--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #19 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #27 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #15 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #51 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #15 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:54 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:02 ---
Reopen temporarily ...
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:05 ---
... to mark as a duplicate of PR 29479. They are almost the same testcase.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29479 ***
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:05 ---
*** Bug 27289 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29479
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:08 ---
*** Bug 29479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27289
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:10 ---
Confirmed with GNU C (GCC) version 4.3.0 20080122 (experimental)
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #15 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:42 ---
Subject: Bug 33781
Author: sayle
Date: Fri Feb 1 17:41:48 2008
New Revision: 132047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132047
Log:
PR bootstrap/33781
* configure.ac (--enable-fix
--- Comment #41 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2008-02-01 17:46 ---
TER will not replace any load into an expression if there is more than one use
of the load. Your sample shows multiple uses of each load. If it did this
substitution, it could be introducing worse code, it doesn't know.
If you build a cross-host compiler (such as building a
mips64-linux-gnu native compiler from x86_64-linux-gnu),
--with-gmp and --with-mpfr rightly apply to the host.
However, even the generator files include and
, so the build machine needs gmp.h and mpfr.h
to be installed too. There's no real ne
With revision 131998 on Linux/ia32, I got
Executing on host:
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/simd3.C
-nostdinc++
-I/export/build/
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:55 ---
Somehow after SRA we end up creating a PHI node with an empty definition:
# BLOCK 5 freq:2931, starting at line 7057
# PRED: 276 [98.0%] (true,exec) 3 [98.0%] (true,exec)
# inf$sideD.88720_393 = PHI
This no
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:49
---
Testing a patch.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assigne
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:00 ---
Not a duplicate of PR 5035, sice that one is fixed and this isn't.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-02-01
18:08 ---
Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C fails
> Dave, is this test still failing on hppa? On the branch and trunk?
It is not failing on either 4.2 or trunk. Checked hppa-unknown-linux-gnu,
hppa2.0w-hp-
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:13
---
Thus fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WA
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:16 ---
I tried to debug this but it just keep spilling gibberish, which makes it hard
to debug under emacs. Is there a commandline option to stop C++ front-end
hyper-verbose output?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:10 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35049 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:10 ---
*** Bug 35052 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-01 18:48 ---
Revision 131984 seems the cause:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-01/msg00747.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> The PHI is correct, you get one arg per incoming edge.
What I meant by correct is that there is some reasonable way to end up with
this PHI containing an empty definition when there is n
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-01 18:40 ---
The test works on Linux/Intel64 with -m32:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] g++]$
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../
/net/gnu-13
--- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-02-01
18:23 ---
Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C fails
> Thus fixed.
The test needs adjustment.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27707
--- Comment #2 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-02-01 18:24 ---
I tried a more recent GCC checkout of the trunk and I no longer have this
issue, even with the old gettext. If this reoccurs I'll try updating gettext.
Thanks, and please feel free to close this issue report. Or should I
--- Comment #24 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2008-02-01
18:53 ---
please mention 35045 in the testcase and changelog entry (not 34054).
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35045
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 18:59 ---
Subject: Bug 34993
Author: rth
Date: Fri Feb 1 18:58:21 2008
New Revision: 132049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132049
Log:
PR c/34993
* tree.c (build_type_attribute_qual_varian
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 34773
Author: hp
Date: Fri Feb 1 21:28:06 2008
New Revision: 132052
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132052
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/34773
* gcc.target/cris/torture/pr3
--- Comment #16 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2008-02-01
21:01 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> There is a lot of unexpected failures, so I will retest with BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2
> and without the patch in the next ~24..36 hours.
BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 bootstrap/regtest difference:
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 21:29 ---
Subject: Bug 34773
Author: hp
Date: Fri Feb 1 21:28:46 2008
New Revision: 132053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132053
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/34773
* reg-notes.def (EQUAL): Ment
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.3 |4.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33410
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 21:30 ---
Fixed.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #42 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 22:33
---
So for summary.
With TER disabled, I get 6.2s, so we are still worse than 3.4 that is 5.6s.
With call-cost inline parameter increased and TER disabled, I get 5.3s.
With forwprop fix, ter disabled and inline pa
--- Comment #43 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-02-01 22:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] performance loss (not inlining as
much??)
> TER will not replace any load into an expression if there is more than one use
> of the load. Your sample shows multiple uses of each lo
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 22:54
---
I've tried the following "trivial" patch (which should handle both common
blocks and equivalences):
Index: trans-common.c
===
--- trans-common.c
--- Comment #44 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 22:55
---
(In reply to comment #42)
> I don't see how to track the TER and inlining limits issue with current
> organization of compiler. It is probably GCC-4.4 thing if we get lucky.
I rather not have TER changed, because
--- Comment #6 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 23:39 ---
Configuring --without-x is a possible workaround. I haven't tried it. I also
haven't tried to reproduce the problem.
The problem comes from the AC_PATH_XTRA call in libjava/configure.ac. This is
a documented autoc
--- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 01:42 ---
Subject: Bug 25445
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Feb 2 01:42:03 2008
New Revision: 132060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132060
Log:
Backport:
2007-08-02 Nathan Froyd <[EMAIL PROTE
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 02:02 ---
Subject: Bug 25445
Author: ghazi
Date: Sat Feb 2 02:01:46 2008
New Revision: 132061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132061
Log:
Backport:
2007-08-02 Nathan Froyd <[EMAIL PROTE
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 02:05
---
Reply to comment #21. I am aware of the 65535 limit. At least this minor
patch gets rid of a segfault, and handling the large array constructors by
building the array at run time is obviously not fixed yet.
-
--- Comment #8 from singhai at gmail dot com 2008-02-02 03:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=15075)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15075&action=view)
Another variant of the bug
Another internal compiler error with a similar symptoms.
f.c:11: internal compiler error:
--- Comment #9 from singhai at gmail dot com 2008-02-02 03:27 ---
(From update of attachment 15075)
class Header {};
template
class NGram {
public:
Header GetHeader() const;
} __attribute__((__packed__));
template
Header NGram::GetHeader() const {
return 0;
}
--
http://gcc
--- Comment #10 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-02-02 04:07 ---
Sharad, what compiler version did you use for the new testcases?
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.1.3 4.2.4 4.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.3
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 05:19 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Subject: Re: "make check" fails to compile library testcases
> >> I'll take a look.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> Sure, I'm just a little busy.
It's been a year... :-)
I still see this problem, rec
-- cut here --
#include
int main()
{
float dest = 0.0;
__m128 xmm0 = {0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0};
_mm_store_ps(&dest, xmm0);
return 0;
}
-- cut here --
[~]> gcc -msse2 -o test test.c
[~]> ./test
zsh: segmentation fault ./test
It doesn't crash when compiled with icc. Also testc
101 - 190 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
