--- Comment #148 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-02-18 08:10 ---
(In reply to comment #147)
> (In reply to comment #146)
> > (In reply to comment #145)
> > > current gfortran trunk seems to fail on CVS sources of CP2K with:
> > PR34946
>
> Joost - can this be closed again?
Done, b
I tried compiling my open source application with GCC. My application uses
OpenMP to make use of available CPU cores and run faster. I got an internal
compiler error from GCC, even though the same code compiles and runs fine
(using both cores) under Intel's ICC. It also compiles and runs fine with
--- Comment #9 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2008-02-18
08:32 ---
> What will happen now? Will anyone send an interpretation request, which will
> bring it up on the table again?
No, as it isn't *impossible* to implement it (with a hidden argument), an
interp won't stan
ith-gmp=/home/ralf/local
--with-mpfr=/home/ralf/local
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20080218 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-o' 'a' '-v' '-mtune=generic'
/home/ralf/gcc-test/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.0/cc1
-quiet
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 09:41 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35185 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 09:41 ---
*** Bug 35247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-18 09:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=15183)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15183&action=view)
Patch to implement missed optimization.
2008-02-18 Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/33555
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 10:07 ---
libgcc_s goes into slibdir which is set as
AC_ARG_WITH(slibdir,
[ --with-slibdir=DIR shared libraries in DIR [[LIBDIR]]],
slibdir="$with_slibdir",
if test "${enable_version_specific_runtime_libs+set}" = set; t
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from lakshmivaraganm at hcl dot in 2008-02-18 12:08 ---
This "Crash on exit" problem is there if we call exit(0) or call return 0.
If _exit(0) is used, there is no crash.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35179
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 15:23 ---
The testcase compiles with -fno-gcse. However, the result from the gcse1
pass using the 4.2 branch is similar to that with 4.3.
In the greg dump with 4.3, we have:
(insn 957 956 958 132
../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/
I seem to have found a problem where gcc-4.1.2 and gcc-4.2.3 miscompile Emacs'
src/intervals.c when using optimisation on solaris 8.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.3
I discove
--- Comment #2 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-18 18:06
---
> > I appreciate that Emacs is not the smallest of test cases and I apologise in
> > advance for this crime. Anything I can do to help determine the cause?
>
> Are you familiar with src/intervals.c? If so, y
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 17:51
---
> I have reproduced this with gcc-4.1.2 and gcc-4.2.3. I cannot reproduce it
> using Sun Studio CC-5.7. I also could not reproduce it on RHEL-5 with its
> gcc-4.1.2, nor could a couple of other people who tried
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 18:21
---
> Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with
> src/intervals.c and I doubt if it is easy to split it up...
Is it possible to guess in what function things go awry?
> But, to answer your
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-18 23:44 ---
Subject: Bug 34921
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 18 23:43:23 2008
New Revision: 132396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132396
Log:
gcc/
2008-02-18 Joey Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-end
--- Comment #7 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-02-19 00:58 ---
How can GCC conclude that a call is going to be infrequent? Doesn't that
amount to predicting the future? Also, if an object is constructed, then it
will
be destroyed. So there is almost a 100% chance of calling the des
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 01:21 ---
Subject: Bug 35189
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Feb 19 01:21:03 2008
New Revision: 132403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132403
Log:
gcc/
2008-02-18 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/351
--- Comment #9 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 01:30 ---
Fixed
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 01:29 ---
Subject: Bug 35071
Author: pbrook
Date: Tue Feb 19 01:29:09 2008
New Revision: 132404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132404
Log:
2008-02-19 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-19 02:45
---
Confirmed. 4.2.2 produces unnecessary pushes and pops. 4.3.0 causes worse code
than 4.2.x and adds unnecessary moves. Adding const or pure function attributes
do not seem to help in 4.3.0.
--
eric dot wedd
--- Comment #29 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-19 02:47
---
Rask's patch (gcc-4.3-bug-11180-experimental.patch) causes worse code for the
test case in bug #32871, than without the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11180
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-19 02:29 ---
Won't fix 4.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00715.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 02:20 ---
Paul,
notice that you fixed this *after* GCC 4.3 branched, so if your intention was
to fix it also for GCC 4.3, you would need to commit the fix to the branch (and
get a RM to approve it).
--
manu at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #4 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 03:23 ---
Subject: Bug 12618
Author: bje
Date: Tue Feb 19 03:23:15 2008
New Revision: 132405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132405
Log:
PR other/12618
* testsuite/Makefile.in (mostlyclean):
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 04:12 ---
Fixed in trunk.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 04:28 ---
It appears this regressions was introduced in revision 130297.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #11 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 04:33 ---
Subject: Bug 35071
Author: pbrook
Date: Tue Feb 19 04:32:15 2008
New Revision: 132408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132408
Log:
2008-02-19 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 04:37
---
Can this issue now be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35088
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-02-19 05:32 ---
Here is the email thread that started it all:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-02/msg00197.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35250
When gmp and mpfr are in the build tree of gcc, they will be automatically
configured and build. However, some of the options passed to configure are
incorrect according to the GMP manual:
[Begin quote] "Note that the `--target' option is not appropriate for
GMP. It's for use when building compil
--- Comment #15 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-02-19 06:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 23:19
> ---
> It looks like simply del
--- Comment #10 from xinliangli at gmail dot com 2008-02-19 06:00 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> in the following code gcc choses the registers in such a way that it causes
> itself an extra copy for every loop iteration and has to jump past the copy to
> start the loop... it's probably
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 06:42 ---
> gcc version 4.2.0 20060713 (experimental)
That is an old version of 4.2.0, can you try a new version of gcc 4.2.x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35251
during compile, received the following output
bug.f: In function 'master.0.mnthweek':
bug.f:82: error: invalid operand to binary operator
__result_master.0.mnthweekD.911
bug.f:82: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
--- Comment #5 from corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 06:34
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can this issue now be closed?
IMO, yes. But I prefer to leave closing this PR to an m68k-specialist.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35088
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 07:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33555
Author: uros
Date: Tue Feb 19 07:23:30 2008
New Revision: 132414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132414
Log:
PR target/33555
* config/i386/i386.md (*x86_movsicc
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-02-19 07:41 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 07:53 ---
fixed in mainline
--
chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
43 matches
Mail list logo
