-time

--- Comment #34 from laurent at guerby dot net 2008-04-03 03:47 --- May be other platform aligned the record 8 byte hence hiding the issue, and x86 only 4 bytes hence showing it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35284

[Bug target/35795] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133787 breaks ia64

--- Comment #6 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2008-04-03 05:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 133787 breaks ia64 hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > *** ia64_output_mi_thunk (FILE *file, tree t > final_end_function (); > + free_after_compilation (cfun); The

[Bug rtl-optimization/35281] [4.3 Regression] multiply with 0 generated for 64*32->64

--- Comment #16 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-04-03 05:37 --- Subject: Bug 35281 Author: bonzini Date: Thu Apr 3 05:36:26 2008 New Revision: 133859 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133859 Log: 2008-04-03 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-optim

[Bug target/35795] [4.4 Regression] Revision 133787 breaks ia64

--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-04-03 06:12 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Revision 133787 breaks ia64 > The patch is OK. > > But won't all targets that have similar code need the same fix? If I cd > to the config dir, and try "grep final_end_function */*" it looks

[Bug rtl-optimization/35785] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr11832.c doesn't work for Linux/ia64

--- Comment #1 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2008-04-03 06:26 --- Subject: Re: New: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr11832.c doesn't work for Linux/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > (set (pc)^M > (reg:DI 2 loc79)) 329 {indirect_jump} (nil))^M This is a problem with the

[Bug rtl-optimization/35785] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr11832.c doesn't work for Linux/ia64

--- Comment #2 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 06:27 --- Created an attachment (id=15418) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15418&action=view) ia64.h patch to define REGNO_OK_FOR_INDIRECT_JUMP_P Obvious definition of the REGNO_OK_FOR_INDIRECT_JUMP_P macro

[Bug rtl-optimization/35785] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr11832.c doesn't work for Linux/ia64

--- Comment #3 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-03 06:29 --- Created an attachment (id=15419) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15419&action=view) rtl-factoring.c patch to allocate second reg for IA-64 This allocates a second register if REGNO_OK_FOR_INDIRECT

<    1   2