--- Comment #12 from cgf at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-31 19:27 ---
14:27
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34631
--- Comment #17 from peter at pogma dot com 2007-12-31 19:28 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> This was also a problem on solaris:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4850
I mean
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4886
--
peter at pogma dot com changed:
--- Comment #18 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2007-12-31
19:39 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Because it is not currently possible to build an autoconf based project on aix
> with gcc without doing --disable-largefile, we would like to see this fixed.
More accurately, it
--- Comment #22 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-12-31 19:43 ---
The patch in comment #11 fixes the failure of
gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_malloc_size_var.c on i686-apple-darwin9 32 bit mode, but
I have still the failures reported in comment #6 of PR34534 in 64 bit mode.
--
http://
--- Comment #13 from cgf at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-31 19:58 ---
email seems to be working
--
cgf at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #9 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-31
20:26 ---
Applying that patch also works for gcc-4.2-20071226.
So, it seems that patch was simply never applied to 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34625
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-31 20:29 ---
This seems fixed now, again ignore this bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi GCC Fortran developers!
I was playing with some CaSe changing routines and I ran into a crash when I
tried to use a FORALL statement instead of a DO loop.
The routine that is failing (from my perspective) is SUBROUTINE TO_UPPER(STR).
--
MODULE CASECONV
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE TO_UPPER(STR)
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 01:22 ---
This works on the trunk for 4.3.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34633
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 01:25 ---
That is because it is the same as PR 31217.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31217 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 01:25 ---
*** Bug 34633 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 02:09
---
This appears to have been fixed by the following change on the trunk:
2007-09-04 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* invoke.texi (-finline-small-functions): Document.
* ipa-inline.c (cgraph_defaul
I have this piece of code:
__asm__(
"someasm" :
:
"i" (&&a),
"i" (&&b));
a:
printf("Hello World!\n");
b:
_PREVENTCOMPILERERROR();
static inline void _PREVENTCOMPILERERROR() {
/*nothing*/;
}
However it generates wrong assembler code:
13 matches
Mail list logo
