[Bug fortran/34438] gfortran not compliant w.r.t default initialization of derived type component and implicit SAVE attribute

2007-12-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 00:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14761) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14761&action=view) A prototype patch This is as far as I got at the airport - it fixes the problem but has not yet been fully regtes

[Bug fortran/34387] FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f90

2007-12-14 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-15 00:46 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f90 > gfortran -fdump-tree-original gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f90 Dump attached for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 target. > ./a.out # to make sure crashes also

[Bug bootstrap/34474] New: find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
/bin/sh ../../gcc/../move-if-change tmp-macro_list macro_list echo timestamp > s-macro_list rm -rf include; mkdir include chmod a+rx include if [ -d ../prev-gcc ]; then \ cd ../prev-gcc && \ make real-install-headers-tar DESTDIR=`pwd`/../gcc/ \ libsubdir=. ; \

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 03:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14763) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14763&action=view) fixinc.in.patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #2 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 03:31 --- Created an attachment (id=14764) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14764&action=view) fixinc.in.patch -- mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz changed: What

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 03:49 --- does changing -o to -or work? I would rather not do two finds. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474

[Bug target/34475] New: TLS and PIE don't mix on x86-64

2007-12-14 Thread drepper at redhat dot com
Compiling this little program as a PIE leads to problems on x86-64: $ cat w.c __thread int a; int main(void) { return a; } Using gcc -o w -g -O2 -pie -fpie w.c one sees /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccU3JvLp.o: relocation R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against `a' can not be used when making a shared object; reco

<    1   2